Changes in Wisconsin’s Large Private Forests, 1999–2015: Land Ownership, Conservation, and Recreational Access

References

• American Forest and Paper Association. 2015. State industry economic impact: Wisconsin. http://www.afandpa.org/docs/default-source/2015-fact-sheets/wisconsin.pdf (accessed August 15, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bell, K. 2007. Houses in the woods: Lessons from the Plum Creek concept plan. Maine Policy Review 16 (2):44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., J. O. Fletcher, and K. C. Nelson. 2004. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2):271–86. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C., and L. A. Wayburn. 2001. America’s private forests: Status and stewardship. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, J. C., E. C. Kelly, J. Abrams, C. Bailey, and J. Dyer. 2010. Disintegration of the U.S. industrial forest estate: Dynamics, trajectories, and questions. Small-Scale Forestry 9 (1):53–66. doi:10.1007/s11842-009-9101-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, B. J., P. F. Catanzaro, J. L. Greene, J. H. Hewes, M. A. Kilgore, D. B. Kittredge, Z. Ma, and M. L. Tyrrell. 2012. Taxing family forest owners: Implications of federal and state policies in the United States. Journal of Forestry 110 (7):371–80. doi:10.5849/jof.11-097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., E. Pohnan, and M. W. Stone. 2014. Impact of globalization on forest users: Trends and opportunities. In The global forest sector: Changes, practices, and prospects, ed. E. Hansen, R. Panwar, and R. Vlosky, vol. 35, 15–40. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clutter, M., B. Mendell, D. Newman, D. Wear, and J. Greis. 2005. Strategic factors driving timberland ownership changes in the U.S. South. Preliminary Report to the Southern Group of State Foresters. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/econ/pubs/southernmarkets/strategic-factorsand-ownership-v1.pdf (accessed July 30, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cubbage, F., P. Mac Donagh, G. Balmelli, V. M. Olmos, A. Bussoni, R. Rubilar, R. De La Torre, R. Lord, J. Huang, and V. A. Hoeflich. 2014. Global timber investments and trends, 2005–2011. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 44 (suppl. 1):S7. doi:10.1186/1179-5395-44-s1-s7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigle, J. J., L. Utley, L. C. Chase, W. F. Kuentzel, and T. L. Brown. 2012. Does new large private landownership and their management priorities influence public access in the Northern Forest? Journal of Forestry 110 (2):89–96. doi:10.5849/jof.10-091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, D. F. 1993. An empirical study of posting private nonindustrial forests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21 (1):6–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellefson, P. V., and M. A. Kilgore. 2010. United States wood-based industry: A review of structure and organization. Staff Paper Series Number 206. St. Paul, MN: Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfax, S. K. 2005. Buying nature: The limits of land acquisition as a conservation strategy, 1780–2004. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernholz, K., J. L. Bowyer, and J. Howe. 2007. TIMOs & REITs: What, why & how they might impact sustainable forestry. Minneapolis, MN: Dovetail Partners, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Froese, R., M. Hyslop, C. Miller, B. Garmon, H. McDiarmid, Jr., A. Shaw, L. Leefers, M. Lorenzo, S. Brown, and M. Shy. 2007. Large-tract forestland ownership change: Land use, conservation, and prosperity in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. Ann Arbor, MI: National Wildlife Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Ginger, C., M. R. Emery, M. J. Baumflek, and D. E. Putnam. 2012. Access to natural resources on private property: Factors beyond right of entry. Society & Natural Resources 25 (7):700–15. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.633596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., J. H. Haggerty, and W. R. Travis. 2006. Ranchland ownership change in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, 1990–2001: Implications for conservation. Society & Natural Resources 19 (8):743–58. doi:10.1080/08941920600801181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnoe, A. 2014. The political economy of institutional landownership: Neorentier society and the financialization of land. Rural Sociology 79 (4):478–504. doi:10.1111/ruso.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnoe, A., and P. K. Gellert. 2011. Financialization, shareholder value, and the transformation of timberland ownership in the US. Critical Sociology 37 (3):265–84. doi:10.1177/0896920510378764
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, J. M., L. C. Irland, and A. A. Whitman. 2005. Changing timberland ownership in the Northern Forest and implications for biodiversity. Brunswick, ME: Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, C. 2007. TIMOs and REITs: Situation brief. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S., and S. A. Sader. 2006. Effects of forest ownership and change on forest harvest rates, types and trends in northern Maine. Forest Ecology and Management 228 (1):177–86. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, S., M. Grodzińska-Jurczak, and G. Brown. 2014. Conservation on private land: A review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (4):576–97. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.875463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgore, M. A., J. L. Greene, M. G. Jacobson, T. J. Straka, and S. E. Daniels. 2007. The influence of financial incentive programs in promoting sustainable forestry on the nation’s family forests. Journal of Forestry 105 (4):184–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, C. M., and A. R. Rissman. 2012. Unexpected co-benefits: Forest connectivity and property tax incentives. Landscape and Urban Planning 104 (3):418–25. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., B. J. Butler, P. F. Catanzaro, J. L. Greene, J. H. Hewes, M. A. Kilgore, D. B. Kittredge, and M. Tyrrell. 2014. The effectiveness of state preferential property tax programs in conserving forests: Comparisons, measurements, and challenges. Land Use Policy 36:492–99. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcouiller, D. W., and T. Mace. 1999. Forests and regional development: Economic impacts of woodland use for recreation and timber in Wisconsin, vol. 3694. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin–Extension, Cooperative Extension.
   Google Scholar
• Mendell, B. 2011. How do timberland investment managers (TIMOs) make money? Forisk Consulting. http://www.forisk.com/blog/2011/06/20/how-do-timberland-investment-managers-timos-make-money/ (accessed December 16, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Merenlender, A., L. Huntsinger, G. Guthey, and S. Fairfax. 2004. Land trusts and conservation easements: Who is conserving what for whom? Conservation Biology 18 (1):65–76. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Agricultural Statistics Service [NASS]. 2015. Wisconsin land sales. U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Wisconsin/Publications/Land_Sales/ (accessed August 15, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, C., and S. Bergman. 2004. The managed forest law property tax program. In Forestry facts, pp. 1–2. Madison, WI: Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin. http://forestandwildlifeecology.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/50.pdf (accessed July 30, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Owley, J., and A. R. Rissman. 2016. Trends in private land conservation: Increasing complexity, shifting conservation purposes and allowable private land uses. Land Use Policy 51:76–84. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plum Creek Timber Co. 2015. Recreational lease management. http://www.plumcreek.com/PlumCreek/media/Library/PDFs/Recreation/Plum-Creek-Northern-Hunting-Program.pdf (accessed March 12, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Rickenbach, M. G., and P. H. Gobster. 2003. Stakeholders’ perceptions of parcelization in Wisconsins Northwoods. Journal of Forestry 101 (6):18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissman, A., M. Bihari, C. Hamilton, C. Locke, D. Lowenstein, M. Motew, J. Price, and R. Smail. 2013. Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements. Environmental Management 52 (1):277–88. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0091-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. A., and B. J. Butler. 2012. A national assessment of public recreational access on family forestlands in the United States. Journal of Forestry 110 (6):318–27. doi:10.5849/jof.11-090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of Wisconsin. 2016. 2015 Wisconsin Act 358. http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2015/related/acts/358.pdf (accessed May 15, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, F. W. 1997. History of the Lake States Forests: Natural and human impacts. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. http://www.mtu.edu/forest/about/outreach/nasp/pdfs/Stearns_1997.pdf (accessed July 15, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Trust for Public Land. 2015. Conservation almanac. www.conservationalmanac.org (accessed November 14, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., B. J. Butler, and R. V. Nagubadi. 2012. Institutional timberland ownership in the US South: Magnitude, location, dynamics, and management. Journal of Forestry 110 (7):355–61. doi:10.5849/jof.11-090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, F. C., and F. W. Cubbage. 2003. Financial analysis of timber investments. In Forests in a market economy, ed. E. O. Sills and K. Abt, 77–95. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar