Why Government, Interest Groups, and Research Coordinate: The Different Purposes of Forums

References

• Agranoff, R. 2006. Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review 66 (s1):56–65. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and T. Entwistle. 2010. Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (3):679–701. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mup045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):543–571. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, L. E., M. Green, Rosemary L., and I. Walker. 2013. The influence of forums and multilevel governance on the climate adaptation practices of Australian organizations. Ecology and Society 18 (4). DOI:10.5751/ES-06120-180462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., and R. Steurer. 2014. Innovation in climate adaptation policy: Are regional partnerships catalysts or talking shops? Environmental Politics 23 (5):818–838. DOI:10.1080/09644016.2014.924196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R. 2009. Generalized trust in multi-organizational policy arenas: Studying its emergence from a network perspective. Political Research Quarterly 62 (1):178–189. DOI:10.1177/1065912907312982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., T. Olivier, and A. Lavers. 2015. Focusing events and changes in ecologies of policy games: Evidence from the Paraná River Delta. Review of Policy Research 32 (4):443–464. DOI:10.1111/ropr.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., and C. Wilcox. 2015. Interest group society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bidwell, R. D., and C. M. Ryan. 2006. Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 19 (9):827–843. DOI:10.1080/08941920600835585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., M. B. Crosby, C., and M. Middleton Stone. 2006. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review 20 (s1):45–55. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., K. Oliver, and A. Wellstead. 2016. To bridge the divide between evidence and policy: Reduce ambiguity as much as uncertainty. Public Administration Review 76 (3):399–402. DOI:10.1111/puar.12555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A., and R. Wilkinson. 2005. Beyond participation: Boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact. Society & Natural Resources 18 (3):255–265. DOI:10.1080/08941920590908123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., J. Laporte, and J. Seawright. 2012. Putting typologies to work: Concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor. Political Research Quarterly 65 (1):217–232. DOI:10.1177/1065912912437162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crona, B. I., and J. N. Parker. 2011. Network determinants of knowledge utilization: Preliminary lessons from a boundary organization. Science Communication 33 (4):448–471. DOI:10.1177/1075547011408116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crona, B. I., and J. N. Parker. 2012. Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society 17 (1). DOI:10.5751/ES-04534-170132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvitanovic, C., A. J. Hobday, L. Van Kerkhoff, S. K. Wilson, K. Dobbs, and N. A. Marshall. 2015. Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources: A review of knowledge and research needs. Ocean & Coastal Management 112:25–35. DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Kope, L., and K. Miller-Stevens. 2015. Rethinking a typology of watershed partnerships: A governance perspective. Public Works Management & Policy 20 (1):29–48. DOI:10.1177/1087724X14524733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and D. De Bièvre. 2007. The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy 27 (01):1–12. DOI:10.1017/S0143814X07000591
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., A. Van Buuren, and N. Van Schie. 2011. Co-producing knowledge: Joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science & Policy 14 (6):675–684. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative governance regimes. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1):1–29. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., and J. Scholz. 2010. Self-organizing federalism. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., and A. M. Khademian. 2007. The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance 20 (2):305–324. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., M. Angst, and S. Maag. 2017. Co-participation in Swiss water policy forums. International Journal of Water Resources Development Online 1. DOI:10.1080/07900627.2017.1374929
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., and P. Leifeld. 2015. Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for? Policy Sciences 48 (3):363–382. DOI:10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., and I. Schläpfer. 2017. Metagovernance and policy forum outputs in Swiss environmental politics. Environmental Politics 26 (5):870–892. DOI:10.1080/09644016.2017.1284981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giebels, D., A. Van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos. 2015. Using knowledge in a complex decision-making process – Evidence and principles from the Danish Houting project's ecosystem-based management approach. Environmental Science & Policy 47:53–67. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasbergen, P. 2011. Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: The ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool. Environmental Policy and Governance 21 (1):1–13. DOI:10.1002/eet.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, P., and N. Hertting. 2017. Understanding participatory governance: An analysis of participants’ motives for participation. The American Review of Public Administration 37 (5):538–549. DOI:10.1177/0275074015626298
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values 26 (4):399–408. DOI:10.1177/016224390102600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., P. Olsson, C. Folke, and K. Johansson. 2006. Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology 34 (4):573–592. DOI:10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., and J. Pinkse. 2014. Private environmental governance through cross-sector partnerships: Tensions between competition and effectiveness. Organization & Environment 27 (2):140–160. DOI:10.1177/1086026614530996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. D. 2010. Governments, group membership, and watershed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 23 (7):587–603. DOI:10.1080/08941920802534572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojnacki, M., D. C. Kimball, F. R. Baumgartner, J. M. Berry, and B. L. Leech. 2012. Studying organizational advocacy and influence: Reexamining interest group research. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1):379. DOI:10.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoke, T. T. 2003. Choosing battlegrounds: Interest group lobbying across multiple venues. Political Research Quarterly 56 (3):325–336. DOI:10.1177/106591290305600307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., S. Vangen, C. Huxham, and C. Eden. 2000. The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 2 (3):337–358. DOI:10.1080/14719030000000021
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society 37 (3):281–320. DOI:10.1177/0095399705276111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., and F. Varone. 2012. Treating policy brokers seriously: Evidence from the climate policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2):319–346. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mur035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., D. Nohrstedt, C. M. Weible, and P. A. Sabatier. 2014. The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Theories of the policy process, ed. C. M. Weible and P. A. Sabatier, 183–224. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, A. C. 2009. Science in environmental policy: The politics of objective advice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinzig, A., and D. Starrett. 2003. Coping with uncertainty: A call for a new science-policy forum. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 32 (5):330–335. DOI:10.1579/0044-7447-32.5.330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., and C. Skelcher. 2007. Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration 85 (3):587–608. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., and E. M. Johnson. 2004. One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences 37 (2):185–204. DOI:10.1023/B:OLIC.0000048532.94150.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T., M. T. Steelman, A. J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. W. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., and C. W. Thomas. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66 (s1):111–121. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, A. A., and L. D. Jenkins. 2015. The role of bridging organizations in environmental management: Examining social networks in working groups. Ecology and Society 20 (2):82. DOI:10.5751/ES-07541-200216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krick, E. 2015. Negotiated expertise in policy-making: How governments use hybrid advisory committees. Science and Public Policy 42 (4):487–500. DOI:10.1093/scipol/scu069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, M. 1969. Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review 29 (4):346–358. DOI:10.2307/973247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., N. W. Pelkey, and P. A. Sabatier. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (4):645–670. DOI:10.1002/pam.10079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., C. M. Weible, S. R. Vince, S. N. Siddiki, and J. C. Calanni. 2014. Fostering learning through collaboration: Knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (3):591–622. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mut011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. 2004. Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23 (3):549–573. DOI:10.1002/pam.20026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. 2013. Governing institutional complexity: the ecology of games framework. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3):537–559. DOI:10.1111/psj.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., A. D. Henry, and M. McCoy. 2010. Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):287–300. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):148–163. DOI:10.2307/3088419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, M., and T. Steelman. 2003. Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations the importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review 5 (2):197–224. DOI:10.1080/1461667032000066417
   Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management 41 (4):487–500. DOI:10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, E. A., and T. M. Koontz. 2003. Research note a typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 16 (5):451–460. DOI:10.1080/08941920309182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 2001. Do networks really work? Public Administration Review 61 (4):414–423. DOI:10.1111/0033-3352.00045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, K. S., and M. S. Feldman. 2014. Boundaries as junctures: Collaborative boundary work for building efficient resilience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (3):673–695. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mut085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21 (2–3):129–168. DOI:10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciarini, P., M. Fischer, and D. Traber. 2015. Political decision-making in Switzerland. The consensus model under pressure. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Selsky, J. W., and B. Parker. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management 31 (6):849–873. DOI:10.1177/014920630527960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selsky, J. W., and B. Parker. 2010. Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: Prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. Journal of Business Ethics 94 (S1):21–37. DOI:10.1007/s10551-011-0776-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., and S. Goel. 2017. Assessing collaborative policymaking outcomes: An analysis of U.S. Marine aquaculture partnerships. The American Review of Public Administration 47 (2):253–271. DOI:10.1177/0275074015599603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2011. Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society 43 (8):842–868. DOI:10.1177/0095399711418768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review 66 (s1):20–32. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., J. Edelenbos, and E.-H. Klijn. 2015. Connective management and governance network performance: The mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in The Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (4):746–764. DOI:10.1068/c1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasseur, L., L. Lafrance, C. Ansseau, De Renaud, D. Morin, and T. Audet. 1997. Advisory committee: A powerful tool for helping decision makers in environmental issues. Environmental Management 21 (3):359–365. DOI:10.1007/s002679900035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., D. Lach, and B. S. Steel, eds. 2017. New strategies for wicked problems: Science and solutions in the 21st century. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar