457
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Beyond “Us and Them”: Why Do Landowners Disagree About Local Water Pollution?

, &
Pages 1200-1221 | Received 08 Sep 2018, Accepted 20 Apr 2019, Published online: 27 May 2019

References

  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):543–71. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
  • Armstrong, A., and R. C. Stedman. 2012. Landowner willingness to implement riparian buffers in a transitioning watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning 105 (3):211–20. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.011.
  • Armstrong, A., and R. C. Stedman. 2013. Culture clash and second home ownership in the US Northern Forest. Rural Sociology 78 (3):318–45. doi:10.1111/ruso.12010.
  • Babin, N., N. D. Mullendore, and L. S. Prokopy. 2016. Using social criteria to select watersheds for non-point source agricultural pollution abatement projects. Land Use Policy 55:327–33. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.021.
  • Bonnell, J. E., and T. M. Koontz. 2007. Stumbling forward: The organizational challenges of building and sustaining collaborative watershed management. Society and Natural Resources 20 (2):153–67. doi:10.1080/08941920601052412.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Vol. 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of Capital handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. In The power broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York, ed. J. G. Richardson, 241–58. New York: Greenwood.
  • Brehm, J. M., B. W. Eisenhauer, and R. C. Stedman. 2013. Environmental concern: Examining the role of place meaning and place attachment. Society and Natural Resources 26 (5):522–38. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.715726.
  • Brønn, P. S., and C. Brønn. 2003. A reflective stakeholder approach: Co-orientation as a basis for communication and learning. Journal of Communication Management 7 (4):291–303. doi:10.1108/13632540310807430.
  • Busse, R., J. D. Ulrich-Schad, L. Crighton, S. Peel, K. Genskow, and L. S. Prokopy. 2015. Using social indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of outreach in two Indiana watersheds. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education 156:5–20. doi:10.1111/j.1936-704X.2015.03200.x.
  • Cayuga County Government. 2018. Owasco Lake Management Council. http://www.cayugacounty.us/Community/Health/Environmental-Health/OLWMC (accessed September 8, 2018).
  • Crow, D. A., and O. Baysha. 2013. Conservation’ as a catalyst for conflict: Considering stakeholder understanding in policy making. Review of Policy Research 30 (3):302–20. doi:10.1111/ropr.12020.
  • Ferreyra, C., R. C. de Loe, and R. D. Kreutzwiser. 2008. Imagined communities, contested watersheds: Challenges to integrated water resources management in agricultural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 24 (3):304–21. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.11.001.
  • Floress, K., L. S. Prokopy, and S. B. Allred. 2011. It’s who you know: Social capital, social networks, and watershed groups. Society and Natural Resources 24 (9):871–86. doi:10.1080/08941920903493926.
  • Gosnell, H., and J. Abrams. 2011. Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal 76 (4):303–22. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4.
  • Gosnell, H., J. H. Haggerty, and P. A. Byorth. 2007. Ranch ownership change and new approaches to water resource management in southwestern Montana: Implications for fisheries. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43 (4):990–1003. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00081.x.
  • Hancock, G. R., and R. O. Mueller. 2004. Path analysis. In The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, ed. M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, and T. F. Liao, 803–806. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 
  • Homer, C., J. Dewitz, L. Yang, S. Jin, P. Danielson, G. Xian, J. Coulston, N. Herold, J. Wickham, and K. Megown. 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States: Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 81 (5):345–54.
  • Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Jackson-Smith, D., M. Dolan, G. Holyoak, C. G. Flint, C. K. Trentelman, B. Thomas, and G. Ma. 2016. Effectiveness of the drop-off/pick-up survey methodology in different neighborhood types. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 31 (3):35.
  • Johnson, E. S., K. P. Bell, and J. E. Leahy. 2017. Changing course: Comparing emerging watershed institutions in river restoration contexts. Society and Natural Resources 30 (6):765–81. doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1239292.
  • Kaplowitz, M. D., and S. G. Witter. 2008. Agricultural and residential stakeholder input for watershed management in a mid-Michigan watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning 84 (1):20–7. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.004.
  • Kiser, L. L., and E. Ostrom. 1982. The three worlds of action: A metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In Strategies of political inquiry, ed. E. Ostrom, 179–220. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Koontz, T. M., and E. M. Johnson. 2004. One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences 37 (2):185–204. doi:10.1023/B:OLIC.0000048532.94150.07.
  • Larsson, L., and D. K. Müller. 2017. Coping with second home tourism: Responses and strategies of private and public service providers in western Sweden. Current Issues in Tourism. doi:10.1080/13683500.2017.1411339.
  • Lubell, M. 2005. Do watershed partnerships enhance beliefs conducive to collective action? In Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management ed. P. A. Sabatier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, 201–232. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Margerum, R. D. 2011. Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McGinnis, M. D. 2011. An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1):169–83. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x.
  • Moran, E. C., and D. O. Woods. 2009. Comprehensive watershed planning in New York State: The Conesus Lake example. Journal of Great Lakes Research 35:10–4. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2008.07.001.
  • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC). 2016. Owasco lake (0706-0009). New York: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
  • Newcomb, T. M. 1953. An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review 60 (6):393 doi:10.1037/h0063098.
  • Oliver, C., and K. O’Reilly. 2010. A Bourdieusian analysis of class and migration: Habitus and the individualizing process. Sociology 44 (1):49–66. doi:10.1177/0038038509351627.
  • Ostrom, E. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1):7–27. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x.
  • Owasco Watershed Lake Association (OWLA). 2014. New York State DEC: Prohibit the application of liquid manure on frozen and/or snow-covered soils. https://www.change.org/p/joseph-martens-new-york-state-dec-prohibit-the-application-of-liquid-manure-on-frozen-and-or-snow-covered-soils (accessed January 11, 2019).
  • Park, M., M. Derrien, E. Geczi, and P. A. Stokowski. 2019. Grappling with growth: Perceptions of development and preservation in faster- and slower-growing amenity communities. Society and Natural Resources 32 (1):73–92. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1501527.
  • Perry-Hill, R., and L. S. Prokopy. 2014. Comparing different types of rural landowners: Implications for conservation practice adoption. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69 (3):266–78. doi:10.2489/jswc.69.3.266.
  • Porter, J. J., and K. Birdi. 2018. 22 Reasons why collaborations fail: Lessons from water innovation research. Environmental Science & Policy 89:100–8. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.004.
  • Price, M. L, and D. C. Clay. 1980. Structural disturbances in rural communities: Some repercussions of the migration turnaround in Michigan. Rural Sociology 45:591–607.
  • Prokopy, L. S., and K. Genskow. 2016. Social indicator variations across watersheds: Implications for developing outreach and technical assistance programs. Society and Natural Resources 29 (5):617–27. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1081310.
  • Prokopy, L. S., N. Mullendore, K. Brasier, and K. Floress. 2014. A typology of catalyst events for collaborative watershed management in the United States. Society and Natural Resources 27 (11):1177–91. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.918230.
  • Reimer, A. P., D. K. Weinkauf, and L. S. Prokopy. 2012. The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds. Journal of Rural Studies 28 (1):118–28. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.005.
  • Sabatier, P. A., W. D. Leach, M. Lubell, and N. W. Pelkey. 2005. Theoretical frameworks explaining partnership success. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management :173–200.
  • Shadish, W. R., T. D. Cook, and D. T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  • Sherman, J. 2018. Not allowed to inherit my kingdom: Amenity development and social inequality in the rural west. Rural Sociology 83 (1):174–207. doi:10.1111/ruso.12168.
  • Smith, M. D., and R. S. Krannich. 2009. Culture clash’ revisited: Newcomer and longer-term residents’ attitudes toward land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain West. Rural Sociology 65 (3):396–421. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00036.x.
  • Stedman, R. C. 2006. Understanding place attachment among second homeowners. American Behavioral Scientist 50 (2):187–205. doi:10.1177/0002764206290633.
  • Stedman, R. C., B. Lee, K. Brasier, J. L. Weigle, and F. Higdon. 2009. Cleaning up water? Or building rural community? Community watershed organizations in Pennsylvania. Rural Sociology 74 (2):178–200. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.tb00388.x.
  • Steele, J., L. Bourke, A. E. Luloff, P. Liao, G. L. Theodori, and R. S. Krannich. 2001. The drop-off/pick-up method for household survey research. Journal of the Community Development Society 32 (2):238–50. doi:10.1080/15575330109489680.
  • Theodori, G. L. 2005. Community and community development in resource-based areas: Operational definitions rooted in an interactional perspective. Society and Natural Resources 18 (7):661–9. doi:10.1080/08941920590959640.
  • Trachtenberg, Z., and W. Focht. 2005. Legitimacy and watershed collaborations: The role of public participation. In Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management, eds. P. A. Sabaier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, M. Matlock. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2016. American Community Survey – 5 year estimates. 2010 Decennial Census General Population and Housing Characteristics.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. 2010 Demographic Profile Data. Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. Harmful Algal Blooms. https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/harmful-algal-blooms (accessed January 11, 2019).
  • Ulrich-Schad, J. D., and H. Qin. 2018. Culture clash? Predictors of views on amenity-led development and community involvement in rural recreation counties. Rural Sociology 83 (1):81–108. doi:10.1111/ruso.12165.
  • Weible, C. M., S. N. Siddiki, and J. J. Pierce. 2011. Foes to friends: Changing contexts and changing intergroup perceptions. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 13 (5):499–525. doi:10.1080/13876988.2011.605941.
  • Wenger, E. 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7 (2):225–46. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.
  • Wilkinson, K. P. 1991. The community in rural america. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Winkler, R. 2013. Living on lakes: Segregated communities and inequality in a natural amenity destination. The Sociological Quarterly 54 (1):105–29. doi:10.1111/tsq.12002.
  • Winkler, R., D. R. Field, A. E. Luloff, R. S. Krannich, and T. Williams. 2007. Social landscapes of the Inter-Mountain West: A comparison of ‘old west’ and ‘new west’ communities. Rural Sociology 72 (3):478–501. doi:10.1526/003601107781799281.
  • Winkler, R., R. L. Schewe, and D. Matarrita-Cascante. 2013. Lakes and community: The importance of natural landscapes in social research. Society and Natural Resources 26 (2):158–75. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.739526.
  • Wright, J., and D. Haight. 2011. Owasco lake agricultural conservation blueprint. Saratoga Springs, NY: American Farmland Trust.
  • Yoder, L., and R. R. Chowdhury. 2018. Tracing social capital: How stakeholder group interactions shape agricultural water quality restoration in the Florida Everglades. Land Use Policy 77:354–61. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.038.
  • Yung, L., and J. M. Belsky. 2007. Private property rights and community goods: Negotiating landowner cooperation amid changing ownership on the rocky mountain front. Society and Natural Resources 20 (8):689–703. doi:10.1080/08941920701216586.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.