On Resurrected Nuggets and Sphincter Windows: Cultured Meat, Art, and the Discursive Subsumption of Nature

References

• Agapakis, C. 2014. Growing the future of meat. In The in vitro meat cookbook, ed. K. van Mensvoort and J. Grievink, 117–22. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bispublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baroni, L., L. Cenci, M. Tettamanti, and M. Berati. 2007. Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 61 (2):279–86. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1972. Mythologies. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). 2013. World’s first lab-grown burger is eaten in London. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-23576143 (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Belasco, W. 2006. Meals to come: A history of the future of food. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjaminson, M. A., J. A. Gilcriest, and M. Lorenz. 2002. In vitro edible muscle protein production system (MPPS): Stage 1, fish. Acta Astronautica 51 (12):879–89. doi:10.1016/s0094-5765(02)00033-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, T. 1989. Marxism and natural limits: An ecological critique and reconstruction. New Left Review 178:51–86.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, W., W. S. Prudham, and R. A. Schurman. 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society and Natural Resources 14 (7):555–70. doi:10.1080/089419201750341862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. 2003. Hope against hype—Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies 16 (2):3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and M. Michael. 2003. A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 15 (1):3–18. doi:10.1080/0953732032000046024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumpus, A. G. 2011. The matter of carbon: Understanding the materiality of tCO2e in carbon offsets. Antipode 43 (3):612–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00879.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruth, A. 2013. Culturing food: Bioart and in vitro meat. Parallax 19 (1):88–100. doi:10.1080/13534645.2013.743296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 1995. The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode 27 (1):12–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00260.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, O., and I. Zurr. 2002. Growing semi-living sculptures: The tissue culture and art project. Leonardo 35 (4):365–70. doi:10.1162/002409402760181123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, O., and I. Zurr. 2005. Ingestion/disembodied cuisine. http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/16/catts_zurr.php (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Catts, O., and I. Zurr. 2008. The ethics of experimental engagement with the manipulation of life. In Tactical biopolitics: Art, activism, and technoscience, ed. B. da Costa and K. Philip, 125–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, O., and I. Zurr. 2013. Disembodied livestock: The promise of a semi-living Utopia. Parallax 19 (1):101–13. doi:10.1080/13534645.2013.752062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, O., and I. Zurr. 2014. Growing for different ends. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 56:20–29. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2014.09.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. 2008. Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• da Costa, B. 2008. Reaching the limit: When art becomes science. In Tactical biopolitics: Art, activism, and technoscience, ed. B. da Costa and K. Philip, 366–85. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Datar, I. 2015. Isha Datar keynote: Food of the future—The post-animal bioeconomy. http://sxsweco.com/news/2015/isha-datar-keynote-food-future-video (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Datar, I. 2016. In vitro meat is … cultured. Food Phreaking 2:16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Datar, I., and R. Bolton. 2014. The carnery. In The in vitro meat cookbook, ed. K. van Mensvoort and J. Grievink, 151–59. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bispublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, K. 2013. Living factories: Biotechnology and the unique nature of capitalism. Montreal, QC, Canada: Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortun, M. 2001. Mediated speculations in the genomics futures markets. New Genetics and Society 20 (2):139–56. doi:10.1080/14636770120070240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortun, M. 2012. Genomics scandals and other volatilities of promising. In Lively capital: biotechnologies, ethics, and governance in global markets, ed. K. Sunder Rajan, 329–53. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, P. J., H. Steinfeld, B. Henderson, A. Mottet, C. Opio, J. Dijkman, A. Falcucci, and G. Tempio. 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock—A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Haagsman, H. P., K. J. Hellingwerf, and B. A. J. Roelen. 2009. Production of animal proteins by cell systems: Desk study on cultured meat (‘kweekvlees’). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1994. A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations 2 (1):59–71. doi:10.1353/con.1994.0009
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2004. The Haraway reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, M. 2010. Don’t build your home, grow it! https://www.ted.com/talks/mitchell_joachim_don_t_build_your_home_grow_it#t-152600 (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, M. 2014. Architecture: Grow a home. In Super cells: Building with biology, ed. M. Joachim and N. Tandon, 25–35. New York, NY: Ted Books.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, M., and N. Tandon. 2014. Super cells: Building with biology. New York, NY: Ted Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, E. 2016. Benevolent technotopias and hitherto unimaginable meats: Tracing the promises of in vitro meat. Social Studies of Science 46 (5):725–48. doi:10.1177/0306312716658561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, E. 2017. Att ta djuret ur ekvationen: Bioteknik, entreprenörsaktivism och köttets politiska ekologi [To take the animal out of the equation: Biotechnology, entrepreneurial activism, and the political ecology of meat]. In Politisk ekologi: Om makt och miljöer [Political ecology: On power and environments], ed. E. Jönsson and E. Andersson, 305–32. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Landecker, H. 2009. Culturing life: How cells became technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landecker, H. 2016. It is what it eats: Chemically defined media and the history of surrounds. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:148–60. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langelaan, M. L. P., K. J. M. Boonen, R. B. Polak, F. B. T. Baaijens, M. J. Post, and D. W. J. van der Schaft. 2010. Meet the new meat: Tissue engineered skeletal muscle. Trends in Food Science and Technology 21 (2):59–66. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levins, R., and R. Lewontin. 1985. The dialectical biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maastricht University. 2013. What is cultured beef? http://culturedbeef.net/what-is-it (accessed December 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Marinetti, F. T. 1909. The futurist manifesto. http://bactra.org/T4PM/futurist-manifesto.html (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital: A critique of political economy, vol. 1. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mattick, C. S., A. E. Landis, B. R. Allenby, and N. J. Genovese. 2015. Anticipatory life cycle analysis of in vitro biomass cultivation for cultured meat production in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 49:11941–49. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz, M. S. M., S. E. L. Verbruggen, and M. J. Post. 2015. Alternatives for large-scale production of cultured beef: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14 (2):208–16. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60889-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, D. 1994. American technological sublime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. 1988. Capitalism, nature, socialism: A theoretical introduction. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 1 (1):11–38. doi:10.1080/10455758809358356
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. 1998. Natural causes: Essays in ecological Marxism. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, K., A. Fotopoulou, and N. Stephens. 2017. The first bite: Imaginaries, promotional publics and the laboratory grown burger. Public Understanding of Science 26 (2):148–63. doi:10.1177/0963662516639001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, M. J. 2014a. Cultured beef: Medical technology to produce food. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94 (6):1039–41. doi:10.1002/jsfa.6474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, M. J. 2014b. No future for traditional meat. In The in vitro meat cookbook, ed. K. van Mensvoort and J. Grievink, 47–51. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bispublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Prudham, S. 2003. Taming trees: Capital, science, and nature in pacific slope tree improvement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (3):636–56. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.9303007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudham, S. 2005. Knock on wood: Nature as commodity in Douglas-fir country. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M. 2004. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35 (3):361–73. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M. 2006. The nature that capital can see: Science, state and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (3):367–87. doi:10.1068/d3304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M. 2012. Measurement and alienation: Making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (3):386–401. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00476.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, H., and S. Rose. 2014. Genes, cells and brains: The Promethean promises of the new biology. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rutjens, M. 2015. Serum-free culture of bovine satellite cells. Paper presented at First International Symposium on Cultured Meat, Maastricht, the Netherlands, October 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2008. Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N., and M. Ruivenkamp. 2016. Promise and ontological ambiguity in the in vitro meat imagescape: From laboratory myotubes to the cultured burger. Science as Culture 25 (3):327–55. doi:10.1080/09505431.2016.1171836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunder Rajan, K. 2012. Introduction: The capitalization of life and the liveliness of capital. In Lively capital: biotechnologies, ethics, and governance in global markets, ed. K. Sunder Rajan, 1–41. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taussig, K. S., K. Hoeyer, and S. Helmreich. 2013. The anthropology of potentiality in biomedicine: An introduction to supplement 7. Current Anthropology 54 (S7):S3–14. doi:10.1086/671401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terreform1. n.d. In vitro meat habitat. http://www.terreform.org/projects_habitat_meat.html (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Tuomisto, H. L., and M. J. Teixeira de Mattos. 2011. Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Science and Technology 45 (14):6117–23. doi:10.1021/es200130u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutton, R. 2011. Promising pessimism: Reading the futures to be avoided in biotech. Social Studies of Science 41 (3):411–29. doi:10.1177/0306312710397398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twine, R. 2010. Animals as biotechnology: Ethics, sustainability and critical animal studies. Washington, DC: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1992. Convention on biological diversity. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• van der Weele, C., and C. Driessen. 2013. Emerging profiles for cultured meat; ethics through and as design. Animals 3 (3):647–62. doi:10.3390/ani3030647
   Google Scholar
• van Eelen, W., van Kooten, W., and W. Westerhof. 1999. Industrial scale production of meat from in vitro cell cultures. http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/WO1999031222 (accessed January 8, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• van Mensvoort, K. 2014. Foreword. In The in vitro meat cookbook, ed. K. van Mensvoort and J. Grievink, 6–7. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bispublishers.
   Google Scholar
• van Mensvoort, K., and J. Grievink, 2014. The in vitro meat cookbook. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bispublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. 2015. Thinking like a mall: Environmental philosophy after the end of nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. 2013. The ecological hoofprint: The global burden of industrial livestock. New York, NY: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1980. Problems in materialism and culture. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar