831
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CRISES OF ACCESS

Women’s Crucial Role in Collective Operation and Maintenance of Drinking Water Infrastructure in Rural Uganda

, &
Pages 506-520 | Received 27 Sep 2015, Accepted 29 Nov 2016, Published online: 01 Mar 2017

References

  • Agarwal, B. 2000. Conceptualising environmental collective action: Why gender matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (3):283–10. doi:10.1093/cje/24.3.283
  • Asiimwe, G. B., and R. Naiga. 2015. Towards understanding challenges to water access in Uganda. In Water is life, ed. S. Linnane, K. G. McGuigan, H. Fagan, and A. Rugumayo 59–72. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
  • Asingwire, N. 2008. Shifting paradigms in social policy reform: A case of demand versus supply-driven approaches to safe water supply in Uganda. PhD dissertation, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Baker, T. J., B. Cullen, L. Debevec, and Y. Abebe. 2015. A socio-hydrological approach for incorporating gender into biophysical models and implications for water resources research. Applied Geography 62:325–38. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.008
  • Baland, J. M., and J. P. Platteau. 1999. The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management. World Development 27 (5):773–88. doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(99)00026-1
  • Cleaver, F. 1998. Choice, complexity, and change: Gendered livelihoods and the management of water. Agriculture and Human Values 15:293–99.
  • Crow, B., B. Swallow, and I. Asamba. 2012. Community organised household water increases not only rural incomes, but also men’s work. World Development 40 (3):528–41. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.08.002
  • Directorate of Water Development. 2011a. Assessment of the effectiveness of the community-based maintenance system for rural water supply facilities. Kampala, Uganda: DWD.
  • Directorate of Water Development. 2011b. Updated national framework for operation and maintenance of rural water supplies in Uganda. Kampala, Uganda: DWD.
  • Ellis, F. 2000. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Global Water Partnership. 2002. Dialogue on effective water governance. Stockholm, Sweden: Global Water Partnership.
  • Goldin, J. A. 2010. Water policy in South Africa: Trust and knowledge as obstacles to reform. Review of Radical Political Economics 422:195–212. doi:10.1177/0486613410368496
  • Government of Uganda. 1997. The national gender policy. Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development.
  • Government of Uganda. 1999. National water policy. Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Water and Environment.
  • International Conference on Freshwater. 2001. Conference report, Bonn, Germany, December 3–7. www.Water-2001.de (accessed September 22, 2015).
  • International Conference on Water, and the Environment. 1992. Development issues for the 21st century. The Dublin statement report. Janurary 26–31. Dublin, Ireland: ICWE.
  • Meinzen-Dick, R., L. Pandolfelli, S. Dohrn, and J. Athens. 2006. Gender and collective action: A conceptual framework for analysis. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), June 19–23, Bali, Indonesia.
  • Meinzen-Dick, R., and M. Zwarteveen. 1998. Gendered participation in water management: Issues and illustrations from users’ associations in South Asia. Agriculture and Human Values 15:337–45.
  • Mpalanyi, M. J., C. Kabonesa, and A. Staines. 2015. Lived experiences of women as principal gatekeepers of water management in rural Uganda. In Water is life, ed. S. Linnane, K. G. McGuigan, H. Fagan, and A. Rugumayo 31–42. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
  • Mugumya, F. 2013. Enabling community-based water management systems: Governance and sustainability of rural point-water facilities in Uganda. PhD dissertation, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Naiga, R., and M. Penker. 2014. Determinants of users’ willingness to contribute to safe water provision in rural Uganda. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government 12 (3):695–714. doi:10.4335/12.3.695-714(2014)
  • Naiga, R., M. Penker, and K. Hogl. 2015. Challenging pathways to safe water access in rural Uganda: From supply to demand-driven water governance. International Journal of the Commons 9 (1):237–60. doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.480
  • Nakano, Y., and K. Otsuka. 2011. Determinants of household contributions to collective irrigation management: The case of the Doho Rice Scheme in Uganda. Environment and Development Economics 16:527–51. doi:10.1017/s1355770x11000167
  • Narayan, D. 1995. The contribution of people’s participation: Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. ESD occasional paper series no. 1. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Nkonya, E., J. Pender, and E. Kato. 2008. Who know, who cares? The determinants of enactment, awareness, and compliance with community natural resources management regulations in Uganda. Environment and Development Economics 13:79–101. doi:10.1017/s1355770x0700407x
  • O’Reilly, K. 2006. “Traditional” women, “modern” water: Linking gender and commodification in Rajasthan, India. Geoforum 37:958–72. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.05.008
  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ostrom, E. 2007. Going beyond panaceas, Special feature: A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39):15181–87.
  • Ostrom, E. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1):7–27. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
  • Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker. 1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Pandolfelli, L., R. Meinzen-Dick, and S. Dohrn. 2008. Gender and collective action: Motivations, effectiveness and impact. Journal of International Development 20:1–11. doi:10.1002/jid.1424
  • Poteete, A. R., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2010. Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Poteete, A. R., and E. Ostrom. 2004. Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change 35 (3):435–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
  • Prokopy, L. S. 2004. Women’s participation in rural water supply projects in India: Is it moving beyond tokenism and does it matter? Water Policy 6:727–56.
  • Singh, N. 2007. Women’s participation in local water governance: Understanding institutional contradictions. Gender, Technology and Development 10 (1):61–76. doi:10.1177/097185240501000104
  • Singh, N. 2008. Equitable gender participation in local water governance: An insight into institutional paradoxes. Water Resources Management 22:925–42. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9202-z
  • Sultana, P., and P. Thompson. 2008. Gender and local floodplain management institutions: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of International Development 20:53–68. doi:10.1002/jid.1427
  • Upadhyay, B. 2004. Gender roles and multiple uses of water in North Gujarat. Working paper 70. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka.
  • Van Houweling, E. 2015. “A good wife brings her husband bath water”: Gender roles and water practices in Nampula, Mozambique. Society & Natural Resources 29 (9):1065–78. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1095377
  • Wambu, C. K., and M. Kindiki. 2015. Gender disparities in water resources management projects in Njoro Sub-county, Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences Studies 3 (2):123–29. doi:10.11114/ijsss.v3i2.703
  • Whittington, D., J. Davis, L. Prokopy, K. Komives, R. Thorstens, H. Lukacs, A. Bakalian, and W. Wakeman. 2008. How well is the demand-driven, community management model for rural water supply systems doing? Evidence from Bolivia, Peru, and Ghana. Brooks World Poverty Institute (BWPI) Working Paper 22. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • World Bank. 1999. Decentralisation: Critical implementation issues for rural water supply and sanitation sub-sector in Uganda. A consultancy report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.