Factors Influencing Adoption and Implementation of Conservation Development Ordinances in Rural United States

References

• Allen, S. C., C. E. Moorman, M. N. Peterson, G. R. Hess, and S. E. Moore. 2012. Overcoming socio-economic barriers to conservation subdivisions: A case study of four successful communities. Landscape and Urban Planning 106(3):244–52. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, A. T., B. Shouse, C. G. Hudson, and R. Goldburg. 2016. Science-policy intermediaries from a practitioner’s perspective: The Lenfest Ocean Program experience. Science and Public Policy 43(2):291–300. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beier, P., L. J. Hansen, L. Helbrecht, and D. Behar. 2017. A how-to guide for coproduction of actionable science. Conservation Letters 10(3):288–29. doi: 10.1111/conl.12300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. J., J. Blythe, S. Tyler, and N. C. Ban. 2016. Communities and change in the anthropocene: Understanding social-ecological vulnerability and planning adaptations to multiple interacting exposures. Regional Environmental Change 16(4):907–26. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0839-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., D. J. Roenigk, E. J. Kaiser, and R. Burby. 1996. Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 39(1):79–96. doi: 10.1080/09640569612688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierwagen, B. G., D. M. Theobald, C. R. Pyke, A. Choate, P. Groth, J. V. Thomas, and P. Morefield. 2010. National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(49):20887–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002096107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. H. 2015. Grassroots innovation for urban sustainability: Comparing the diffusion pathways of three ecovillage projects. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47(2):320–37. doi: 10.1068/a140250p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. M., B. W. Eisenhauer, and R. C. Stedman. 2013. Environmental concern: examining the role of place meaning and place attachment. Society & Natural Resources 26(5):522–38. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.715726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg, L. 2003. Conserving ecosystems locally: A role for ecologists in land-use planning. BioScience 53(7):670–3. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0670:CELARF]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. G., K. M. Johnson, T. R. Loveland, and D. M. Theobald. 2005. Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecological Applications 15(6):1851–63. doi: 10.1890/03-5220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadieux, K. V., and P. T. Hurley. 2011. Amenity migration, exurbia, and emerging rural landscapes: Global natural amenity as place and as process. GeoJournal 76(4):297–302. doi: 10.1007/s10708-009-9335-0.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen. 2013. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research 42 (3):294–320. doi: 10.1177/0049124113500475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrill, J. G., and S. L. Senecah. 2001. Using the ‘sense of self-in-place’ construct in the context of environmental policy-making and landscape planning. Environmental Science & Policy 4(4–5):185–203. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00023-5.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, T. 2009. Developing conservation subdivisions: Ecological constraints, regulatory barriers, and market incentives. Landscape and Urban Planning 92(2):117–24. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., J. C. Borck, and A. G. Patt. 2006. Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: Comparative analysis of El Ninõ/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Science, Technology, and Human Values 31(4):465–94. doi: 10.1177/0162243906287547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. L. E. S., C. Tenopir, S. Allard, and M. T. Frame. 2014. Facilitating access to biodiversity information: A survey of users’ needs and practices. Environmental Management 53(3):690–701. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0229-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., R. C. Feiock, and K. Wassel. 2017. Urban pressures and innovations: Sustainability commitment in the face of fragmentation and inequality. Review of Policy Research 34(5):700–24. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, C., L. Pejchar, and S. Reed. 2017. Subdivision design and stewardship affect bird and mammal use of conservation developments. Ecological Applications 27(4):1236–52. doi: 10.1002/eap.1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, C. M., S. E. Reed, and L. Pejchar. 2018. How often are conservation developments managed for biodiversity protection? A case study in Colorado, U.S.A. Landscape and Urban Planning 169:105–14. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Tavares, A. F. M. Lubell, M. 2008. Policy instrument choices for growth management and land use regulation. Policy Studies Journal 36(3):461–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennon, M. J., and H. E. Kretser. 2013. Size of the ecological effect zone associated with exurban development in the Adirondack Park, NY. Landscape and Urban Planning 112:10–7. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Challenges Research Team on Conservation Development. 2014. What is conservation development. http://cd.colostate.edu/conservation-development-overview (accessed November 15, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, E. J., and A. L. Jr, Haines. 2014. Zoning for sustainability: A review and analysis of the zoning ordinances of 32 cities in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association 80(3):239–52. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2014.981200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartez, J. D., and M. P. Casto. 2008. Information into action: Biodiversity data outreach and municipal land conservation. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(4):467–80. doi: 10.1080/01944360802378096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretser, H. E., and S. E Reed. 2012. Review of conservation development ordinances in the Northeast. In Protecting wildlife connectivity through land use planning: Best management practices and the role of conservation development, ed. Smith. Wildlife Conservation Society, Adirondack Program Technical Paper #4.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., T. B. Lauber, D. L. Kay, and B. B. Cutts. 2017. Local government capacity to respond to environmental change: Insights from Towns in New York State. Environmental Management 60(1):118–35. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0860-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauber, T. B. L., R. C. Stedman, D. J. Decker, and B. A. Knuth. 2011. Linking knowledge to action in collaborative conservation. Conservation Biology 25(6):1186–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01742.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, V. R., K. P. Bell, and A. J. K. Calhoun. 2017. Planning for sustainability in small municipalities: The influence of interest groups, growth patterns and institutional characteristics. Journal of Planning Education and Research 37(3):322–33. doi: 10.1177/0739456X16655601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, V. R., A. J. K. Calhoun, K. P. Bell, and T. R. Johnson. 2017. Turning contention in to collaboration: Engaging power, trust, and learning in collaborative networks. Society & Natural Resources 30(2):245–60. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1180726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, C. M., and A. R. Rissman. 2015. Factors influencing zoning ordinance adoption in rural and exurban townships. Landscape and Urban Planning 134:167–76. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, T. G., B. L. Preston, T. F. Smith, C. Brooke, R. Gorddard, G. Withycombe, and C. Morrison. 2011. Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 16(8):889–909. doi: 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milder, J. C., and S. Clark. 2011. Conservation development practices, extent, and land-use effects in the United States. Conservation Biology 23:53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. R., M. Groom, G. R. Hess, T. Steelman, D. L. Stokes, J. Thompson, T. Bowman, L. Fricke, B. King, and R. Marquardt. 2009. Biodiversity in local planning. Conservation Biology 23(1):53–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01110.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mockrin, M. H., S. I. Stewart, M. S. Matonis, K. M. Johnson, R. B. Hammer, and V. C. Radeloff. 2018. Sprawling and diverse: The changing U.S. population and implications for public lands in the 21st Century. Journal of Environmental Management 215:153–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mockrin, M. H., S. E. Reed, L. Pejchar, and J. Salo. 2017. Balancing housing growth and land conservation: Conservation development preserves private lands near protected areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 157:598–607. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J. 2016. Iterative categorization (IC): a systematic technique for analysing qualitative data. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 111(6):1096–106. doi: 10.1111/add.13314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney, K. E. 2013. Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. E., J. A. Hilty, and D. M. Theobald. 2014. Guidelines and incentives for conservation development in local land-use regulations. Conservation Biology 28(1):258–68. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, S. E., A. J. K. Calhoun, C. Farr, D. Fischer, M. Glennon, M. Hostetler, H. Kretser, S. Lerman, C. Nilon, and L. Pejchar. 2016. Conservation design and stewardship guidelines for local land-use regulations. Final report to the USDA Forest service open space conservation program. Bozeman, MT: Wildlife Conservation Society, North America Program.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, W. A. 2016. Environmental politics and policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steelman, T. A., and G. R. Hess. 2009. Effective protection of open space: Does planning matter? Environmental Management 44(1):93–104. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9272-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, D. M., N. T. Hobbs, T. Bearly, J. A. Zack, T. Shenk, and W. E. Riebsame. 2000. Incorporating biological information in local land‐use decision making: Designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecology 15(1):35–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1008165311026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. E. M., K. R. Jones, R. A. Fuller, M. Di Marco, D. B. Segan, S. H. M. Butchart, J. R. Allan, E. McDonald-Madden, and O. Venter. 2016. Persistent disparities between recent rates of habitat conversion and protection and implications for future global conservation targets. Conservation Letters 9(6):413–21. doi: 10.1111/conl.12295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2010. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar