230
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Role of Forum Membership Diversity on Institutional Externalities in Resource Governance Systems

, &
Pages 1239-1257 | Received 21 Dec 2018, Accepted 04 Jul 2019, Published online: 05 Aug 2019

References

  • Ananda, J., and W. Proctor. 2013. Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics 86:97–106. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.018.
  • Anderies, J. M., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of social–ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9(1):18. doi:10.5751/ES-00610-090118.
  • Angst, M. 2018. Bottom-up identification of subsystems in complex governance systems. Policy Studies Journal. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12301
  • Angst, M. 2019. Networks of Swiss water governance issues. Studying fit between media attention and organizational activity. Society & Natural Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1535102.
  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4):543–71. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
  • Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 1991. Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics 53(4):1044–74. doi:10.2307/2131866.
  • Bednar, J., and S..Page. 2007. Can game(s) theory explain culture? The emergence of cultural behavior within multiple games. Rationality and Society 19(1):65–97. doi:10.1177/1043463107075108.
  • Beierle, T. C., and J. Cayford. 2002. Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Berardo, R., and M. Lubell. 2016. Understanding what shapes a polycentric governance system. Public Administration Review 76(5):738–51. doi:10.1111/puar.12532.
  • Berardo, R., and M. Lubell. 2019. The ecology of games as a theory of polycentricity: Recent advances and future challenges. Policy Studies Journal 47(1):6–26. doi:10.1111/psj.12313.
  • Berardo, R., T. Olivier, and A. Lavers. 2015. Focusing events and changes in ecologies of policy games: Evidence from the Paraná River Delta. Review of Policy Research 32(4):443–64. doi:10.1111/ropr.12128.
  • Bodin, O., and B. I. Crona. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19(3):366–74. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002.
  • Booher, D. E. 2004. Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National Civic Review 93(4):32–46. doi:10.1002/ncr.69.
  • Booher, D. E., and J. E. Innes. 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(3):221–36. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100301.
  • Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and M. Middleton-Stone. 2006. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review 66(s1):44–55. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x.
  • Budescu, D. V., and M. Budescu. 2012. How to measure diversity when you must. Psychological Methods 17(2):215–27. doi:10.1037/a0027129.
  • Burby, R. J. 2003. Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(1):33–49. doi:10.1080/01944360308976292.
  • Burt, R. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social Capital. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94:S95–120. doi:10.1086/228943.
  • Crona, B. I., and J. N. Parker. 2011. Network determinants of knowledge utilization: Preliminary lessons from a boundary organization. Science Communication 33(4):448–71. doi:10.1177/1075547011408116.
  • Crona, B. I., and J. N. Parker. 2012. Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society 17(1):32. doi:10.5751/ES-04534-170132.
  • Dür, A., and D. De Bièvre. 2007. The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy 27(1):1–12. doi:10.1017/S0143814X07000591.
  • Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review 38(4):717–47. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016.
  • Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(1):1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011.
  • Fischer, M., and P. Leifeld. 2015. Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for? Policy Sciences 48(3):363–82. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y.
  • Fischer, M., and S. Maag. 2019. Why are cross-sectoral forums important to actors? Forum contributions to cooperation, learning and resource distribution. Policy Studies Journal 47(1):114–37. doi:10.1111/psj.12310.
  • Fischer, M., and I. Schläpfer. 2017. Metagovernance and policy forum outputs in Swiss environmental politics. Environmental Politics 26(5):870–92. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1284981.
  • Gerlak, A., T. Heikkila, S. Molinski, D. Huitema, and D. Armitage. 2018. Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: A review of the scholarship. Policy Sciences 51:1–37. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0.
  • Gilardi, F. 2010. Who learns from? What in Policy Diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science 54(3):650–66. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.x.
  • Hamilton, M. L., and M. Lubell. 2019. Climate change adaptation, social capital, and the performance of polycentric governance institutions. Climatic Change 152(3–4):307–20. doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02380-2.
  • Hardy, S. D., and T. M. Koontz. 2009. Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. Policy Studies Journal 37(3):393–414. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00320.x.
  • Heikkila, T., S..Villamayor-Tomas, and D..Garrick. 2018. Bringing polycentric systems into focus for environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance 28(4):207–318. doi:10.1002/eet.1809.
  • Heikkila, T., and A. K. Gerlak. 2013. Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal 41(3):484–512. doi:10.1111/psj.12026.
  • Herzog, L. M., and K. Ingold. 2019. Threats to common‐pool resources and the importance of forums: On the emergence of cooperation in CPR problem settings. Policy Studies Journal 47(1):77–113. doi:10.1111/psj.12308.
  • Hileman, J., and Ö. Bodin. 2019. Balancing costs and benefits of collaboration in an ecology of games. Policy Studies Journal 47(1):138–58. doi:10.1111/psj.12292.
  • Huxham, C., S. Vangen, C. Huxham, and C. Eden. 2000. The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 2(3):337–58. doi:10.1080/14719030000000021.
  • Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative. Journal of the American Planning Association 65(4):412–23. doi:10.1080/01944369908976071.
  • Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2004. Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice 5(4):419–36. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170.
  • Jasny, L., and M. Lubell. 2015. Two-mode brokerage in policy networks. Social Networks 41:36–47. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.11.005.
  • Jones, M. D., and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 2009. Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 37(1):37–58. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00294.x.
  • Koontz, T. M., and E. Moore Johnson. 2004. One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed groups accomplishments. Policy Sciences 37(2):185–204. doi:10.1023/B:OLIC.0000048532.94150.07.
  • Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. Smith Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. W. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
  • Koontz, T. M., and C. W. Thomas. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66(s1):111–21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x.
  • Lampert, A., A. Hastings, E. D. Grosholz, S. L. Jardine, and J. N. Sanchirico. 2014. Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management. Science 344(6187):1028–31. doi:10.1126/science.1250763.
  • Leach, W. D., C. M. Weible, S. R. Vince, S. N. Siddiki, and J. C. Calanni. 2014. Fostering learning through collaboration: Knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(3):591–622. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut011.
  • Lubell, M. 2003. Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly 56(3):309–23. doi:10.1177/106591290305600306.
  • Lubell, M. 2013. Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. Policy Studies Journal 41(3):537–59. doi:10.1111/psj.12028.
  • Lubell, M., A. D. Henry, and M. McCoy. 2010. Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science 54(2):287–300. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00431.x.
  • Lubell, M., J. Mewhirter, R. Berardo, and J. T. Scholz. 2017. Transaction costs and the perceived effectiveness of complex institutional systems. Public Administration Review 77(5):668–80. doi:10.1111/puar.12622.
  • Lubell, M., G. Robins, and P. Wang. 2014. Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games. Ecology and Society 19(4):23. doi:10.5751/ES-06880-190423.
  • Maag, S., and M. Fischer. 2018. Why Government, interest groups, and research coordinate: The different purposes of forums. Society & Natural Resources 31(11):1248–65. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1484973.
  • Mancilla García, M., and Ö. Bodin. 2019. Participation in multiple decision-making water governance forums in Brazil enhances actors’ perceived level of influence. Policy Studies Journal 47(1):27–51. doi:10.1111/psj.12297.
  • Margerum, R. 2011. Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McAllister, R. J., R. McCrea, and M. N. Lubell. 2014. Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland. Regional Environmental Change 14(2):527–39. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0489-4.
  • Mewhirter, J., and R. Berardo. 2019. The impact of forum interdependence and network structure on actor performance in complex governance systems. Policy Studies Journal 47(1):159–77. doi:10.1111/psj.12302.
  • Mewhirter, J., E. A. Coleman, and R. Berardo. 2017. Participation and political influence in complex governance systems. Policy Studies Journal. Advance online version. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12227
  • Mewhirter, J., M. Lubell, and R. Berardo. 2018. Institutional externalities and actor performance in polycentric governance systems. Environmental Policy and Governance 28(4):295–307. doi:10.1002/eet.1816.
  • Moore, E., and T. M. Koontz. 2003. A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 16(5):451–60. doi:10.1080/08941920309182.
  • Newig, J., and O. Fritsch. 2009. Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level–and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance 19(3):197–214. doi:10.1002/eet.509.
  • Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling alone: Collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., and A. Skrondal. 2012. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. Vol II. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
  • Reed, M. S., A. C. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, J. Newig, B. Parrish, C. Prell, C. Raymond, et al. 2010. What is social learning? Ecology and Society 15(4):r1. doi:10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01.
  • Scharpf, F. W. 1988. The joint‐decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration 66(3):239–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x.
  • Selsky, J. W., and B. Parker. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management 31(6):849–87. doi:10.1177/0149206305279601.
  • Siddiki, S., J. Kim, and W. D. Leach. 2017. Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review 77(6):863–74. doi:10.1111/puar.12800.
  • Smaldino, P. E., and M. Lubell. 2011. An institutional mechanism for assortment in an ecology of games. PLoS One 6(8):e23019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023019.
  • Weible, C. M. 2008. Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal 36(4):615–35. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x.
  • Weible, C. M., and P. A. Sabatier. 2009. Coalitions, science, and belief change: Comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Studies Journal 37(2):195–212. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00310.x.
  • Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.