Assessing Collaborative Governance Outcomes and Indicators across Spatial and Temporal Scales: Stewardship Contract Implementation by the United States Forest Service

References

• Abrams, J., and S. Burns. 2007. Case study of a community stewardship success: The White Mountain Stewardship contract. Flagstaff, AZ: Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):543–71. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Berkes, F. and Doubleday, N. eds. 2010. Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentrup, G. 2001. Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study analysis of watershed planning in the intermountain west. Environmental Management 27 (5):739–48. doi:10.1007/s002670010184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummel, R. F., K. C. Nelson, and P. J. Jakes. 2012. Burning through organizational boundaries? Examining inter-organizational communication networks in policy-mandated collaborative bushfire planning groups. Global Environmental Change 22 (2):516–28. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, T. A. 2004. Tragedy averted: The promise of collaboration. Society & Natural Resources 17:881–96. doi:10.1080/08941920490505284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, S., and A. S. Cheng. 2005. The Utilization of Collaborative Processes in Forest Planning. Durango, CO: Office of Community Services, Fort Lewis College.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, W. Hale. 2013. Collaboration at arm’s length: Navigating agency engagement in landscape-scale ecological restoration collaboratives. Journal of Forestry 111 (6):395–403. doi:10.5849/jof.13-027
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, J. B., K. J. Barrett, B. M. Gannon, R. N. Addington, M. A. Battaglia, P. J. Fornwalt, G. H. Aplet, A. S. Cheng, J. L. Underhill, J. S. Briggs, P. M. Brown, et al. 2018. Collaborative restoration effects on forest structure in ponderosa pine-dominated forests of Colorado. Forest Ecology and Management 424:191–204. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D. S., S. W. Selin, and M. A. Schuett. 1998. Managing public forests: Understanding the role of collaborative planning. Environmental Management 22 (5):767–76. doi:10.1007/s002679900146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEQ-Council on Environmental Quality. 2007. Collaboration in NEPA: A Handbook for NEPA practitioners. Washington, DC: Council on Environmental Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Charnley, S., E. M. Donoghue, and C. Moseley. 2008. Forest management policy and community well-being in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Forestry 106 (8):440–7. doi10.1093/jof/106.8.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. S. 2006. Build it and they will come? Mandating collaboration in public lands planning and management. Natural Resources Journal 46 (4):841–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. S., A. K. Gerlak, L. Dale, and K. Mattor. 2015. Examining the adaptability of collaborative governance associated with publicly managed ecosystems over time: Insights from the Front Range Roundtable, Colorado, USA. Ecology and Society 20 (1):35. doi:10.5751/ES-07187-200135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. S., and V. E. Sturtevant. 2012. A framework for assessing collaborative capacity in community-based public forest management. Environmental Management 49 (3):675–89. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9801-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A., and M. A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 16 (5):371–86. doi:10.1080/08941920309181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortner, H. J., and M. A. Moote. 1999. The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. P. Clark. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, C. 2005. Community-based forestry goes to Washington. In Adaptive governance: Integrating science, policy, and decision making, ed. R. D. Brunner, T. A. Steelman, L. Coe-Juell, C. Cromley, C. Edwards, and D. Tucker, 221–67. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S. E., and G. B. Walker. 2001. Working through environmental conflict:  The collaborative learning approach. Westport Conn., London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. M., M. Nielsen-Pincus, M. Paruszkiewicz, and N. Poage. 2018. The economic contribution of stewardship contracting: Two case studies from the Mount Hood National Forest. Journal of Forestry 116 (3):245–56. doi:10.1093/jofore/fvx020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, M. A., D. H. Anderson, J. E. Leahy, and P. J. Jakes. 2007. Reflections from USDA Forest Service employees on institutional constraints to engaging and serving their local communities. Journal of Forestry 105 (1):43–8. doi:10.1093/jof/105.1.43. 
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. J., E. M. White, L. K. Cerveny, D. Seesholtz, M. L. Nuss, and D. R. Ulrich. 2017. Comparison of USDA Forest Service and stakeholder motivations and experiences in collaborative federal forest governance in the western United States. Environmental Management 60 (5):908–21. doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0913-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. 2013. The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K. 2003. Community-based collaboration in national forest management: Experiences in two Oregon stewardship contracting pilots. The Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. 1985. Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations 38 (10):911–36. doi:10.1177/001872678503801001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausbeck, K. 2007. The little engine that could: The success of the stewardship contracting authority. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 32 (33):33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. L., and B. E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (4):412–23. doi:10.1080/01944369908976071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, J. 2010. The practice and economics of stewardship contracting: A case study of the Clearwater stewardship project. Forest Products Journal 60 (3):213–20. doi:10.13073/0015-7473-60.3.213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., and C. W. Thomas. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66 (s1):111–21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D. 2006. Public involvement in USDA Forest Service policymaking: A literature review. Journal of Forestry 104 (1):43–9. doi:10.1093/jof/104.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, R. M. 2002. Working across boundaries: Making collaboration work in Government and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mandarano, L. A. 2008. Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes: Restoring and protecting habitat and the New York–New Jersey harbor estuary Program. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27 (4):456–68. doi:10.1177/0739456X08315888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management 41 (4):487–500. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattor, K. M. 2013. Evolving institutions of environmental governance: The collaborative implementation of stewardship contracts by the USDA Forest Service. PhD. diss., Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mattor, K. M., and A. S. Cheng. 2015. Contextual factors influencing collaboration levels and outcomes in national forest stewardship contracting. Review of Policy Research 32 (6):723–44. doi:10.1111/ropr.12151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsos, M., and P. C. Ringgold. 2001. Testing stewardship concepts on federal land. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 13 (1–2):305–20. doi:10.1300/J091v13n01_07.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, A. S., and W. H. Butler. 2016. Responding to a policy mandate to collaborate: Structuring collaboration in the collaborative forest landscape restoration program. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59 (6):1054–72. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1053562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moote, M. A. 2008. Collaborative forest management. In Forest community connections: Implications for research, management, and governance, ed. E. M. Donoghue, and V. E. Sturtevant, 243–60. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., and S. Charnley. 2014. Understanding micro-processes of institutionalization: stewardship contracting and national forest management. Policy Sciences 47 (1):69–98. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9190-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, C. 2010. Strategies for Supporting Frontline Collaboration: Lessons from Stewardship Contracting. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., and Y. E. Reyes. 2008. Forest restoration and forest communities: Have local communities benefited from Forest Service contracting of ecosystem management? Environmental Management 42 (2):327–43. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9116-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottek-Lucas, A., Y.-S. Kim, B. Greco, D. R. Becker, E. E. Hjerpe, and J. Abrams. 2017. Social and economic contributions of the White Mountain Stewardship project: Final 10-year assessment—lessons learned and implications for future forest management initiatives. Journal of Forestry 115 (6):548–58. doi:10.5849/JOF-2016-008R3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Erickson, T. A., B. Aguilar-Gonzalez, and T. D. Sisk. 2007. Linking ecosystem health indicators and collaborative management: A systematic framework to evaluate ecological and social outcomes. Ecology and Society 12 (2):6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen-Pincus, M., and C. Moseley. 2013. The economic and employment impacts of forest and watershed restoration. Restoration Ecology 21 (2):207–14. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00885.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagdee, A., Y.-S. Kim, and P. J. Daugherty. 2006. What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society & Natural Resources 19 (1):33–52. doi:10.1080/08941920500323260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PIC-Pinchot Institute for Conservation. 2014. The role of communities in stewardship contracting: FY 2013 programmatic monitoring report to the USDA Forest Service. Washington, DC: Pinchot Institute for Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• PIC-Pinchot Institute for Conservation. 2018. Case studies of public engagement in stewardship contracting: FY 2017 programmatic monitoring report to the USDA Forest Service. Washington, DC: Pinchot Institute for Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Poteete, A. R., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2010. Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolle, S. 2002. Measures of progress for collaboration: Case study of the applegate partnership. PNW-GTR-565, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1990. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics 52 (2):510–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schusler, T. M., D. J. Decker, and M. J. Pfeffer. 2003. Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 16 (4):309–26. doi:10.1080/08941920390178874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. A., T. Jedd, and R. D. Beam. 2012. The collaborative forest landscape restoration program: A history and overview of the first projects. Journal of Forestry 110 (7):381–91. doi:10.5849/jof.11-082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. A., K. B. Mclntyre, L. Cyphers, C. Kooistra, A. Ellison, and C. Moseley. 2018. Policy design to support forest restoration: The value of focused investment and collaboration. Forests 9 (9):512. doi:10.3390/f9090512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, S. W., M. A. Schuett, and D. S. Carr. 2000. Modeling stakeholder perceptions of collaborative initiative effectiveness. Society & Natural Resources 13 (8):735–45. doi:10.1080/089419200750035593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, S. W., M. A. Schuett, and D. S. Carr. 1997. Has collaborative planning taken root in the national forests? Journal of Forestry 95 (5):25–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitko, S., and S. Hurteau. 2010. Evaluating the impacts of forest treatments: The first five years of the White Mountain Stewardship Project. Phoenix, AZ: The Nature Conservancy.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, V. E., M. A. Moote, P. Jakes, and A. S. Cheng. 2005. Social science to improve fuels management: A synthesis of research on collaboration. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, V. E., and J. I. Lange. 1996. Applegate partnership case study: Group dynamics and community context. Ashland, OR: Departments of Sociology, Anthropology and Communication, Southern Oregon State College.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Craig W, and Tomas M.Koontz. 2011. Research designs for evaluating the impact of community-based management on natural resource conservation. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3 (2):97–111. doi:10.1080/19390459.2011.557877.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. R., W. F. Elmendorf, M. H. Mcdonough, and L. L. Burban. 2005. Participation and conflict: Lessons learned from community forestry. Journal of Forestry 103 (4):174–8. doi:10.1093/jof/103.4.174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske, Jerry J. 2008. Survey research analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review 66 (S1):20–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA Forest Service. 2016. Renewable resources handbook, Chapter 60, Stewardship Contracting. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. K., and T. W. Crawford. 2008. Tracking collaboration: Forest planning and local participation on the San Juan National Forest, Colorado. Local Environment 13 (7):609–25. doi:10.1080/13549830802260134.
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J. M. 1988. Public lands conflict and resolution: Managing national forest disputes. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar