515
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Dual Importance of Political Identity in Environmental Governance: The Case of Oil and Gas Policy in Colorado

&
Pages 1230-1247 | Received 24 Aug 2017, Accepted 17 Mar 2018, Published online: 11 Jun 2018

References

  • Anderson, B. J., and G. L. Theodori. 2009. Local leaders’ perceptions of energy development in the Barnett shale. Southern Rural Sociology 24 (1):113–129.
  • Ansolabehere, S., and D. M. Konisky. 2009. Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants. Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (3):566–577. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp041.
  • Arceneaux, K. 2008. Can partisan cues diminish democratic accountability? Political Behavior 30 (2):139–160. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9044-7.
  • Ashforth, B. E., and F. Mael. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review 14 (1):20–39. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999.
  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Beck, U. 2009. World at risk. Malden, MA: Polity.
  • Bell, S. E. 2013. Our roots run deep as ironweed: Appalachian women and the fight for environmental justice. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Bell, S. E., and Y. A. Braun. 2010. Coal, identity, and the gendering of environmental justice activism in Central Appalachia. Gender and Society 24 (6):794–813. doi:10.1177/0891243210387277.
  • Bell, S. E., and R. York. 2010. Community economic identity: The coal industry and ideology construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociology 75 (1):111–143. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00004.x.
  • Boholm, A., and H. Corvellec. 2011. A relational theory of risk. Journal of Risk Research 14 (2):175–190. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.515313.
  • Bostrom, A., M. M. Granger, F. Baruch, and D. Read. 1994. What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis 14 (6):959–970. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065.x.
  • Boudet, H., C. Clarke, D. Bugden, E. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, and A. Leiserowitz. 2014. Fracking’ controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65:57–67. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017.
  • Brulle, R. J. 2014. Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of US climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change 122 (4):681–694. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
  • Ceresola, R. G., and J. Crowe. 2015. Community leaders perspectives on shale development in the New Albany shale. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 30 (1):62–86.
  • Clarke, C. E., D. Bugden, P. S. Hart, R. C. Stedman, J. B. Jacquet, D. T. Evensen, and H. S. Boudet. 2016. How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. Energy Policy 97:301–309. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.032.
  • Clarke, C. E., P. S. Hart, J. P. Schuldt, D. Evensen, H. Boudet, J. B. Jacquet, and R. Stedman. 2015. Public opinion on energy development: the interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy 81:131–140. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.019.
  • Cohen, G. L. 2003. Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (5):808–822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808.
  • Colborn, T., C. Kwiatkowski, K. Schultz, and M. Bachran. 2011. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 17 (5):1039–1056. doi:10.1080/10807039.2011.605662.
  • Converse, P. E. 2000. Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1):331–353. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.331.
  • Cook, J. J. 2014. Who’s regulating who? Analyzing fracking policy in Colorado, Wyoming, and Louisiana. Environmental Practice 16 (2):102–112. doi:10.1017/S1466046614000027.
  • Cook, T. E., and P. Gronke. 2005. The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics 67 (3):784–803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x.
  • Crowe, J., T. Silva, R. G. Ceresola, A. Buday, and C. Leonard. 2015. Differences in public perceptions and leaders’ perceptions on hydraulic fracturing and shale development. Sociological Perspectives 58 (3):441–463. doi:10.1177/0731121414567355.
  • Davern, M. 2013. Nonresponse rates are a problematic indicator of nonresponse bias in survey research. Health Services Research 48 (3):905–912. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12070.
  • Davis, C. 2014. Substate federalism and fracking policies: Does state regulatory authority trump local land use autonomy? Environmental Science & Technology 48 (15):8397–8403. doi:10.1021/es405095y.
  • Davis, C., and J. M. Fisk. 2014. Energy abundance or environmental worries? Analyzing public support for fracking in the United States. Review of Policy Research 31 (1):1–16. doi:10.1111/ropr.12048.
  • Devine-Wright, P. 2005. Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 8 (2):125–139. doi:10.1002/we.124.
  • Devine-Wright, P. 2009. Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19 (6):426–441. doi:10.1002/casp.1004.
  • Dunlap, R. E., and A. M. McCright. 2008. A widening gap: Republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 50 (5):26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35.
  • Evensen, D., J. B. Jacquet, C. E. Clarke, and R. C. Stedman. 2014. What's the ‘fracking’ problem? One word can’t say it all. The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2):130–136. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2014.06.004.
  • Farrell, J. 2016a. Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (1):92–97. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509433112.
  • Farrell, J. 2016b. Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement. Nature Climate Change 6 (4):370–374. doi:10.1038/nclimate2875.
  • Ferrar, K. J., D. R. Michanowicz, C. Christen, N. Mulcahy, S. L. Malone, and R. Sharma. 2013. Assessment of effluent contaminants from three facilities discharging marcellus shale wastewater to surface waters in Pennsylvania. Environmental Science & Technology 47 (7):3472–3481. doi:10.1021/es301411q.
  • Finucane, M. L., P. Slovic, C. K. Mertz, J. Flynn, and T. A. Satterfield. 2000. Gender, race, and perceived risk: The ‘white male' effect. Health, Risk & Society 2 (2):159–172. doi:10.1080/713670162.
  • Fisk, J. M. 2013. The right to know? State politics of fracking disclosure. Review of Policy Research 30 (4):345–365. doi:10.1111/ropr.12025.
  • Flynn, J., P. Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 1994. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis 14 (6):1101–1108. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x.
  • Freeden, M. 2006. Ideology and political theory. Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (1):3–22. doi:10.1080/13569310500395834.
  • Gauchat, G. 2012. Politicization of science in the public sphere a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review 77 (2):167–187. doi:10.1177/0003122412438225.
  • Giddens, A. 2013. The consequences of modernity. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  • Groves, R. M. 2006. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (5):646–675. doi:10.1093/poq/nfl033.
  • Groves, R. M., and E. Peytchev. 2008. The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias a Meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2):167–189. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn011.
  • Hamilton, L. C., J. Hartter, and K. Saito. 2015. Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open 5 (3):215824401560275. doi:10.1177/2158244015602752.
  • Harring, N. 2013. Understanding the effects of corruption and political trust on willingness to make economic sacrifices for environmental protection in a cross-national perspective. Social Science Quarterly 94 (3):660–671. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00904.x.
  • Harring, N. 2014. Corruption, inequalities and the perceived effectiveness of economic pro-environmental policy instruments: A European cross-national study. Environmental Science & Policy 39:119–128. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.011.
  • Hempel, L. M., K. MacIlroy, and E. K. Smith. 2014. Framing the environment: The Cornwall Alliance, Laissez-faire Environmentalism, and the Green Dragon. http://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/10324/19755/1/JSTR-2014-1-FrammingEnvironment.pdf (accessed December 14, 2017).
  • Hill, E. 2014. Three essays on the impacts of unconventional drilling on early life health. http://www.ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/38804 (accessed November 21, 2015).
  • Hogg, M. A. 2007. Uncertainty–identity theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 39:69–126. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8.
  • Hornsey, M. J. 2008. Social identity theory and self‐categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (1):204–222. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x.
  • Holzman, D. C. 2011. Methane found in well water near fracking sites. Environmental Health Perspectives 119 (7):a289. doi:10.1289/ehp.119-a289.
  • Howarth, R. W., R. Santoro, and A. Ingraffea. 2011. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change 106 (4):679–690. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5.
  • Hudgins, A., and A. Poole. 2014. Framing fracking: Private property, common resources, and regimes of governance. Journal of Political Ecology 21 (1):303–348. doi:10.2458/v21i1.21138.
  • Huxster, J. K., X. Uribe-Zarain, and W. Kempton. 2015. Undergraduate understanding of climate change: The influences of college major and environmental group membership on survey knowledge scores. The Journal of Environmental Education 46 (3):149–165. doi:10.1080/00958964.2015.1021661.
  • Israel, A. L., G. Wong-Parodi, T. Webler, and P. C. Stern. 2015. Eliciting public concerns about an emerging energy technology: The case of unconventional shale gas development in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 8:139–150. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.002.
  • Jacquet, J. B. 2012. Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in Northern Pennsylvania. Energy Policy 50:677–688. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.011.
  • Jacquet, J. B., and R. C. Stedman. 2013. Perceived impacts from wind farm and natural gas development in Northern Pennsylvania. Rural Sociology 78 (4):450–472. doi:10.1111/ruso.12022.
  • Jacques, P. J., R. E. Dunlap, and M. Freeman. 2008. The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics 17 (3):349–385. doi:10.1080/09644010802055576.
  • Jaeger, C. C., T. Webler, E. A. Rosa, and O. Renn. 2013. Risk, uncertainty and rational action. New York: Routledge.
  • Jalbert, K., A. J. Kinchy, and S. L. Perry. 2014. Civil society research and Marcellus Shale natural gas development: Results of a survey of volunteer water monitoring organizations. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4 (1):78–86. doi:10.1007/s13412-013-0155-7.
  • Jennings, M. K., L. Stoker, and J. Bowers. 2009. Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics 71 (3):782–799. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090719.
  • Jennings, M. K., and R. G. Niemi. 1968. The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review 62 (1):169–184. doi:10.1017/S0003055400115709.
  • Jost, J. T., J. Glaser, A. W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway. 2003. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129 (3):339. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.
  • Kahan, D. M., D. Braman, J. Gastil, P. Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 2007. Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3):465–505. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x.
  • Kahan, D. M., D. Braman, P. Slovic, J. Gastil and G. Cohen. 2009. Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2):87–90.
  • Kam, C. D. 2005. Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior 27 (2):163–182. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-1764-y.
  • Karlson, K. B., and A. Holm. 2011. Decomposing primary and secondary effects: A new decomposition method. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 29 (2):221–237. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2010.12.005.
  • Keeter, S., C. Kennedy, M. Dimock, J. Best, and P. Craighill. 2006. Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (5):759–779. doi:10.1093/poq/nfl035.
  • Kellstedt, P. M., S. Zahran, and A. Vedlitz. 2008. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis 28 (1):113–126. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x.
  • Kitt, A. S., and D. B. Gleicher. 1950. Determinants of voting behavior: a progress report. Public Opinion Quarterly 14 (3):393–412. doi:10.1086/266209.
  • Kizewski, A. L. 2015. “It’s my soul’s responsibility”: Understanding activists’ gendered experiences in anti-fracking grassroots organizations in Northern Colorado. Retrieved December 14, 2017 from https://search.proquest.com/openview/4079c35239bd987b353e7c44e60b694e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
  • Kohler, U., K. B. Karlson, and A. Holm. 2011. Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. Stata Journal 11 (3):420–438.
  • Konisky, D. M., J. Milyo, and L. E. Richardson. 2008. Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly 89 (5):1066–1085. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00574.x.
  • Kriesky, J., B. D. Goldstein, K. Zell, and S. Beach. 2013. Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity. Energy Policy 58:228–236. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.005.
  • Ladd, A. E. 2013. Stakeholder perceptions of socioenvironmental impacts from unconventional natural gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the Haynesville shale. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 28 (2):56–89.
  • Ladd, A. E. 2014. Environmental disputes and opportunity-threat impacts surrounding natural gas fracking in Louisiana. Social Currents 1 (3):293–311. doi:10.1177/2329496514540132.
  • Layman, G. C., and T. M. Carsey. 2002. Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4):786–802. doi:10.2307/3088434.
  • Lee, J. 2015. The regional economic impact of oil and gas extraction in Texas. Energy Policy 87:60–71. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.032.
  • Leiserowitz, A. A. 2005. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 25 (6):1433–1442. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x.
  • Lewkowicz, M. A. 2006. The effectiveness of elite cues as heuristics in proposition elections. American Politics Research 34 (1):51–68. doi:10.1177/1532673X05276510.
  • Lubell, M., A. Vedlitz, S. Zahran, and L. T. Alston. 2006. Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy. Political Research Quarterly 59 (1):149–160. doi:10.1177/106591290605900113.
  • Malin, S. A. 2015. The price of nuclear power: Uranium communities and environmental justice. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Malka, A., and Y. Lelkes. 2010. More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research 23 (2–3):156–88. doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3.
  • Mayer, A. 2016. Risk and benefits in a fracking boom: Evidence from Colorado. The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (3):744–753. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.04.006.
  • Mayer, A. 2017. Risk, place and oil and gas policy preferences among Coloradoans (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University). https://dspace.library.colostate.edu/bitstream/handle/10217/181374/Mayer_colostate_0053A_14101.pdf?sequence =1 (accessed March 28, 2018).
  • Mayer, A. 2018. Community economic identity and colliding treadmills in oil and gas governance. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 8 (1):1–12. doi:10.1007/s13412-017-0435-8.
  • Mayer, A., and E. K. Smith. 2017. Education, political affiliation and energy policy in the United States: A case of Tea Party exceptionalism? Energy Research & Social Science 23:74–81. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.002.
  • McAdam, D., and H. Boudet. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000–2005. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • McClosky, H., and J. Zaller. 1984. The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McCright, A. M., K. Dentzman, M. Charters, and T. Dietz. 2013. The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters 8 (4):044029. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2003. Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems 50 (3):348–373. doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011a. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change 21 (4):1163–1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011b. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2):155–94. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
  • Minor, J. 2014. Local government fracking regulation: A Colorado case study. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id =2485889 (accessed December 10, 2015).
  • Mobley, C., and W. Kilbourne. 2013. Gender differences in pro-environmental intentions: A cross-national perspective on the influence of self-enhancement values and views on technology. Sociological Inquiry 83 (2):310–332. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00431.x.
  • Mohai, P. 1992. Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources 5 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/08941929209380772.
  • Munasib, A., and D. S. Rickman. 2015. Regional economic impacts of the shale gas and tight oil boom: A synthetic control analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 50:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.10.006.
  • Mullins, W. A. 1972. On the concept of ideology in political science. American Political Science Review 66 (2):498–510. doi:10.2307/1957794.
  • Newell, R. G., and D. Raimi. 2018. US state and local oil and gas revenue sources and uses. Energy Policy 112:12–18. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.002.
  • Nolon, J. R., and S. E. Gavin. 2013. Hydrofracking: State preemption, local power, and cooperative governance. Case Western Reserve Law Review 63 (4):995–1458.
  • O'Connor, R. E., R. J. Bard, and A. Fisher. 1999. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis 19 (3):461–471.
  • Opsal, T., and T. O. C. Shelley. 2014. Energy crime, harm, and problematic state response in Colorado: A case of the fox guarding the hen house? Critical Criminology 22 (4):561–577. doi:10.1007/s10612-014-9255-2.
  • Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2011. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  • Paredes, D., T. Komarek, and S. Loveridge. 2015. Income and employment effects of shale gas extraction windfalls: Evidence from the Marcellus region. Energy Economics 47:112–120. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.025.
  • Paulik, L. B., C. E. Donald, B. W. Smith, L. G. Tidwell, K. A. Hobbie, L. Kincl, E. N. Haynes, and K. A. Anderson. 2015. Impact of natural gas extraction on PAH levels in ambient air. Environmental Science & Technology 49 (8):5203–5210. doi:10.1021/es506095e.
  • Peeples, J., P. Bsumek, S. Schwarze, and J. Schneider. 2014. Industrial apocalyptic: Neoliberalism, coal, and the burlesque frame. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 17 (2):227–253. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.17.2.0227.
  • Perry, S. L. 2012. Development, land use, and collective trauma: The marcellus shale gas boom in rural Pennsylvania. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 34 (1):81–92. doi:10.1111/j.2153-9561.2012.01066.x.
  • Peters, E., and P. Slovic. 1996. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26 (16):1427–1453. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x.
  • Pew Research Center. 2014. November 2014 Post-Election Survey, 2014 [Data file and code book]. http://www.people-press.org/category/datasets/2014/.
  • Rabe, B. G., and R. L. Hampton. 2015. Taxing fracking: The politics of state severance taxes in the shale era. Review of Policy Research 32 (4):389–412. doi:10.1111/ropr.12127.
  • Rabinowitz, P. M. 2015. Proximity to natural gas wells and reported health status: Results of a household survey in Washington county, Pennsylvania. Environmental Health Perspectives 123 (1):21–26. doi:10.1289/ehp.1307732.
  • Rajeev Gowda, M. V., J. C. Fox, and R. D. Magelky. 1997. Students’ understanding of climate change: Insights for scientists and educators. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78 (10):2232–2240. doi:10.1175/1520-0477-78.10.2232.
  • Rothstein, B. 2005. Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sapiro, V. 2004. Not your parent’s political socialization: Introduction for a new generation. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1):1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104840.
  • Schafft, K. A., Y. Borlu, and L. Glenna. 2013. The relationship between marcellus shale gas development in Pennsylvania and local perceptions of risk and opportunity. Rural Sociology 78 (2):143–66. doi:10.1111/ruso.12004.
  • Sears, D. O. 1975. Political socialization. In Handbook of political science, eds. F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby, 93–153. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Sears, D. O., and S. Levy. 2003. Childhood and adult political development. http://psycnetapa.org/psycinfo/2003-88243-003 (accessed May 13, 2016).
  • Siegrist, M. 2000. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 20 (2):195–204. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202020.
  • Siegrist, M., G. Cvetkovich, and C. Roth. 2000. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 20 (3):353–62. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034.
  • Silva, T. J., and J. A. Crowe. 2015. The hope-reality gap: Rural community officials’ perceptions of unconventional shale development as a means to increase local population and revitalize resource extraction. Community Development 46 (4):312–28. doi:10.1080/15575330.2015.1061678.
  • Simonelli, J. 2014. Home rule and natural gas development in New York: Civil fracking rights. Journal of Political Ecology 21 (1):258–78. doi:10.2458/v21i1.21136.
  • Sniderman, P. M., R. A. Brody, and P. E. Tetlock. 1993. Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sterman, J. D., and L. B. Sweeney. 2007. Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change 80 (3–4):213–238. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9107-5.
  • Stillman, J. G., G. M. Guthrie, and S. W. Becker. 1960. Determinants of political party preference. The Journal of Social Psychology 51 (1):165–171. doi:10.1080/00224545.1960.9922025.
  • Stoutenborough, J., S. E. Robinson, and A. Vedlitz. 2016. Is “fracking” a new dirty word? The influence of word choice on public views toward natural gas attitudes. Energy Research and Social Science 17:52–58. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.005.
  • Stoutenborough, J. W., A. Vedlitz, and X. Liu. 2015. The influence of specific risk perceptions on public policy support an examination of energy policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1):102–120. doi:10.1177/0002716214556472.
  • Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: a sociological theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 2004. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology: Key readings, eds. J. Jost and J. Sidanius, 276–293. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Tedin, K. L. 1974. The influence of parents on the political attitudes of adolescents. American Political Science Review 68 (4):1579–1592. doi:10.2307/1959943.
  • Theodori, G. L. 2009. Paradoxical perceptions of problems associated with unconventional natural gas development. Southern Rural Sociology 24 (3):97–117.
  • Unsworth, K. L., and K. S. Fielding. 2014. It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change 27:131–137. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002.
  • US Census. 2015. Colorado population data. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/CO/AGE295216#viewtop (accessed March 15, 2015).
  • USDA ERS. 2016. County oil and gas production. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/county-level-oil-and-gas-production-in-the-us/ (accessed December 17, 2016).
  • Uslaner, E. M. 2002. The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vainio, A., and R. Paloniemi. 2013. Does belief matter in climate change action? Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 22 (4):382–395. doi:10.1177/0963662511410268.
  • Visschers, V. H. M., and M. Siegrist. 2013. How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: Results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Analysis 33 (2):333–347. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x.
  • Warner, B., and J. Shapiro. 2013. Fractured, fragmented federalism: A study in fracking regulatory policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43 (3):474–496. doi:10.1093/publius/pjt014.
  • Weber, J. G. 2014. A decade of natural gas development: The makings of a resource curse? Resource and Energy Economics 37:168–183. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.013.
  • Whitfield, S. C., E. A. Rosa, A. Dan, and T. Dietz. 2009. The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 29 (3):425–437. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x.
  • Wildavsky, A., and K. Dake. 1990. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus 119 (4):41–60.
  • Wines, M. 2016. Colorado court strikes down local bans on fracking, New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/03/us/colorado-court-strikes-down-local-bans-on-fracking.html (accessed December 15, 2017).
  • Wright, S. 2012. An unconventional bonanza. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21558432-new-sources-gas-could-transform-worlds-energy-markets-says-simon-wrightbut-it-wont (accessed December 15, 2017).
  • Xiao, C., and A. M. McCright. 2012. Explaining gender differences in concern about environmental problems in the United States. Society and Natural Resources 25 (11):1067–1084. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.651191.
  • Yeo, S. K., M. A. Cacciatore, D. Brossard, D. A. Scheufele, K. Runge, L. Y. Su, J. Kim, M. Xenos, and E. A. Corley. 2014. Partisan amplification of risk: American perceptions of nuclear energy risk in the wake of the Fukushima daiichi disaster. Energy Policy 67:727–736. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.061.
  • Yergin, D. 2011. The prize: the epic quest for oil, money & power. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Zannakis, M., A. Wallin, and L. O. Johansson. 2015. Political trust and perceptions of the quality of institutional arrangements–how do they influence the public's acceptance of environmental rules. Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (6):424–438. doi:10.1002/eet.1676.
  • Zirogiannis, N., J. Alcorn, J. Rupp, S. Carley, and J. D. Graham. 2016. State regulation of unconventional gas development in the US: An empirical evaluation. Energy Research and Social Science 11:142–154. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.09.009.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.