Alternative Policies for Collaborative Publishing in Natural Resource Journals

References

• Aad, G., T. Abajyan, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, S. Abdul Khalek, A. A. Abdelalim, O. Abdinov, et al. 2012. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Physics Letters B 716 (1):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta, M., and L. Alberto. 2007. Cómo definir autoría y orden de autoría en artículos científicos usando criterios cuantitativos. [Defining authoring and order of authorship in scientific papers using quantitative criteria.] Universitas Scientiarum 12 (1):67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Adamczyk, P. D., and M. B. Twidale. 2007. Supporting multidisciplinary collaboration: Requirements from novel HCI education. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1073–76. San Jose, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., R. de Loë, and R. Plummer. 2012. Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters 5 (4):245–55. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barter, C., and E. Renold. 1999. The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update 25 (9):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, P. K., and R. A. Gross. 2011. Honorary and ghost authorship. British Medical Journal 343:d6223. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belone, L., J. E. Lucero, B. Duran, G. Tafoya, E. A. Baker, D. Chan, C. Chang, E. Greene-Moton, M. A. Kelley, and N. Wallerstein. 2014. Community-based participatory research conceptual model community partner consultation and face validity. Qualitative Health Research 26:117–35. doi:10.1177/1049732314557084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, X., B. Esfandiari, and L. McHenry. 2012. Challenging medical ghostwriting in US courts. PLoS Medicine 9 (1):e1001163. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie, B. H., and L. V. Lawson. 2014. Community-based participatory research: Lessons from the field. In Nursing research using participatory action research: Qualitative designs and methods in nursing, ed. M. de Chesnay, 137–50. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caine, K. J., M. J. Salomons, and D. Simmons. 2007. Partnerships for social change in the Canadian north: revisiting the insider? Outsider dialectic. Development and Change 38 (3):447–71. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castleden, H., V. S. Morgan, and A. Neimanis. 2010. Researchers’ perspectives on collective/community co-authorship in community-based participatory indigenous research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5 (4):23–32. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávez, V., B. Israel, A. J. Allen, M. F. DeCarlo, R. Lichtenstein, A. Schulz, I. S. Bayer, and R. McGranaghan. 2004. A bridge between communities: Video-making using principles of community-based participatory research. Health Promotion Practice 5 (4):395–403.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 2009. Signs of epistemic disruption: Transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal. First Monday 14 (4):13–61.
   Google Scholar
• Costas, R., and M. Bordons. 2011. Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics 88 (1):145–61. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0368-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Science Editors. 2012. CSE's white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/entire_whitepaper.pdf (accessed March 15, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. 2001. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 (7):558–69. doi:10.1002/asi.1097.abs
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alonzo, K. T. 2010. Getting started in CBPR: Lessons in building community partnerships for new researchers. Nursing Inquiry 17 (4):282–88. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00510.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dance, A. 2012. Authorship: Who’s on first? Nature 489 (7417):591–93. doi:10.1038/nj7417-591a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff, F., C. D. DeAngelis, J. M. Drazen, J. Hoey, L. Højgaard, R. Horton, S. Kotzin, M. G. Nicholls, M. Nylenna, A. J. P. M. Overbeke, H. C. Sox, M. B. Van Der Weyden, M. S. Wilkes. 2001. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 127 (10):1178–80. doi:10.1001/archotol.127.10.1178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeAngelis, C. D., and P. B. Fontanarosa. 2008. Impugning the integrity of medical science: The adverse effects of industry influence. Journal of the American Medical Association 299 (15):1833–35. doi:10.1001/jama.299.15.1833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCaro, D. A. 2009. The promise and challenge of applying community psychologi’s praxis of empowerment to the burgeoning field of community-based conservation. In Community psychology: New developments, ed. N. Lange and M. Wagner, 143–60. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2008. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 49 (3):182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K. 2011. Planned obsolescence: Publishing, technology, and the future of the academy. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., W. Vanderbilt, and L. Berrang-Ford. 2012. Authorship in IPCC AR5 and its implications for content: Climate change and Indigenous populations in WGII. Climatic Change 113 (2):201–13. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0350-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparyan, A. Y., L. Ayvazyan, and G. D. Kitas. 2013. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatology International 33 (2):277–84. doi:10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geelhoed, R. J., J. C. Phillips, A. R. Fischer, E. Shpungin, and Y. Gong. 2007. Authorship decision making: An empirical investigation. Ethics & Behavior 17 (2):95–115. doi:10.1080/10508420701378057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, A. R., and H. Castleden. 2008. Community co-authorship in academic publishing: A commentary. Canadian Journal of Native Education 31 (1):208.
   Google Scholar
• Haeussler, C., and H. Sauermann. 2013. Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Research Policy 42 (3):688–703. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyer, A., C. Scott, and L. Lagendyk. 2012. Researcher-decision-maker partnerships in health services research: Practical challenges, guiding principles. BMC Health Services Research 12 (1):280. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley, V., E. Teijlingen, and P. Simkhada. 2013. Academic authorship: who, why and in what order? Health Renaissance 11 (2):99–101. doi:10.3126/hren.v11i2.8214
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). 1985. Guidelines on authorship. British Medical Journal 291:722.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). 2013. Defining the role of authors and contributors. In Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals [Internet], ed. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2–4. Vancouver, BC, Canada: International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. http://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/new_rec_aug2013.html (accessed October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kakuk, P. 2014. Beyond the IF boycott: Let’s think about counter‐incentives against illegitimate co‐authorship. EMBO Reports 15 (11):1104–5. doi:10.15252/embr.201439026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. 2012. Multiauthor papers: onward and upward. Science Watch 23:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, R., K. Baccar, and R. H. Lemelin. 2012. Moving from research ON, to research WITH and FOR Indigenous communities: A critical reflection on community‐based participatory research. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien 56 (2):195–210. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. J., C. R. Sugimoto, G. Zhang, and B. Cronin. 2013. Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, A. C., L. E. Commanda, W. L. Freeman, N. Gibson, M. L. McCabe, C. M. Robbins, and P. L. Twohig. 1999. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. BMJ: British Medical Journal 319 (7212):774–78. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, A. C., and P. A. Nutting. 2006. Moving the frontiers forward: incorporating community-based participatory research into practice-based research networks. The Annals of Family Medicine 4 (1): 4–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušić, A., L. Bošnjak, and A. Jerončić. 2011. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. Plos One 6 (9):e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynes, M. J., J. L. Pierce, and B. Laslett. 2012. Telling stories: The use of personal narratives in the social sciences and history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKeough, A., S. Bird, E. Tourigny, A. Romaine, S. Graham, J. Ottmann, and J. Jeary. 2008. Storytelling as a foundation to literacy development for Aboriginal children: Culturally and developmentally appropriate practices. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 49 (2):148–54. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. 2007. Ethical issues in the involvement of young service users in research. Ethics and Social Welfare 1 (2):176–93. doi:10.1080/17496530701450364
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., and N. Wallerstein. 2003. Introduction to community based participatory research. In Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes, ed. M. Minkler and N. Wallerstein, 3–26. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Parlee, B. 2012. Finding voice in a changing ecological and political landscape—Traditional knowledge and resource management in settled and unsettled claim areas of the northwest territories, Canada. Aboriginal Policy Studies 2 (1). doi:10.5663/aps.v2i1.17704
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, D., V. Yank, and L. Emanuel. 1997. When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association 278 (7):579–85. doi:10.1001/jama.278.7.579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauder, D. 1993. Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=iatul (accessed March 15, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, A. J., E. A. Parker, B. A. Israel, A. B. Becker, B. J. Maciak, and R. Hollis. 1998. Conducting a participatory community-based survey for a community health intervention on Detroit’s east side. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 4 (2):10–24. doi:10.1097/00124784-199803000-00004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smylie, J., M. Olding, and C. Ziegler. 2014. Sharing what we know about living a good life: Indigenous approaches to knowledge translation. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada 35 (1):16–23. doi:10.5596/c14-009
   Google Scholar
• Spier, R. 2002. The history of the peer-review process. Trends in Biotechnology 20 (8):357–58. doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01985-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• St. Denis, V. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Aspects of the concept relevant for practice. In Critical strategies for social research, ed. W. K. Carroll, 292–302. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, J. M., W. A. Rogers, M. Israel, and A. J. Braunack-Mayer. 2010. Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Social Science & Medicine 70 (9):1458–65. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo, M. Y., A. Acosta, and G. P. Correa. 2012. Authorship of scientific articles within an ethical-legal framework: Quantitative model. Universitas Scientiarum 17 (3):315–29. doi:10.11144/javeriana.sc17-3.aosa
   Google Scholar
• Venter, J. C., M. D. Adams, E. W. Myers, P. W. Li, R. J. Mural, G. G. Sutton, H. O. Smith, et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291 (5507):1304–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, M., A. Ammerman, E. Eng, G. Gartlehner, K. N. Lohr, D. Griffith, S. Rhodes, et al. 2004. Community‐based participatory research: Assessing the evidence: Summary. http://193.170.242.194/imperia/md/content/department/evidenzbasierte_medizin/abstracts_publikationen_gerald/community-based_participatory_research._assessing_the_evidence.pdf (accessed November 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, W. B., A. E. Wallace, and B. C. S. Kimberly. 2004. Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals. Social Science & Medicine 59 (9):1949–54. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wislar, J. S., A. Flanagin, P. B. Fontanarosa, and C. D. DeAngelis. 2011. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal 343:d6128. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. M. 1969. Information, communication, knowledge. Nature 224:318–24. doi:10.1038/224318a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar