The Practice of Water Policy Governance Networks: An International Comparative Case Study Analysis

References

• Agranoff, R. 2007. Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. 2013. Bridging the theoretical gap and uncovering the missing holes. In Network theory in the public sector: Building new theoretical frameworks, ed. R. Keast, M. Mandell, and R. Agranoff, 193. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arentsen, M. J. 2001. Negotiated environmental governance in the Netherlands: Logic and illustration. Policy Studies Journal 29 (3):499–513. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02106.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnouts, R., M. van der Zouwen, and B. Arts. 2012. Analysing governance modes and shifts—Governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy. Forest Policy and Economics 16:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., and P. Leroy. 2006. Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. In Institutional dynamics in environmental governance, ed. B. Arts and P. Leroy, 1–20. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, J., Head, B., and Ross, H. 2017. Crises and Institutional Change: Emergence of Cross-Border Water Governance in Lake Eyre Basin, Australia. Society & Natural Resources. doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1272729.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2011. Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism. Policy & Politics 39 (4):457–71. doi:10.1332/030557310x550141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2010. Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation & Governance 4 (2):113–34. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bréthaut, C., and G. Pflieger. 2013. The shifting territorialities of the Rhone River’s transboundary governance: A historical analysis of the evolution of the functions, uses and spatiality of river basin governance. Regional Environmental Change 15:1–10. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0541-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisbois, M. C., and R. C. de Loë. 2015. Power in collaborative approaches to governance for water: A systematic review. Society & Natural Resources 29:775–90. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1080339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, J. E., F. J. Kroon, B. Schaffelke, E. C. Wolanski, S. E. Lewis, M. J. Devlin, I. C. Bohnet, Z. T. Bainbridge, J. Waterhouse, and A. M. Davis. 2012. Terrestrial pollutant runoff to the Great Barrier Reef: An update of issues, priorities and management responses. Marine Pollution Bulletin 65 (4–9):81–100. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, J., and J. Waterhouse. 2012. A critical review of environmental management of the ‘not so Great’ Barrier Reef. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 104–5:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2012.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., M. Watson, and R. Hudson. 2007. Modes of governing municipal waste. Environment and Planning A 39 (11):2733–53. doi:10.1068/a38269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B. C., H. Gosnell, and B. A. Cosens. 2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society 19 (3):56. doi:10.5751/ES-06824-190356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, D. 2007. Water politics in the Murray-Darling basin. Canberra, Australia: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, D., and R. Q. Grafton. 2011a. Basin futures: Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin. Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, D., and R. Q. Grafton. 2011b. Water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. Water Resources Research 47 (12):W00G003. doi:10.1029/2010wr009820
   Google Scholar
• Day, J. C., and K. Dobbs. 2013. Effective governance of a large and complex cross-jurisdictional marine protected area: Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Marine Policy 41:14–24. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Delta Stewardship Council. 2013. The delta plan. Sacramento, CA: Delta Stewardship Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dengler, M. 2007. Spaces of power for action: Governance of the Everglades restudy process (1992–2000). Political Geography 26 (4):423–54. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despointes, F. H. 2009. La Loire, espace d’une gouvernance environnementale? VertigO—la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement (Hors série 6).
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, P. P. J., C. Dieperink, F. Laerhoven, H. C. Runhaar, and W. J. V. Vermeulen. 2012. Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance—Experiences from The Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (3):143–60. doi:10.1002/eet.1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. 2017. Rescaling Knowledge and Governance and Enrolling the Future in New Zealand: A Co-Production Analysis of Canterbury’s Water Management Reforms to Regulate Diffuse Pollution. Society & Natural Resources. doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1265187.
   Google Scholar
• Dutterer, A. D., and R. D. Margerum. 2014. The limitations of policy-level collaboration: A meta-analysis of CALFED. Society & Natural Resources 28 (1):21–37. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.945054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edge, S., and J. Eyles. 2015. Contested governmentalities: NGO enrollment and influence over chemical risk governance rationales and practices. Environmental Policy and Governance 25:188–200. doi:10.1002/eet.1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., A. Gerlak, O. Barreteau, M. B. ten Brink, N. Farahbakhshazad, G. Morrison, and P. Promburon. 2011. A framework to assess collaborative governance: A new look at four water resource management cases. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22:1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015a. Assessing the performance of collaborative governance regimes. In Collaborative governance regimes, ed. K. Emerson and T. Nabatchi, 180–206. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015b. Collaboration dynamics: Principled engagement, shared motivation, and the capacity for joint action. In Collaborative governance regimes, ed. K. Emerson and T. Nabatchi, 57–80. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., and T. Heikkila. 2011. Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21:619–44. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrin, J. 2013. Le développement durable comme légitimation de l’action publique. Le cas des inondations du Rhône. In Les Cahiers du CRGRNT: Université du Quebec en Outaouais.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrin, J. 2014. A floodplain restoration project on the River Rhône(France): Analyzing challenges to its implementation. Regional Environmental Change 15: 559–68. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0650-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrin, J., G. Bouleau, and F. Grelot. 2014. “Functional fit” versus “politics of scale” in the governance of floodplain retention capacity. Journal of Hydrology 519:2405–14. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanak, E. 2011. Managing California’s water: From conflict to reconciliation. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, M. A. 1998. Science and environmental decision-making in South Florida. Ecological Applications 8 (3):580–90. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0580:SAEDMI]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., and A. K. Gerlak. 2014. Investigating collaborative processes over time a 10-year study of the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. American Review of Public Administration 46:180–200. doi:10.1177/0275074014544196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertting, N., and E. Vedung. 2012. Purposes and criteria in network governance evaluation: How far does standard evaluation vocabulary takes us? Evaluation 18 (1):27–46. doi:10.1177/1356389011431021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, C. 2010. Facilitating monitoring, subverting self-interest and limiting discretion: Learning from new forms of accountability in practice. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 35:127.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. P., J. C. Day, and J. Brodie. 2015. Securing the future of the Great Barrier Reef. Nature Climate Change 5:508–11. doi:10.1038/nclimate2604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. 2003. Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review 5 (3):401–23. doi:10.1080/1471903032000146964.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. E. Vangen. 2005. Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., D. E. Booher, and S. Di Vittorio. 2010. Strategies for megaregion governance. Journal of the American Planning Association 77 (1):55–67. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.533640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, R., and D. Watson. 2007. Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland’s water. Ecology and Society 12 (1):21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., R. K. W. Wurzel, and A. Zito. 2005. The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies 53 (3):477–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast, R. L., M. Mandell, and K. A. Brown. 2006. Mixing state, market and network governance modes: The role of government in “crowded” policy domains. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 9 (1):27.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. 2006. Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review 66 (s1):10–19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00662.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H. 2008. Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review 10 (4):505–25. doi:10.1080/14719030802263954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2000. Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory 2 (2):135–58. doi:10.1080/14719030000000007.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., and C. Skelcher. 2007. Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration 85 (3):587–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as governance. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, P., P. P. J. Driessen, A. Sauer, B. Bornemann, and P. Burger. 2013. Governing towards sustainability– Conceptualizing modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 15 (3):403–25. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.769414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, O. 2015. The governmentality of meta-governance. Identifying theoretical and empirical challenges of network governance in the political field of security and beyond. Doctor of Philosophy, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Layzer, J. A. 2008a. Recreating central Florida’s meandering Kissimmee River. In Natural experiments: Ecosystem-based management and the environment, ed. J. A. Layzer, 205–32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layzer, J. A. 2008b. Restoring South Florida’s river of grass. In Natural experiments: Ecosystem-based management and the environment, ed. J. A. Layzer, 103–36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little Hoover Commission. 2005. Still imperiled, still important. The Little Hoover Commission’s review of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Sacramento, CA: Little Hoover Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Little Hoover Commission. 2010. Managing for change: Modernizing California’s water governance. Sacramento, CA: Little Hoover Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., A. Gerlak, T. Heikkila, J. F. Warner, A. Van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos. 2013. CalFed and collaborative watershed management: Success despite failure. In Making space for the river: Governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe, ed. J. F. Warner, A. Van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos, 63–78. London, UK: IWA Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Lurie, S. D. 2011. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program: Lessons from the rise and fall of a large-scale ecosystem management network. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3 (3):251–62. doi:10.1080/19390459.2011.591764.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P., and T. Steelman. 2003. Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations the importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review 5 (2):197–224. doi:10.1080/1461667032000066417.
   Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. 2011. Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. R., D. Connell, and B. M. Taylor. 2013. Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: A century of polycentric experiments in cross-border integration of water resources management. International Journal of Water Governance 1 (3):197–218. doi:10.7564/13-IJWG14.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., and R. Agranoff. 2011. The limitations of public management networks. Public Administration 89 (2):265–84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, K. 2009. Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy 29 (3):465–86. doi:10.518010.1177/0261018309105180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, L. 2008. Metagovernance as the governance of governance. In Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets: The feasibility of designing and managing governance style combinations, ed. L. Meuleman, 66–86. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., and O. Fritsch. 2009. Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level - and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (3):197–214. doi:10.1002/eet.509.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. 2014. Networks and networking: The public administrative agendas. Public Administration Review 75:361–71. doi:10.1111/puar.12281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., G. Holtz, B. Kastens, and C. Knieper. 2010. Analyzing complex water governance regimes: The management and transition framework. Environmental Science & Policy 13 (7):571–81. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2005. Governing complex societies. Trajectories and scenarios. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Poteete, A. R., M. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2010. Small-N case studies: Putting the commons under a magnifying glass. In Working together. Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice, ed. A. R. Poteete, M. Janssen, and E. Ostrom, 31–63. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. Kenis. 2007. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2):229–52. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 2001. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61 (4):414–23. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, P. J. 2005. Restructuring state institutions: The limits of adaptive leadership. In Adaptive governance and water conflict, ed. J. Scholz and B. Stiftel, 204–12. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 44 (4):652–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies 28 (8):1243–64. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, L., and S. Dovers. 2007. NRM regions in Australia: The “haves” and the “have nots.” Geographical Research 45 (3):273–90. doi:10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00460.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. J., R. Eberhard, T. Wallington, and M. Lane. 2010. Using knowledge to make collaborative policy-level decisions in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Brisbane: CSIRO water for a healthy country technical report, Australia. http://www/.clw.csiro.au/publications/waterforahealthycountry/2010/wfhc-GBR-collaborative-decisions.pdf (accessed 4 August 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. J., R. D. Margerum, T. M. Koontz, C. Moseley, and S. Lurie. 2011. Policy-level collaboratives for environmental management at the regional scale: Lessons and challenges from Australia and the United States. Society & Natural Resources 24 (8):849–59. doi:10.1080/08941920.2010.487848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode, S. 2010. De l’aménagement au ménagement des cours d’eau: Le bassin de la Loire, miroir de l’évolution des rapports entre aménagement fluvial et environnement. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. 506. http://cybergeo.revues.org/23253 (accessed 24 January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and P. Miller. 1992. Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology 43:173–205. doi:10.2307/591464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A., and D. Connell. 2014. The evolution of river basin management in the Murray-Darling Basin. In The politics of river basin organisations: Coalitions, institutional design choices and consequences, ed. D. Huitema and S. Meijerink, 326–55. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A., and S. Dovers. 2008. Making the harder yards: Environmental policy integration in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67 (3):245–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00585.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangaré, I., and C. Larrue. 2002. The evolution of the national water regime in France. Tours, France: Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, Centre de Recherche, Ville Société Territoire (VST).
   Google Scholar
• Sending, O. J., and I. B. Neumann. 2006. Governance to governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly 50 (3):651–72. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00418.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2007a. Metagovernance. In Theories of democratic network governance, ed. E. Sorensen and J. Torfing, 167–231. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2007b. Introduction. Governance network research: Towards a second generation. In Theories of democratic network governance, ed. E. Sørensen and J. Torfing, 1–25. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E., and R. Savolainen. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stenson, K. 2008. Governing the local: Sovereignty, social governance and community safety. Social Work & Society 6 (1):2–14.
   Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J., B. Arts, and P. Leroy. 2000. Political modernisation and the environment: The renewal of environmental policy arrangements. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vella, K., N. Sipe, A. Dale, and B. Taylor. 2015. Not learning from the past: Adaptive governance challenges for Australian Natural Resource Management. Geographical Research 53 (4):379–92. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voets, J., W. Van Dooren, and F. De Rynck. 2008. A framework for assessing the performance of policy networks. Public Management Review 10 (6):773–90. doi:10.1080/14719030802423129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreugdenhil, H., J. Slinger, A. Smits, and E. Kater. 2008. Impacts of governance styles on river restoration in NW Europe. Conference of the International Association of Impact Assessments, Perth, Australia, May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhouse, J., M. Grundy, I. Gordon, J. Brodie, R. Eberhard, and H. Yorkston. 2009. Managing the catchments of the Great Barrier Reef. In Handbook of catchment management, ed. R. Ferrier and J. Jenkins, 351–75. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods, vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar