Concurrent Governance Processes of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act

References

• Berke, P. R., W. Lyles, and G. Smith. 2014. Impacts of federal and state hazard mitigation policies on local land use policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 34 (1):60–76. doi: 10.1177/0739456x13517004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummel, R. F., K. C. Nelson, and P. J. Jakes. 2012. Burning through organizational boundaries? Examining inter-organizational communication networks in policy-mandated collaborative bushfire planning groups. Global Environmental Change 22 (2):516–28. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L., and A. Sandström. 2007. Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons 2 (1):33–54. doi: 10.18352/ijc.20.
   Google Scholar
• Dahill-Brown, S. E., and L. Lavery. 2012. Implementing federal policy: Confronting state capacity and will. Politics and Policy 40 (4):557–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00368.x.
   Google Scholar
• Deyle, R. E., and R. A. Smith. 1998. Local government compliance with state planning mandates the effects of state implementation in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (4):457–69. doi: 10.1080/01944369808976004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, G., J. Pittman, S. M. Alexander, S. Berdej, T. Dyck, U. Kreitmair, K. J. Rathwell, S. Villamayor-Tomas, J. Vogt, and D. Armitage. 2015. Institutional fit and the sustainability of social–ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Famiglietti, J. S. 2014. The global groundwater crisis. Nature Climate Change 4 (11):945–8. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2007. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1):47–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2013. The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3):397–425. doi: 10.1111/psj.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. L. 2012. The future of environmental networks—governance and civil society in a global context. Futures 44 (9):787–96. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2012.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S., J. Chilton, G. Nijsten, and A. Richts. 2013. Groundwater—a global focus on the ‘Local' Resource. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (6):685–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. E., and W. H. Butler. 2010. Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (2):238–49. doi: 10.1080/01944361003646463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26 (4):399–408. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. 2007. Epistemic communities. In The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, ed. D. Bodansky, J. Brunnee, and E. Hey, 791–806. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. J., and P. L. Hupe. 2002. Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and practice. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. L., and M. J. Hill. 2016. And the rest is implementation. Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond great expectations. Public Policy and Administration 31 (2):103–21. doi: 10.1177/0952076715598828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., W. S. Hesterly, and S. P. Borgatti. 1997. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 22 (4):911–45. doi: 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, M., A. Milman, D. Owen, and A. T. Fisher. 2017. The importance of institutional design for distributed local-level governance of groundwater: The case of California’s sustainable groundwater management act. Water 9 (10):755. doi: 10.3390/w9100755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S., and R. C. Feiock. 2010. Overcoming the barriers to cooperation: Intergovernmental service agreements. Public Administration Review 70 (6):876–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02219.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, T. C. 2015. Desperate times call for sensible measures: The making of the California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal 9 (1):5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lecy, J. D., I. A. Mergel, and H. P. Schmitz. 2014. Networks in public administration: Current scholarship in review. Public Management Review 16 (5):643–65. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.743577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., and A. Agrawal. 2006. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31 (1):297–329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1969. Toward a theory of street-level bureaucracy. Wisconsin: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Littleworth, A. L., and E. L. Garner. 2007. California Water II. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and M. Smith. 2000. Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies 48 (1):4–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman, A., L. Galindo, W. Blomquist, and E. Conrad. 2018. Establishment of agencies for local groundwater governance under California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Water Alternatives 11 (3):458–80. doi: 10.3390/w9100755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R. K. 2005. Local commitment to state-mandated planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (2):149–71. doi: 10.1177/0739456x05278984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, D. 2018. Cooperative subfederalism. UC Irvine Law Review 9:177.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, C., R. Heidl, and A. Wadhwa. 2012. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38 (4):1115–66. doi: 10.1177/0149206311432640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R., and A. William. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 44 (4):652–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. D., A. Milman and, W. Blomquist.2020. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act – California’s prescription for three common challenges of groundwater management. In Water resilience: Management and governance in times of change, ed. Julia Baird and Ryan Plummer. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rossignoli, C., and F. Ricciardi. 2015. Theories explaining inter-organizational relationships in terms of coordination and control needs. In Inter-organizational relationships, ed. Cecilia Rossignoli and Francesca Ricciardi, 7–36. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, J. L. 2002. We don’t do groundwater: A morsel of California legal history. University of Denver Water Law Review 6:269.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., and C. W. Thomas. 2017. Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: Why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies? Policy Studies Journal 45 (1):191–214. doi: 10.1111/psj.12162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance beyond the state. Urban Studies 42 (11):1991–2006. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., B. Steijn, and V. Bekkers. 2012. Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement public policies: Content, context, and personality characteristics. Public Administration 90 (3):716–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02016.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, R. G., A. Zuniga-Teran, A. Gerlak, and S. Megdal. 2016. Modes and approaches of groundwater governance: A survey of lessons learned from selected cases across the globe. Water 8 (10):417. doi: 10.3390/w8100417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N. 2015. Adaptation through collaboration: Evaluating the emergence of institutional arrangements for catchment management and governance in England. International Journal of Water Governance 3 (3):55–80. doi: 10.7564/13-IJWG26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar