Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 30, 2017 - Issue 6
692
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
POLICY REVIEWS/ANALYSES

Commodifying Legality? Who and What Counts as Legal in the Indonesian Wood Trade

&
Pages 750-764 | Received 31 Oct 2015, Accepted 25 Aug 2016, Published online: 18 Nov 2016

References

  • Anti Forest-Mafia Coalition. 2014. SVLK flawed: An independent evaluation of Indonesia’s timber legality certification system. http://eyesontheforest.or.id/attach/Anti%20Forest%20Mafia%20Coalition%20(18 Mar14)%20SVLK%20Flawed%20FINAL.pdf (accessed September 30, 2015).
  • Bartley, T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology 113:297–351. doi:10.1086/518871
  • Bartley, T. 2014. Transnational governance and the re-centered state: Sustainability or legality? Regulation and Governance 8:93–109. doi:10.1111/rego.12051
  • BPKH XI. 2012. Potret hutan jawa-madura (Forest portrait in Java-Madura). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: BPKH XI.
  • Cashore, B., G. Auld, and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Cashore, B., and M. W. Stone. 2012. Can legality verification rescue global forest governance?: Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest Policy and Economics 18:13–22. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.005
  • Colchester, M., M. Boscolo, A. Contreras- Hermosilla, F. Del Gatto, J. Dempsey, G. Lescuyer, K. Obidzinski, D. Pommier, M. Richards, S. N. Sembiring, L. Tacconi, M. T. V. Rios, and A. Wells. 2006. Justice in the forest. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  • Daviron, B., and I. Vagneron. 2011. From commoditisation to de-commoditisation … and back again: Discussing the role of sustainability standards for agricultural products. Development Policy Review 29:91–113. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2011.00515.x
  • Ebeling, J., and M. Yasué. 2009. The effectiveness of market-based conservation in the tropics: Forest certification in Ecuador and Bolivia. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1145–53. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.003
  • European Commission. 2003. Forest law enforcement, governance and trade (FLEGT) proposal for an EU action plan. European Commission. http://www.fao.org/forestry/33093-04ee4b3cc7232ef705169b9cc20c30850.pdf (accessed September 15, 2015).
  • European Forest Institute. 2016a. FLEGTS enters a new era with major news licensing. http://www.euflegt.efi.int/news/-/asset_publisher/VoA92AEdZlro/content/flegt-enters-a-new-era-with-major-news-on-licensing (accessed March 13, 2016).
  • European Forest Institute. 2016b. VPA countries. http://www.euflegt.efi.int/vpa-countries (accessed March 13, 2016).
  • EU and Indonesia. 2011. Voluntary partnership agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Indonesia on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the European Union. Annex II. Legality definition. Final version as agreed by the European Union and the Republic of Indonesia at the 3rd Senior Officials Meeting 15 April 2011.
  • EU, Indonesia, and DFPPM. 2011. FLEGT voluntary partnership agreement between Indonesia and the European Union. Briefing note. Retrieved from http://www.euflegt.efi.int/documents/10180/23029/FLEGT+Voluntary+Partnership+Agreement+Between+the+Republic+of+Indonesia+and+the+European+Union+-+Briefing+Note+May+2011/cfcd6026-55a9-4b7f-a28d-f147d9e6c9d5 (accessed September 16, 2015).
  • Gellert, P. K. 2005. The shifting natures of “development”: Growth, crisis, and recovery in Indonesia’s forests. World Development 33:1345–64. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.004
  • Hadiyati, O. 2011. Analisis kebijakan pemenuhan bahan baku lokal terhadap kelangsungan industri mebel jati di kabupaten jepara (Policy analysis on local wood supply for teak furniture industry in Jepara District). Bogor, Indonesia: IPB.
  • Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T. Li. 2011. Powers of exclusion: Land dilemma in southeast Asia. Singapore and Manoa, HI: NUS Press and University of Hawaii Press.
  • Hoare, A. 2015. Tackling illegal logging and the related trade. London, UK: Chatham House.
  • Ika, A. 2016. Pertama di dunia, indonesia raih lisensi ekspor produk kayu FLEGT dari uni eropa (First in the world, Indonesia obtains FLEGT export license from EU). Kompas, May 13. http://bisniskeuangan.kompas.com/read/2016/05/13/103000026/Pertama.di.Dunia.Indonesia.Raih.Lisensi.Ekspor.Produk.Kayu.FLEGT.dari.Uni.Eropa
  • JPIK. 2014. SVLK in the eyes of the monitor. Bogor, Indonesia: JPIK.
  • JPIK. 2016. Loopholes in legality: How ministry of trade decree benefits shadowy timber exporters and undermines legal reforms. http://jpik.or.id (accessed March 13, 2016).
  • Kishor, N., and G. Lescuyer. 2012. Controlling illegal logging in domestic and international markets by harnessing multi-level governance opportunities. International Journal of the Commons 6:255–70. doi:10.18352/ijc.327
  • KPK. 2014. Kerentaan korupsi dalam perizinan usaha sektor kehutanan 2013 (Risks of corruption in forestry business licensing in 2013). Jakarta, Indonesia: KPK.
  • Lesniewska, F., and C. L. McDermott. 2014. FLEGT VPAs: Laying a pathway to sustainability via legality: Lessons from Ghana and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 48:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.005
  • Mahanty, S., and C. L. McDermott. 2013. How does ‘free, prior and informed consent’ (FPIC) impact social equity? Lessons from mining and forestry and their implications for REDD +. Land Use Policy 35:406–16. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.014
  • Maryudi, A. 2016. Choosing timber legality verification as a policy instrument to combat illegal logging in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 68:99–104. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.010
  • Maryudi, A., A. A. Nawir, D. B. Permadi, R. H. Purwanto, D. Pertiwi, A. Syofi’I, and P. Sudarmanto. 2015. Complex regulatory frameworks governing private smallholder tree plantations in Gunungkidul District, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 59:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.010
  • McDermott, C. L. 2013. Certification and equity: Applying an “equity framework” to compare certification schemes across product sectors and scales. Environmental Science and Policy 33:428–37. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.008
  • McDermott, C. L., B. Cashore, and P. Kanowski. 2010. Global environmental forest policies: An international comparison. London, UK: Earthscan.
  • Mutersbaugh, T. 2005. Fighting standards with standards: Harmonization, rents, and social accountability in certified agrofood networks. Environment and Planning A 37:2033–51. doi:10.1068/a37369
  • Nurrochmat, D. R., A. H. Dharmawan, K. Obidzinsky, A. Dermawan, and J. T. Erbaugh. 2016. Contesting national and international forest regime: Case of timber legality certification for community forests in central Java, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 68:54–64. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.008
  • Obidzinski, K., A. Dermawan, A. Andrianto, H. Komarudin, and D. Hernawan. 2014. The timber legality verification system and the voluntary partnership agreement (VPA) in Indonesia: Challenges for the small-scale forestry sector. Forest Policy and Economics 48:24–32. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.009
  • Obidzinski, K., and Kusters, K. 2015. Formalizing the logging sector in Indonesia: Historical dynamics and lessons for current policy initiatives. Society & Natural Resources 28:530–42. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1014605
  • Overdevest, C., and J. Zeitlin. 2014. Constructing a transnational timber legality assurance regime: Architecture, accomplishments, challenges. Forest Policy and Economics 48:6–15. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.004
  • Pacheco, P., D. Barry, P. Cronkleton, and A. M. Larson. 2008. The role of informal institutions in the use of forest resources in Latin America. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  • Putzel, L., P. O. Cerutti, Y. Artanti, and A. Kelly. 2014. Policy options for improved integration of domestic timber market under the voluntary partnership agreement (VPA) regime. Lessons from formalization case studies. Info brief. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  • Putzel, L., A. B. Kelly, P. O. Cerruti, and Y. Artati. 2015. Formalization as development in land and natural resources policy. Society & Natural Resources 28(5):453–72. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1014608
  • Rachman, F. N. 2013. Undoing categorical inequality: Masyarakat ADAT, Agrarian conflict and struggle for inclusive citizenship in Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia: Sayogyo Institute.
  • Rainforest Action Networks. 2015. False assurances: A briefing for international buyers and custom authorities on how Indonesia’s timber legality verification system fails to protect community rights. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/rainforestactionnetwork/pages/5790/attachments/original/1429822653/RAN_False_Assurances_LOW.pdf?1429822653=&awesm=a.ran.org_b26 (accessed October 16, 2015).
  • Rasad, F., and T. Febismanto. 2015. Korupsi dan HAM di sektor kehutanan: Studi kasus korupsi perizinan hutan tanaman industri di Riau (Corruption and human rights in forestry sector: A case study of corruption in forest plantation industry in Riau). Jakarta, Indonesia: Komnas HAM.
  • Situmorang, A., A. Nababan, A. N. Tarigan, H. Kartodirdjo, M. Safitri, A. Soeprihanto, and P. Sunaryo. 2015. The 2014 Indonesia forest governance index. Jakarta, Indonesia: UNDP.
  • Suprapto, E. 2010. Hutan Rakyat: Aspek Produksi, Ekologi dan Kelembagaan (Community forest: Production, ecological and institutional aspects). http://arupa.or.id/sources/uploads/2010/08/Hutan-Rakyat-Aspek-Produksi-Ekologi-dan-Kelembagaan.pdf
  • van Heeswijk, L., and E. Turnhout. 2013. The discursive structure of FLEGT (forest law enforcement, governance and trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 32:6–13. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.009
  • Wiersum, K. F., G. Lescuyer, K. S. Nketiah, and M. Wit. 2013. International forest governance regimes: Reconciling concerns on timber legality and forest-based livelihoods. Forest Policy and Economics 32:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.011

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.