“We Don’t Equal Even Just One Man”: Gender and Social Control in Conservation Adoption

References

• Adcock, L. 2014. Personal communication with Angie Carter. June 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. B., R. A. Smith, G. E. Schwarz, E. W. Boyer, J. V. Nolan, and J. W. Brakebill. 2008. Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi river basin. Environmental Science and Technology 42:822–30. doi: 10.1021/es0716103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbercheck, M., K. Brasier, N. E. Kiernan, C. Sachs, and A. Trauger. 2014. Use of conservation practices by women farmers in northeastern United States. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 29 (01):65–82. doi: 10.1017/S1742170512000348.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. (1966) 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Borland, K. 1991. “That’s not what i Said”: Interpretive conflict in oral narrative research. In Women’s words, eds. S. B. Gluck and D. Patai, 63–76. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandth, B. 1994. Changing femininity: the social construction of women farmers in Norway. Sociologia Ruralis 34:27–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregendahl, C., and M. Hoffman. 2010. Women, Land, and legacy (SM): change agents and agency change in Iowa: Evaluation results. November 2010. Leopold Center Pubs and Papers. 73. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/leopold_pubspapers/73 (accessed April 20, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. 2007. Feminist standpoint epistemology: Building knowledge and empowerment through women’s lived experience. In Feminist research practice: A primer, eds. S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. L. Levy, 53–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M., D. Mayerfeld, M. M. Bell, and R. Exner. 2004. Rented land: Barriers to sustainable agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69 (4):70A–5A.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. 2005. Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land: An examination of contesting social fields. Rural Sociology 70 (3):387–415. doi: 10.1526/0036011054831233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, A. 2017. Placeholders and changemakers: Women farmland owners navigating gendered experiences. Rural Sociology 82 (3):499–523. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D. A. 2010. The color of the land: Race, nation, and the politics of landownership in Oklahoma, 1832–1929. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2008. The grounded theory method in Handbook of Constructionist Research, eds. J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 397–412. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappe, M. B., and C. B. Flora. 1998. Gendered elements of the alternative agriculture paradigm. Rural Sociology 63 (3):372–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00684.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R., and J. W. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society 19 (6):829–59. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conservation Reserve Program. n.d. Farm services agency. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/conservation-reserve-program/ (accessed January 11, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C., A. Hug, and N. Bruzelius. 2011. Losing ground. Environmental Working Group. http://static.ewg.org/reports/2010/losingground/pdf/losingground_report.pdf (accessed April 20, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. 2007. Undoing gender. Gender and Society 21 (1):106–27. doi: 10.1177/0891243206293577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake Agricultural Law Center. 2018. Landowner’s guide to sustainable farm leasing. N.d. http://sustainablefarmlease.org/the-landowners-guide-to-sustainable-farm-leases/ (accessed August 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Druschke, C. G., and S. Secchi. 2014. The impact of gender on agricultural conservation knowledge and attitudes in an Iowa watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69 (2):95–106. doi: 10.2489/jswc.69.2.95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M., D. Smith, and J. Reutzel. 2008. Farmland ownership and tenure in Iowa 2007. Iowa State University Extension PM 1983. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/extension_pubs/68 (accessed March 2, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Ortiz, R. 2015. An indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eells, J. 2008. The land, it’s everything: Women landowners and the institution of agricultural conservation in the U.S. Midwest. PhD diss., Iowa State University, Ames, IA. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15704.
   Google Scholar
• Eells, J., and J. Soulis. 2013. Do women landowners count in agricultural conservation? A review of research on women landowners in the United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68 (5):121A–3A. doi: 10.2489/jswc.68.5.121A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, B. B. 1983. Soil conservation: A farm woman’s perspective. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (69). 38 (2):69. http://www.jswconline.org/content/38/2/69.extract.
   Google Scholar
• Feder, J., and T. Cowan. 2013. Garcia v. Vilsack: A policy and legal analysis of a USDA discrimination case. Congressional Research Service :R40988. http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/R40988.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 1982. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greider, T., and LE Garkovich. 1994. Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology 59 (1):1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00519.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, H. 1976. Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. Signs 1 (3, Part 2):137–68. doi: 10.1086/493283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanein, N. 1997. Networking knowledge in the sustainable agriculture movement: Some implications of the gender dimension. Society & Natural Resources 10 (3):251–7. doi: 10.1080/08941929709381024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. 1975. Sociological theory and social control. American Journal of Sociology 81 (1):82–108. doi: 10.1086/226035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. S., J. K. Nielsen, K. E. Schilling, and L. J. Weber. 2018. Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico. Plos ONE 13 (4):e0195930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckie, G. J. 1996. Female farmers and the social construction of access to agricultural information. Library and Information Science Research 18:291–321.
   Google Scholar
• Loseke, D. 2007. The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organizational, and personal narratives: theoretical and empirical integrations. The Sociological Quarterly 48 (4):661–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00096.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love v. Vilsack 2016. 1:00-cv-02502-RBW 267 (D.C). http://www.womenfarmers.com/Pl-Filing-re-USDA-OIG-report-20160419.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Naidenko, O. V., C. Cox, and N. Bruzelius. 2012. Troubled waters: Farm pollution threatens drinking water. Environmental Working Group. http://static.ewg.org/reports/2012/troubled_waters/troubled_waters.pdf (accessed April 20, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2014. QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10,
   Google Scholar
• Peter, G., M. Bell, S. Jarnagin, and D. Bauer. 2000. Coming back across the fence: Masculinity and the transition to sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociology 65 (2):215–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00026.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrzelka, P., A. Sorensen, and J. Filipiak. 2018. Women agricultural landowners—past time to put them on the radar. Society & Natural Resources 31 (7):853–64. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2017.1423435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrzelka, P., and S. Marquart-Pyatt. 2011. Land tenure in the U.S.: Power, gender, and consequences for conservation decision making. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (4):549–560. doi: 10.1007/s10460-011-9307-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pini, B. 2002. Focus groups, feminist research and farm women: Opportunities for empowerment in rural social research. Journal of Rural Studies 18 (3):339–51. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00007-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, C. 1983. The invisible farmers: Women in agricultural production. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld. doi: 10.1086/ahr/89.2.548-a.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, C., M. Barbercheck, K. Brasier, N. E. Kiernan, and A. R. Terman. 2016. The rise of women farmers and sustainable agriculture. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, S., and A. M. Keim. 1979. Land ownership and women’s power in a midwestern farming community. Journal of Marriage and Family 41 (1):109–19. doi: 10.2307/351736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, M., S. Godwin, D. Holden, D. Schroc, S. Thompson, and M. Wolkomir. 2000. Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: an interactionist analysis. Social Forces 79 (2):419–45. doi: 10.1093/sf/79.2.419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. 2004. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information 22 (2):63–75. doi: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
   Google Scholar
• Shorthall, S. 2001. Women in the field: Women, farming and organizations. Gender, Work and Organization 8 (2):164–81. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.00127.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trauger, A. 2001. Women farmers in Minnesota and the post-productivist tradition. The Great Lakes Geographer 8 (2):53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Trauger, A. 2004. Because they can do the work: Women farmers and sustainable agriculture in Pennsylvania, USA. Gender, Place and Culture 11 (2):289–307. doi: 10.1080/0966369042000218491.
   Google Scholar
• Trauger, A., C. Sachs, M. Barbercheck, N. E. Kiernan, K. Brasier, and J. Findeis. 2008. Agricultural education: Gender identity and knowledge exchange. Journal of Rural Studies 24 (4):432–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistical Service (USDA NASS). 2018. Census State Profile: Iowa. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=IOWA (accessed August 18, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Wells, B., and J. Eells. 2011. One size does not fit all: Customizing conservation to a changing demographic. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 66 (5):136A–9A. doi: 10.2489/jswc.66.5.136A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., and D. H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1 (2):125–51. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1994. Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective. Signs 19 (3):713–38. doi: 10.1086/494918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women, Food and Agriculture Network. (2012) 2013. In Improving conservation outreach to female non-operator farmland owners: Conservation education activities for conservation agencies, not-for-profit organizations, and community groups, eds. J. Eells and L. Adcock. http://www.wfan.org/our-programs/women-caring-for-the-landsm/curriculum-manual/ (accessed May 12, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., A. Plastina, and W. Sawadgo. 2018. Iowa farmland ownership and tenure survey 1982–2017: A thirty-five year perspective. Working Paper 18-WP 580, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/articles/zhang/ZhaJul18.html (accessed August 21, 2018).
   Google Scholar