Transitions to Energy and Climate Security in Southeast Asia? Civil Society Encounters with Illiberalism in Thailand and Myanmar

References

• Amnesty International. 2004. Thailand: Memorandum on human rights concerns. New York: Amnesty International.
   Google Scholar
• Ardeth Thawnghmung. 2016. The Myanmar Elections 2015: Why the National League for Democracy won a landslide victory. Critical Asian Studies 48 (1):132–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. 2012. Myanmar: Energy sector initial assessment. Manila: Asian Development Bank (ADB).
   Google Scholar
• Australian National University. 2017. Kay Dancey and the ANU College of Asia and the Pacific CartoGIS team. Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, I. G. 2011. The Don Sahong Dam: Potential impacts on regional fish migrations, livelihoods, and human health. Critical Asian Studies 43 (2):211–35. doi:10.1080/14672715.2011.570567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. 2016. The 2014 Thai coup and some roots of authoritarianism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 46 (3):388–404. doi:10.1080/00472336.2016.1150500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., R. A. Matthew, and K. L. O’Brien. 2010. Global environmental change and human security: An introduction. In Global environmental change and human security, ed. R. A Matthew, J. Barnett, B. McDonald, and K. L O’Brien, 3–32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M. 2010. The coming of environmental authoritarianism. Environmental Politics 19 (2):276–94. doi:10.1080/09644010903576918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. A., and K. Jayasuriya. 1995. Understanding illiberal democracy: A Framework. In Towards illiberal democracy in Pacific Asia, ed. D. A. Bell, D. Brown, K. Jayasuriya, and D. Martin-Jones, 1–16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T. 2014. Political opportunity structures in dictatorships? Explaining ENGO existence in autocratic regimes. The Journal of Environment & Development 23 (4):446–71. doi:10.1177/1070496514536396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. L. 2001. Explaining state‐environmental NGO relations in the Philippines and Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 22 (1):15–37. doi:10.1111/1467-9493.00091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavalit Pichalai. 2015. Thailand’s power development plan 2015 (PDP 2015) (PowerPoint presentation). Bangkok: Director General, Thai Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and N. Longhurst. 2016. Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5):585–607. doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1110483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corben, R. 2016. Analysts: Thai Military Looks to Extend Government Oversight. VOA. 10 August. Accessed 17 November 2017. https://www.voanews.com/a/legal-experts-thai-military-looking-to-extend-governmentoversight/3458313.html
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 2002. Elections without democracy: Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy 13 (2):21–35. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, T. 2000. Green power: The environment movement in Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, T., and A. Simpson. 2006. Traversing more than speed bumps: Green politics under authoritarian regimes in Burma and Iran. Environmental Politics 15 (5):750–67. doi:10.1080/09644010600937199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 2016. National identities, international roles, and the legitimation of climate leadership: Germany and Norway compared. Environmental Politics 25 (1):180–201. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1076278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egreteau, R. 2016. Caretaking democratization: The military and political change in Myanmar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M., M. Gillan, and H. H. Thein. 2016. From cronyism to oligarchy? Privatisation and business elites in Myanmar. Journal of Contemporary Asia 46 (1):18–41. doi:10.1080/00472336.2015.1072731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T. 2001. Environmental social movements in Thailand: How important is class? Asian Journal of Social Sciences 29 (1):35–51. doi:10.1163/156853101x00316.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D. J., W. Longhofer, and E. Schofer. 2007. World society, NGOs and environmental policy reform in Asia. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48 (4):275–95. doi:10.1177/0020715207079530.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., and J. R. Wollscheid. 2007. Democratic institutions versus autocratic regimes: The case of environmental policy. Public Choice 130 (3–4):381–93. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9093-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31 (8–9):1257–74. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley, B. 2012. Authoritarian environmentalism and China’s response to climate change. Environmental Politics 21 (2):287–307. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.651904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Myanmar. 2015. Myanmar energy master plan. Naypyitaw: National Energy Management Committee: Government of Myanmar, Asian Development Bank, Intelligent Energy Systems, Myanmar International Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Greacen, C. S., and C. Greacen. 2004. Thailand’s electricity reforms: Privatization of benefits and socialization of costs and risks. Pacific Affairs 77 (3):517–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haacke, J. 2010. China’s role in the pursuit of security by Myanmar’s State Peace and Development Council: Boon and bane? The Pacific Review 23 (1):113–37. doi:10.1080/09512740903501982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, G. P., and P. J. G. Pearson. 2013. Challenges of the transition to a low carbon, more electric future: From here to 2050. Energy Policy 52:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewison, K. 2014a. Considerations on inequality and politics in Thailand. Democratization 21 (4):846–66. doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.882910.
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, K. 2014b. Thailand: The lessons of protest. Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia 50 (1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. 1997. The politics of the environment: Opposition and legitimacy. In Political change in Thailand: Democracy and participation, ed. K. Hewison, 179–94. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. 2001. Globalisation, regionalisation and local voices: The Asian Development Bank and re-scaled politics of environment in the Mekong Region. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 22 (3):237–51. doi:10.1111/1467-9493.00108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, C. 2012. Addressing climate change and promoting democracy abroad: Compatible agendas? Democratization 19 (5):974–92. doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.709691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2015. Thailand: Statistics for this country. International Energy Agency. Accessed 17 February 2016. http://www.iea.org/countries/non-membercountries/thailand/statistics/.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K., and G. Rodan. 2007. Beyond hybrid regimes: More participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization 14 (5):773–94. doi:10.1080/13510340701635647.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 2014a. Explaining Myanmar’s transition: The periphery is central. Democratization 21 (5):780–802. doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.863878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 2014b. The political economy of Myanmar’s transition. Journal of Contemporary Asia 44 (1):144–70. doi:10.1080/00472336.2013.764143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J. 2017. Strategies of successful anti-dam movements: Evidence from Myanmar and Thailand. Society and Natural Resources 1–17. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1364455.
   Google Scholar
• Kreft, S., and D. Eckstein. 2013. Global climate risk index 2014. Bonn: Germanwatch.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, V. 2014. Making governance “good”: The production of scale in the Environmental Impact Assessment and governance of the Salween River. Conservation and Society 12 (4):386–97. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.155582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, A. P. 2013. From military rule to electoral authoritarianism: The reconfiguration of power in Myanmar and its future. Asian Affairs: An American Review 40 (1):20–36. doi:10.1080/00927678.2013.759479.
   Google Scholar
• Mehling, M., and A. Vihma. 2017. ‘ Mourning for America’: Donald Trump’s climate change policy. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs. 11 October 2017. Accessed 20 October 2017. http://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/713/mourning_for_america/.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, W. 2004. Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization 11 (5):33–58. doi:10.1080/13510340412331304598.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, C. 2016. Sustainable electricity transition in Thailand and the role of civil society. In Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace, ed. H. G. Brauch, Ú. O. Spring, J. Grin, and J. Scheffran, 831–51. Springer: London.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry. 2015. Myanmar’s intended nationally determined contribution - INDC. Yangon: Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry (MOECAF), The Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
   Google Scholar
• Network of People. 2015. Open letter: People’s demand to cancel PDP2015 and start a new transparent process. Network of people affected by Power Development Plan 2015 (PDP 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. 2002. Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research 39 (2):139–64. doi:10.1177/0022343302039002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavin Chachavalpongpun. 2014. The politics of international sanctions: The 2014 coup in Thailand. Journal of International Affairs 68 (1):169–85.
   Google Scholar
• Piya Pangsapa, and M. J. Smith. 2008. Political economy of Southeast Asian borderlands: Migration, environment, and developing country firms. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (4):485–514. doi:10.1080/00472330802309369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raweewan Bhuridej. 2015. Submission by Thailand to UNFCCC: Intended nationally determined contribution and relevant information. Bangkok: Secretary General, Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, J. 1991. Thailand’s Nam Choan Dam project: A case study in the ‘greening’ of South-East Asia. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 1 (2):42–54. doi:10.2307/2997414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahar, D. C. 2015. Rejecting eco-authoritarianism, again. Environmental Values 24 (3):345–66. doi:10.3197/096327114x13947900181996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearman, D., and J. W. Smith. 2007. The climate change challenge and the failure of democracy. CT: Praeger Publishers: Westport.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2007. The environment-energy security nexus: Critical analysis of an energy ‘love triangle’ in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly 28 (3):539–54. doi:10.1080/01436590701192710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2013. Challenging hydropower development in Myanmar (Burma): Cross-border activism under a regime in transition. The Pacific Review 26 (2):129–52. doi:10.1080/09512748.2012.759264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2017a. Energy, governance and security in Thailand and Myanmar (Burma): A critical approach to environmental politics in the South. Updated ed. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2017b. The extractive industries transparency initiative: New openings for civil society in Myanmar. In The business of transition: Law reform, development and economics in Myanmar, ed. M. Crouch, 55–80. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2017c. Dark clouds over Rakhine State. East Asia Forum. 19 September. Accessed 20 October 2017. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/09/19/dark-clouds-over-rakhine-state/.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., I. Holliday, and N. Farrelly. 2018. Myanmar futures. In Routledge handbook of contemporary Myanmar, ed. A. Simpson, N. Farrelly, and I. Holliday. Routledge: London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., and S. Park. 2013. The Asian Development Bank as a global risk regulator in Myanmar. Third World Quarterly 34 (10):1858–71. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.851911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, M. 2015. Southeast Asian energy transitions: Between modernity and sustainability. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, M. 2017. The new (fragmented) geography of carbon market mechanisms: Governance challenges from Thailand and Vietnam. Global Environmental Politics 17 (3):69–90. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, M., and C. Middleton. 2014. New arenas of engagement at the water governance-climate finance nexus? An analysis of boom and bust of hydropower CDM in Vietnam. Water Alternatives 7 (3):561–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C., and C. Fox. 2008. Struggles over dams as struggles for justice: The World Commission on Dams (WCD) and anti-dam campaigns in Thailand and Mozambique. Society and Natural Resources 21 (7):625–40. doi:10.1080/08941920701744231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South, A. 2009. Ethnic politics in Burma: States of conflict. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Subbarao, S., and B. Lloyd. 2011. Can the clean development mechanism (CDM) deliver? Energy Policy 39 (3):1600–11. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thitinan Pongsudhirak. 2012. Thailand’s uneasy passage. Journal of Democracy 23 (2):47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerayooth Kanchoochat, and K. Hewison. 2016. Understanding Thailand’s politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia 46 (3):371–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, M. J. 2013. The ‘‘wages of Burmanness’’: Ethnicity and Burman privilege in contemporary Myanmar. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43 (1):1–27. doi:10.1080/00472336.2012.730892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. L. 2015. Civil society and democratisation in Southeast Asia: What is the connection? In Routledge handbook of Southeast Asian democratization, ed. W. Case, 135–46. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, K. 2011. Ceasefire capitalism: Military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China borderlands. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):747–70. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWF, IES, MKE, Spectrum, and REAM. 2016. Myanmar’s electricity vision: Updating master national electrification plan. Yangon: WWF, Intelligent Energy Systems (IES), Mekong Economics Ltd. (MKE), Spectrum, Renewable Energy Association Myanmar (REAM).
   Google Scholar