Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

References

• Agrawal, A., and S.Goyal. 2001. Group size and collective action: Third-party monitoring in common-pool resources. Comparative Political Studies 34 (1):63–93. doi:10.1177/0010414001034001003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. 2011. Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., and R. Plummer, eds. 2010. Adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., J. Khan, A. Kronsell, and E. Lövbrand, 2010. The promise of new modes of environmental governance. In: Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance, ed. K. Bäckstrand, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. L., J.Lynham, K.Kalberg, and P.Leung. 2016. Social networks and environmental outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (23):6466–6471. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523245113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixler, R. P., S. Johnson, K.Emerson, T. Nabatchi, M. Reuling, C. Curtin, M. Romolini, and J. M. Grove. 2016. Networks and landscapes: A framework for setting goals and evaluating performance at the large landscape scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14 (3):145–153. doi:10.1002/fee.1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, M., P.Will, W. R.Turner, K. A.Wilson, and O.Venter. 2011. Conservation planning with multiple organizations and objectives. Conservation Biology 25 (2):295–304. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01610.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö. 2017. Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357 (6352):eaan1114. doi:10.1126/science.aan1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., A. Mehra, D. J. Brass, and G. Labianca. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323 (5916):892–895. doi:10.1126/science.1165821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, R. D., T. A.Steelman, L.Coe-Juell, C.Cromley, C.Edwards, and D.Tucker, 2005. Adaptive governance: Integrating science, policy, and decision making. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buch-Hansen, H. 2014. Social network analysis and critical realism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (3):306–325. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B. C., H.Gosnell, and B. A.Cosens. 2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society 19 (3):56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermack, T. J. 2004. Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures 36 (3):295–309. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00156-3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. 2012. Development through bricolage: Rethinking institutions for natural resource management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, S., S. A. Moore, M. Lockwood, and M. Mitchell. 2015. Using insights from pragmatism to develop reforms that strengthen institutional competence for conserving biodiversity. Policy Sciences 48 (4):463–489. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9222-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, S., S. A.Moore, M.Lockwood, and T. H.Morrison. 2016a. A diagnostic framework for biodiversity conservation institutions. Pacific Conservation Biology 21 (4):277–290. doi:10.1071/PC15032.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, S., S. A.Moore, and M.Lockwood. 2016b. Letting the managers manage: Analyzing capacity to conserve biodiversity in a cross-border protected area network. Ecology and Society 21 (3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, S., S. A.Moore, M.Lockwood, and M.Mitchell. 2017. Fit-for-purpose institutions? An evaluation of biodiversity conservation in the agricultural landscape of the Tasmanian Midlands, Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 19 (2):133–155. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2016.1162708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. 2001. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. S., D. H. M.Cumming, and C. L.Redman. 2006. Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society 11 (1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvitanovic, C., A. J.Hobday, L.van Kerkhoff, S. K.Wilson, K.Dobbs, and N. A.Marshall. 2015. Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources: A review of knowledge and research needs. Ocean and Coastal Management 112:25–35. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCaro, D. A., C. A.Arnold, E. F.Boamah, and A. S.Garmestani. 2017. Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance. Ecology and Society 22 (1):33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, J. A., and O. R.Young. 2009. Evaluating functional fit between a set of institutions and an ecosystem. Ecology and Society 14 (2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T.Nabatchi. 2015. Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance and Management Review 38 (4):717–747. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. J. 2017. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2):181–194. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., L.Pritchard, Jr, F.Berkes, J.Colding, and U.Svedin. 2007. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society 12 (1):30. www.jstor.org/stable/26267849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J., R.Greaves, H.Noble, and R.Taylor. 2014. Modeling social‐ecological problems in coastal ecosystems: A case study. Complexity 19 (6):73–82. doi:10.1002/cplx.21524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham, H. S., M.Bode, E.McDonald-Madden, E. T.Game, A. T.Knight, and H. P.Possingham. 2010. Effective conservation planning requires learning and adaptation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8 (8):431–437. doi:10.1890/080151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. M., R. R. J.McAllister, J.Corcoran, and K. A.Wilson. 2013. Scale mismatches, conservation planning, and the value of social‐network analyses. Conservation Biology 27 (1):35–44. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01964.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. M., R.McAllister, and K. A.Wilson. 2015. Achieving cross‐scale collaboration for large scale conservation initiatives. Conservation Letters 8 (2):107–117. doi:10.1111/conl.12112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. M., Ö. Bodin, R. R. J. McAllister, and K. A. Wilson. 2015. Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation. Ecology and Society 20 (4):41. doi:10.5751/ES-08035-200441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. 2009. Environment law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law 21 (2):179–212. doi:10.1093/jel/eqp011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J., E.Bergsma, C. J. A. M.Termeer, G. R.Biesbroek, M.van den Brink, P.Jong, J. E. M.Klostermann, S.Meijerink, and S.Nooteboom. 2016. The adaptive capacity of institutions in the spatial planning, water, agriculture and nature sectors in The Netherlands. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 21 (6):883–903. doi:10.1007/s11027-014-9630-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haack, S. 2004. Pragmatism, old and new. Contemporary Pragmatism 1 (1):3–41. doi:10.1163/18758185-90000126.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., E.Mostert, W.Egas, S.Moellenkamp, C.Pahl-Wostl, and R.Yalcin. 2009. Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14 (1):26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration and Society 37 (3):281–320. doi:10.1177/0095399705276111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., and M. Fischer. 2014. Drivers of collaboration to mitigate climate change: An illustration of Swiss climate policy over 15 years. Global Environmental Change 24:88–98. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. J., D.Huitema, M.Hildén, H.van Asselt, T. J.Rayner, J. J.Schoenefeld, J.Tosun, J.Forster, and E. L.Boasson. 2015. Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change 5 (11):977. doi:10.1038/nclimate2725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., and J.Newig. 2014. From planning to implementation: Top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal 42 (3):416–442. doi:10.1111/psj.12067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., J.Davidson, A.Curtis, E.Stratford, and R.Griffith. 2010. Governance principles for natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 23 (10):986–1001. doi:10.1080/08941920802178214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., C. M.Raymond, E.Oczkowski, and M.Morrison. 2015. Measuring the dimensions of adaptive capacity: a psychometric approach. Ecology Society 20 (1):37. doi:10.5751/ES-07203-200137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macura, B., L.Secco, and A. S.Pullin. 2015. What evidence exists on the impact of governance type on the conservation effectiveness of forest protected areas? Knowledge base and evidence gaps. Environmental Evidence 4 (1):24. doi:10.1186/s13750-015-0051-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek, L. I., D.-J. P. Brock, and J. Savla. 2015. Evaluating collaboration for effectiveness: Conceptualization and measurement. American Journal of Evaluation 36 (1):67–85. doi:10.1177/1098214014531068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matous, P., and Y. Todo. 2018. An experiment in strengthening the networks of remote communities in the face of environmental change: leveraging spatially distributed environmental memory. Regional Environmental Change. 18 (6):1741–1752. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1307-9.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, R., C. J.Robinson, K.Maclean, A. M.Guerrero, K.Collins, B. M.Taylor, and P. J.De Barro. 2015. From local to central: A network analysis of who manages plant pest and disease outbreaks across scales. Ecology and Society 20 (1). doi:10.5751/ES-07469-200167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, R., and B. M.Taylor. 2015. Partnerships for sustainability governance: A synthesis of key themes. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12:86–90. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, G. 2000. Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., M. Lockwood, S. A. Moore, and S. Clement. 2015a. Incorporating governance influences into social-ecological system models: a case study involving biodiversity conservation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (11):1903–1922. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.967387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., M. Lockwood, S. A. Moore, and S. Clement. 2015b. Scenario analysis for biodiversity conservation: A social–ecological system approach in the Australian Alps. Journal of environmental management 150:69–80. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., M. Lockwood, S.A. Moore, and S. Clement. 2016a. Building systems-based scenario narratives for novel biodiversity futures in an agricultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 145:45–56. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., M. Lockwood, S. A. Moore, S. Clement, L. Gilfedder, and G. Anderson. 2016b. Using scenario planning to assess governance reforms for enhancing biodiversity outcomes. Land Use Policy 50:559–572. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgans, C. L., A. M.Guerrero, M.Ancrenaz, E.Meijaard, and K. A.Wilson. 2017. Not more, but strategic collaboration needed to conserve Borneo's orangutan. Global Ecology and Conservation 11:236–46. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2017.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H. 2017. Evolving polycentric governance of the Great Barrier Reef. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences doi:10.1073/pnas.1620830114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeson, T. M., M. C.Ferris, M. W.Diebel, P. J.Doran, J. R.O’Hanley, and P. B.McIntyre. 2015. Enhancing ecosystem restoration efficiency through spatial and temporal coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (19):6236–6241. doi:10.1073/pnas.1423812112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldekop, J. A., G.Holmes, W. E.Harris, and K. L.Evans. 2016. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology 30 (1):133–141. doi:10.1111/cobi.12568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review 100 (3):641–672. doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., and M.Cox. 2010. Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation 37 (04):451–463. doi:10.1017/S0376892910000834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., J. Baird, A. Dzyundzyak, D. Armitage, Ö. Bodin, and L. Schultz. 2017. Is adaptive co-management delivering? Examining relationships between collaboration, learning and outcomes in UNESCO biosphere reserves. Ecological Economics 140:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resilience Alliance. 2010. Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners (revised version 2.0). (accessed August 22, 2011). https://www.resalliance.org/resilience-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. H., R. Luton, H. Biggs, R. Biggs, S. Blignaut, A. G. Choles, C. G. Palmer, and P. Tangwe. 2013. Fostering complexity thinking in action research for change in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18 (2):31. doi:10.5751/ES-05330-180231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, F. P. 2014. The promise of common pool resource theory and the reality of commons projects. International Journal of the Commons 8 (2):636–656. doi:10.18352/ijc.477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayles, J. S., and J. A.Baggio. 2017. Who collaborates and why: Assessment and diagnostic of governance network integration for salmon restoration in Puget Sound, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 186:64–78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. 2015. Does collaboration make any difference? Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34 (3):537–566. doi:10.1002/pam.21836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., P.Williams, M./Marchington, and L.Knight. 2013. Collaborative futures: Discursive realignments in austere times. Public Money and Management 33 (2):123–130. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.763424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suškevičs, M., T.Hahn, R.Rodela, B.Macura, and C.Pahl-Wostl. 2018. Learning for social-ecological change: a qualitative review of outcomes across empirical literature in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (7):1085–1112. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1339594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatn, A., and P.Vedeld. 2012. Fit, interplay, and scale: A diagnosis. Ecology and Society 17 (4):12. doi:10.5751/es-05022-170412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virji, H., J.Padgham, and C.Seipt. 2012. Capacity building to support knowledge systems for resilient development-approaches, actions, and needs. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4 (1):115–121. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust, 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F., A. L.Carew, and A. W.Russell. 2006. Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38 (9):1046–1059. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C. 2015a. Cross-scale linkages in connectivity conservation: Adaptive governance challenges in spatially distributed networks. Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (1):1–15. doi:10.1002/eet.1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C. A. 2015b. Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: adaptive governance and connectivity conservation. Ecology and Society 20 (1):11. doi:10.5751/ES-06510-200111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C., and R. P.Bixler. 2013. Collaboration and nested environmental governance: Scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. Journal of Environmental Management 123:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R., L.A.King, and H.Schroeder, eds. 2008. Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zbicz, D. C. 2003. Imposing transboundary conservation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17 (1–2):21–37. doi:10.1300/J091v17n01_03.
   Google Scholar