Futures Research Methods and Applications in Natural Resources

References

• Alcamo, J., ed. 2008. Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J. A., and C. G. Kenny. 2011. Leading in uncertain times. Innovation 9(April/May (2)).
   Google Scholar
• Bell, W. 1997. Foundations of futures studies, volume 1: History, purposes, and knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N. 2013. Horizon scanning for environmental foresight: A review of issues and approaches. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-121. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. URL: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/44822
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N. 2015. The futures wheel: A method for exploring the implications of social-ecological change. Society & Natural Resources 29(3):374–9. URL: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/50218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., M. J. Dockry, and S. R. Shifley. 2018. Anticipating cascading change in land use: Exploring the implications of a major trend in US Northern forests. Land Use Policy 71 :222–9. URL: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/55563 doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., G. H. Kubik, and P. C. Bishop. 2012. Strengthening environmental foresight: Potential contributions of futures research. Ecology and Society 17(2):10. URL: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/40689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezold, C. 2009. Aspirational futures. Journal of Futures Research 13(4):81–90. URL: http://www.jfs.tku.edu.tw/13-4/AE06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Birtchnell, T., and J. Urry. 2013. 3D, SF and the future. Futures 50 :25–34. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., A. Hines, and T. Collins. 2007. The current state of scenario development: An overview of techniques. Foresight 9(1):5–25. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636680710727516 doi:10.1108/14636680710727516
   Google Scholar
• Bookman, C. S. 2000. Town meeting on America’s coastal future: Using the internet to promote coastal stewardship. Ocean & Coastal Management 43 :937–51. doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00065-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candy, S. 2018. Gaming futures literacy: The thing from the future. In Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century. ed. R. Miller, 233–246. New York, NY: UNESCO and Routledge. URL: https://www.routledge.com/Transforming-the-Future-Open-Access-Anticipation-in-the-21st-Century/Miller/p/book/9781138485877
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. R. 2002. Ecological futures: Building an ecology of the long now. Ecology 83(8):2069–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. R., P. L. Pingali, E. M. Bennett, and M. B. Zurek, eds. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Volume 2 scenarios – findings of the scenarios working group (Millennium ecosystem assessment series). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, C. N., S. Inayatullah, M. A. Burgman, W. J. Sutherland, and B. A. Wintle. 2014. Strategic foresight: How planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29(9):531–41. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, E. 2004. Futuring: The exploration of the future. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R. 2000. Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conservation Ecology 4(1):5. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art5
   Google Scholar
• Dator, J. 2017. Why gaming? Why alternative futures? Journal of Futures Studies 22(2):75–80. http://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/06WhyGamingWhyAlternative.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, J. 2006. How emergence arises. Ecological Complexity 3(4):293–301. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorward, L. J., J. C. Mittermeier, C. Sandbrook, and F. Spooner. 2017. Pokémon go: Benefits, costs, and lessons for the conservation movement. Conservation Letters 10(1):160–5. doi:10.1111/conl.12326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, C. 1979. Science fiction versus futurology: Dramatic versus rational models. Science Fiction Studies 6(1):20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, K., W. De Jong, P. Cronkleton, and T. H. Nghi. 2010. Participatory methods for planning the future in Forest communities. Society and Natural Resources 23(7):604–19. doi:10.1080/08941920802713572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2017. Gaming conservation: Nature 2.0 confronts nature-deficit disorder. Geoforum 79 :153–62. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, J. C., and T. J. Gordon, eds. 2009. Futures research methodology—Version 3.0 (CD-ROM). Washington, DC: The Millennium Project. [online] URL: http://www.millennium-project.org/millennium/FRM-V3.html#toc
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, J. C., and The Futures Group International. 2009. Scenarios. In Futures research methodology—Version 3.0 (CD-ROM). eds. J. C. Glenn and T. J. Gordon. Washington, DC: The Millennium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Godet, M. 2012. To predict or to build the future? Reflections on the field and differences between foresight and la prospective. The Futurist 46(3):46–9. http://en.laprospective.fr/dyn/anglais/articles/to-predict-or-to-build-the-future.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T. J., and J. C. Glenn. 2009. Environmental scanning. In Futures research methodology—Version 3.0 [CD-ROM]. eds. J. C. Glenn and T. J. Gordon. Washington, DC: The Millennium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, G., A. Greenhill, and V. Callaghan. 2013. Exploring business visions using creative fictional prototypes. Futures 50 :1–4. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, G., A. Greenhill, and V. Callagham. 2014. Technological forecasting and social change special section: Creative prototyping. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 84 :1–4. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L., and P. Longstaff. 2010. Managing surprises in complex systems: Multidisciplinary perspectives on resilience. (Special feature). Ecology and Society 14(1):49. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art49/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, A. 2003. Applying integral futures to environmental scanning. Futures Research Quarterly 19(4):49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, A., D. N. Bengston , and M. J. Dockry , eds. 2018. The forest futures horizon scanning project. Gen. Tech. Rpt. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Hines, A., and P. Bishop, eds. 2006. Thinking about the future: Guidelines for strategic foresight. Washington, DC: Social Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, A., and P. C. Bishop. 2013. Framework foresight: Exploring futures the Houston way. Futures 51 :31–49. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogstra-Klein, M. A., G. M. Hengeveld, and R. de Jong. 2017. Analysing scenario approaches for forest management – one decade of experiences in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 85(2):222–34. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. eds. S. Solomon , D. Qin , M. Manning , Z. Chen , M. Marquis , K. B. Averyt , M. Tignor , and H. L. Miller . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. URL: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D. 2011. Science fiction prototyping: Designing the future with science fiction. San Francisco, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jungk, R., and N. Mullert. 1987. Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. London, UK: Institute for Social Inventions.
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, F., DiMaio, F. Foldit Contenders Group, Foldit Void Crushers Group, S. Cooper, M. Kazmierczyk, M. Gilski, S. Krzywda, H. Zabranska, I. Pichova, J. Thompson, Z. Popović, M. Jaskolski, et al. 2011. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18 :1175–7. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippitt, L. L. 1998. Preferred futuring: Envision the future you want and unleash the energy to get there. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, T. 2006. Contemporary futurist thought. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.
   Google Scholar
• Lum, R. A. K. 2016. 4 Steps to the future: a quick and clean guide to creating foresight. Honolulu, HI: FutureScribe.
   Google Scholar
• Markley, O. 2015. Introduction to the symposium on ‘intuition in futures work. Journal of Futures Studies 20(1):83–90. URL: http://www.jfs.tku.edu.tw/?page_id=5520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrie, A., P. Keys, M. Metian, and H. Österblom. 2018. Radical ocean futures-scenario development using science fiction prototyping. Futures 95 :22–32. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, I. 1993. Stranger than fiction: How important is science fiction for futures studies?Futures 25(3):315–21. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90139-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milojević, I. 2017. Introduction by the special editor to the symposium on gaming futures. Journal of Futures Studies 22 (2):1–4. http://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/00Introduction.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., C. Wyborn, L. Yung, D. R. Williams, C. Cleveland, L. Eby, S. Dobrowski, and E. Towler. 2016. Engaging communities and climate change futures with multi-scale, iterative scenario building (MISB) in the Western United States. Human Organization 75 (1):33–46. doi:10.17730/0018-7259-75.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R. L., D. N. Bengston , L. A. DeVaney , and T.A.C. Thompson . 2015. Wildland fire management futures: Insights from a foresight panel. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-152. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. URL: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/48581
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. 2007. The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pilkey, O. H., and L. Pilkey-Jarvis. 2007. Useless arithmetic: Why environmental scientists can’t predict the future. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polak, F. 1973. The image of the future. (Translated and abridged by Elise Boulding). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, R. 2008. Foresight methodology. In The handbook of technology foresight: Concepts and practices. eds. L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, and R. Popper, 44–88. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rejeski, D., and R. L. Olson. 2006. Has futurism failed? The Wilson Quarterly 30: 14–21. URL: http://archive.wilsonquarterly.com/sites/default/files/articles/WQ_VOL30_W_2006_Article_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rhisiart, M. 2013. Exploring the future for arts and culture organizations through scenarios and vignettes. Futures 50: 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. P., and A. Middleton. 2014. Evolving products: From human design to self-organisation via science fiction prototyping. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 84: 15–28. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, C., A. Carlsson-Kanyama , K. B. Lindahl , K. M. Sonnek , A. Mossing , A. Nordin , E. M. Nordström , and R. Räty . 2016. Understanding consistencies and gaps between desired forest futures: An analysis of visions from stakeholder groups in Sweden. Ambio 45 (S2):100–S108. (Suppl.) doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0746-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandbrook, C., W. M. Adams, and B. Monteferri. 2015. Digital games and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Letters 8 (2):118–24. doi:10.1111/conl.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D., R. A. Pielke, Jr., and R. Byerly, Jr., eds. 2000. Prediction: Science, decision making, and the future of nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schüll, E., and M. A. Hoogstra-Klein. 2017. Introduction to the special issue on “scenario analysis for forest policy and forest management – New insights and experiences. Forest Policy and Economics 85: 217–21. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. 1996. The art of the long view: Planning for the future in an uncertain world. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, R. A. 1999. A new framework for environmental scanning. Foresight 1 (5):441–51. doi:10.1108/14636689910802331
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W. J., and H. J. Woodroof. 2009. The need for environmental horizon scanning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (10):523–7. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W. J., Butchart, S. H. M. Connor B., C. Culshaw , L. V. Dicks , J. Dinsdale , H. Doran , A. C. Entwistle , E. Fleishman , D. W. Gibbons , Z. Jiang , et al. 2018. A 2018 horizon scan of emerging issues for global conservation and biological diversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33 (1):47–58. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffler, A. 1970. Future shock. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• United States Marine Corps (USMC). 2016. Science fiction futures: Marine Corps security environment forecast: Futures 2030-2045. Quantico, VA: Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory/Futures Directorate, Futures Assessment Division. URL: http://www.mcwl.marines.mil/Portals/34/Documents/FuturesAssessment/Marine%20Corps%20Science%20Fiction%20Futures%202016_12_9.pdf?ver=2016-12-09-105855-733
   Google Scholar
• USDA Forest Service. 2016. Future of America's forests and rangelands: Update to the 2010 Resources Planning Act assessment. Gen. Tech. Report WO-GTR-94. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service. URL: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/53212
   Google Scholar
• Wells, H. G. 1987 [1932]. Wanted—professors of foresight! Futures Research Quarterly 3 (1):89–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H.-Y. 2013. Imagination workshops: An empirical exploration of SFP for technology-based business innovation. Futures 50: 44–55. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar