Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 30, 2017 - Issue 6
275
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
POLICY REVIEWS/ANALYSES

Changing Course: Comparing Emerging Watershed Institutions in River Restoration Contexts

, &
Pages 765-781 | Received 04 Aug 2015, Accepted 08 Jul 2016, Published online: 08 Nov 2016

References

  • Ananda, J., and W. Proctor. 2013. Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics 86:97–106. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.018
  • Barbour, M. T., W. F. Swietlik, S. K. Jackson, D. L. Courtemanch, S. P. Davies, and C. O. Yoder. 2000. Measuring the attainment of biological integrity in the USA: A critical element of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia 422 (423):453–64. doi:10.1023/A:1017095003609
  • Bidwell, R., and C. Ryan. 2006. Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 19 (9):827–43. doi:10.1080/08941920600835585
  • Casper, A. F., J. H. Thorp, S. P. Davies, and D. L. Courtemanch. 2006. Ecological responses of zoobenthos to dam removal on the Kennebec River, Maine, USA. Large Rivers 16 (4):541–55.
  • Crane, J. 2009. “Setting the river free”: The removal of the Edwards dam and the restoration of the Kennebec River. Water History 1 (2):131–48. doi:10.1007/s12685–009-0007–2
  • DeWalt, K., and B. DeWalt. 2011. Participant observation 2nd ed. Plymouth, UK: AltaMira Press.
  • Freitag, A. 2014. Naming, framing, and blaming: Exploring ways of knowing in the deceptively simple question “What is water quality?” Human Ecology 42 (2):325–37. doi:10.1007/s10745–014-9649–5
  • Fryirs, K., and G. J. Brierley. 2009. Naturalness and place in river rehabilitation. Ecology and Society 14 (1):20–20.
  • Fryirs, K., B. Chessman, and I. Rutherfurd. 2013. Progress, problems and prospects in Australian river repair. Marine and Freshwater Research 64 (7):642. doi:10.1071/MF12355
  • Gregory, C., G. Brierley, and R. Le Heron. 2011. Governance spaces for sustainable river management. Geography Compass 5 (4):182–99. doi:10.1111/j.1749–8198.2011.00411.x
  • Hall, C. J., A. Jordaan, and M. G. Frisk. 2010. The historic influence of dams on diadromous fish habitat with a focus on river herring and hydrologic longitudinal connectivity. Landscape Ecology 26 (1):95–107. doi:10.1007/s10980–010-9539–1
  • Hardy, S. D., and T. M. Koontz. 2009. Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. Policy Studies Journal 37 (3):393–414. doi:10.1111/j.1541–0072.2009.00320.x
  • Hardy, S. D., and T. M. Koontz. 2010. Collaborative watershed partnerships in urban and rural areas: Different pathways to success? Landscape and Urban Planning 95 (3):79–90. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.005
  • Imperial, M. 1999. Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: The institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management 24 (4):449–65. doi:10.1007/s002679900246
  • Imperial, M. 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration and Society 37 (3):281–320. doi:10.1177/0095399705276111
  • Jacobs, K., L. Lebel, J. Buizer, L. Addams, P. Matson, E. McCullough, P. Garden, G. Saliba, and T. Finan. 2010. Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (17)4591–96. doi:10.1073/pnas.0813125107
  • Johnson, E. S., K. P. Bell, and J. E. Leahy. 2014. Disamenity to amenity: The social implications of river restoration. PhD dissertation, University of Maine, Orono, ME.
  • Judd, R. W. 1990. The coming of the Clean Water Acts in Maine, 1941–1961. Environmental History Review 14 (3):50–73. doi:10.2307/3984726
  • Kerr, J. 2007. Watershed management: Lessons from common property theory. International Journal 1 (1):89–109. doi:10.18352/ijc.8
  • Koontz, T. M., D. Gupta, P. Mudliar, and P. Ranjan. 2015. Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: A synthesis framework. Environmental Science & Policy 53:139–51. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.003
  • Leach, W., N. Pelkey, and P. Sabatier. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (4):645–70. doi:10.1002/pam.10079
  • Leahy, J. E., and D. H. Anderson. 2010. “Cooperation gets it done:” Social capital in natural resources management along the Kaskaskia River. Society & Natural Resources 23 (3):15. doi:10.1080/08941920802378897
  • Lebel, L., J. M. Anderies, B. Campbell, C. Folke, S. Hatfield-Dodds, T. P. Hughes, and J. Wilson. 2006. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11 (1):19–19.
  • Lichter, J., H. Caron, T. S. Pasakarnis, S. L. Rodgers, T. S. Squiers, and C. S. Todd. 2006. The ecological collapse and partial recovery of a freshwater tidal ecosystem. Northeastern Naturalist 13 (2):153–78. doi:10.1656/1092–6194(2006)13[153:TECAPR]2.0.CO;2
  • Lubell, M. 2013. Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3):537–59. doi:10.1111/psj.12028
  • Lubell, M., and L. Lippert. 2011. Integrated regional water management: a study of collaboration or water politics-as-usual in California, USA. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77 (1):76–100. doi:10.1177/0020852310388367
  • Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):148–63. doi:10.2307/3088419
  • Lukacs, H. A., and N. M. Ardoin. 2014. The relationship of place re-making and watershed group participation in Appalachia. Society & Natural Resources 27 (1):55–69. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.840876
  • Maine Department of Marine Resources. 2014. “Division of sea-run fisheries trap count statistics.” Augusta, ME. http://www.maine.gov/dmr/searunfish/trapcounts.shtml (accessed August 1, 2014).
  • Margerum, R. D. 2011. Beyond consensus: Producing results from collaborative environmental planning and management. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Miles, M., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ostrom, E. 2007. Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the policy process, ed. P. A. Sabatier, 21–64. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
  • Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325 (5939):419–22. doi:10.1126/science.1172133
  • Ostrom, E., and M. Cox. 2010. Moving beyond panaceas: A multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation 37 (04):451–63. doi:10.1017/S0376892910000834
  • Prokopy, L. S., N. Mullendore, K. Brasier, and K. Floress. 2014. A typology of catalyst events for collaborative watershed management in the United States. Society & Natural Resources 27 (11):1177–91. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.918230
  • Sabatier, P., W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock. 2005. Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Spink, A., M. Hillman, K. Fryirs, G. Brierley, and K. Lloyd. 2010. Has river rehabilitation begun? Social perspectives from the Upper Hunter catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Geoforum 41 (3):399–409. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.12.003
  • Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Yin, R. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Young, O. R. 2010. Institutional dynamics: Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environmental Change 20 (3):378–85. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.