441
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Practice-Based Knowledge

Land Trusts as Conservation Boundary Organizations in Rapidly Exurbanizing Landscapes: A Case Study from Southern Appalachia

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1309-1320 | Received 10 Oct 2018, Accepted 23 Nov 2019, Published online: 05 Mar 2020

References

  • Borkhataria, R. R., P. R. Wetzel, H. Henriquez, and S. E. Davis. 2017. The Synthesis of Everglades Restoration and Ecosystem Services (SERES): A case study for interactive knowledge exchange to guide Everglades restoration. Restoration Ecology 25:S18–S26. doi:10.1111/rec.12593.
  • Burke, B. J., M. Welch-Devine, S. Gustafson, N. Heynen, J. L. Rice, T. L. Gragson, S. R. Evans, and D. R. Nelson. 2016. Can science writing collectives overcome barriers to more democratic communication and collaboration? Lessons from the environmental communication praxis in Southern Appalachia. Environmental Communication 10 (2):169–86. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.999695.
  • Burkett, V., S. Ritschard, J. J. McNulty, R. O’Brien, J. Abt, U. Jones, B. Hatch, S. Murray, S. Jagtap, and J. Cruise. 2001. Potential consequences of climate variability and change for the southeastern United States. In Climate change impacts on the United States: The potential consequences of climate vulnerability and change. Report for the US Global Change Research Program, 137-166. Foundation Report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caine, K. J. 2016. Blurring the boundaries of environmentalism: The role of Canadian parks and wilderness society as a boundary organization in northern conservation planning. Rural Sociology 81 (2):194–223. doi:10.1111/ruso.12094.
  • Carr, A., and R. Wilkinson. 2005. Beyond participation: Boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact. Society & Natural Resources 18 (3):255–65. doi:10.1080/08941920590908123.
  • Cash, D. W. 2001. In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information: Agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Science Technology and Human Values 26 (4):431–53. doi:10.1177/016224390102600403.
  • Cash, D. W., and S. C. Moser. 2000. Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change 10 (2):109–20. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00017-0.
  • Chang, K. 2016. National land trust census report. https://www.landtrustalliance.org/about/national-land-trust-census (accessed July 18, 2018).
  • Cherokee One Feather. 2016. Mountain partners envisioning Nikwasi-Cowee future. https://theonefeather.com/2016/02/mountain-partners-envisioning-nikwasi-cowee-future/ (accessed September 4, 2018).
  • Cook, C. N., M. B. Mascia, M. W. Schwartz, H. P. Possingham, and R. A. Fuller. 2013. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conservation Biology 27 (4):669–78. doi:10.1111/cobi.12050.
  • Cosquer, A., R. Raymond, and A. C. Prevot-Julliard. 2012. Observations of everyday biodiversity: A new perspective for conservation? Ecology and Society 17 (4):2. doi:10.5751/ES-04955-170402.
  • Cross, J. E., C. M. Keske, M. G. Lacy, D. L. K. Hoag, and C. T. Bastian. 2011. Adoption of conservation easements among agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming: The role of economic dependence and sense of place. Landscape and Urban Planning 101 (1):75–83. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.005.
  • Delcourt, P. A., H. R. Delcourt, P. A. Cridlebaugh, and J. Chapman. 1986. Holocene ethnobotanical and paleoecological record of human impact on vegetation in the Little-Tennessee River Valley. Quaternary Research 25 (3):330–49. doi:10.1016/0033-5894(86)90005-0.
  • Dornelas, M., L. H. Antão, F. Moyes, A. E. Bates, A. E. Magurran, D. Adam, A. A. Akhmetzhanova, W. Appeltans, J. M. Arcos, H. Arnold, et al. 2018. BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27 (7):760–86. doi:10.1111/geb.12729
  • Dunsmith, G. 2017. Nikwasi: A cultural corridor highlights Cherokee culture in the mountains of North Carolina. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5af338fb55b02c9f4c61e4f2/t/5b3272a588251bbafaff95a5/1530032805436/Dunsmith_Nikwasi.pdf (accessed September 4, 2018).
  • Evans, S. R., and D. Jensen-Ryan. 2017. Exurbanization and its impact on water resources: Stream management among newcomer and generational landowners in southern Appalachia. Appalachian Journal 44 (1–2):26–50.
  • Farmer, J. R., V. Meretsky, D. Knapp, C. Chancellor, and B. C. Fischer. 2015. Why agree to a conservation easement? Understanding the decision of conservation easement granting. Landscape and Urban Planning 138:11–9. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.005.
  • Gancos-Crawford, T., C. E. Mertzlufft, S. Ortiz, J. Bloodgood, E. Guinessey, K. Brownson, H. Burnett, J. Chappell, J. Howard, L. Kosen, et al. 2014. Grade Your Stream Program Planning Guide.
  • Goldman, R. L., H. Tallis, P. Kareiva, and G. C. Daily. 2008. Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (27):9445–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800208105.
  • Gragson, T. L., and P. V. Bolstad. 2006. Land use legacies and the future of southern Appalachia. Society & Natural Resources 19 (2):175–90. doi:10.1080/08941920500394857.
  • Gustafsson, K. M., and R. Lidskog. 2018. Boundary organizations and environmental governance: Performance, institutional design, and conceptual development. Climate Risk Management 19:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2017.11.001.
  • Guston, D. H. 1999. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science 29 (1):87–111. doi:10.1177/030631299029001004.
  • Guston, D. H. 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values 26:399–408. doi:10.1177/016224390102600401.
  • Heynen, N., J. McCarthy, S. Prudham, and P. Robbins. 2007. Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kennedy, E. B. 2018. Supporting scientific advice through a boundary organization. Global Challenges 2 (9):1800018. doi:10.1002/gch2.201800018.
  • Kiesecker, J. M., T. Comendant, T. Grandmason, E. Gray, C. Hall, R. Hilsenbeck, P. Kareiva, L. Lozier, P. Naehu, A. Rissman, et al. 2007. Conservation easements in context: A quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (3):125–30. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[125:CEICAQ.2.0.CO;2]
  • Kirk, R. W., P. V. Bolstad, and S. M. Manson. 2012. Spatio-temporal trend analysis of long-term development patterns (1900–2030) in a Southern Appalachian County. Landscape and Urban Planning 104 (1):47–58. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.008.
  • Knight, R. L. 1999. Private lands: The neglected geography. Conservation Biology 13 (2):223–4.
  • Mainspring Conservation Trust. 2017. A legacy of caring for our mountains: 2017 Annual report. https://issuu.com/mainspringconservationtrust/docs/final_pdf (accessed July 18, 2018).
  • Mainspring Conservation Trust. 2018. http://www.mainspringconserves.org/what-we-do/ (accessed July 18, 2018).
  • Merenlender, A. M., L. Huntsinger, G. Guthey, and S. K. Fairfax. 2004. Land trusts and conservation easements: Who is conserving what for whom? Conservation Biology 18 (1):65–75. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00401.x.
  • Owley, J., and A. R. Rissman. 2016. Trends in private land conservation: Increasing complexity, shifting conservation purposes and allowable private land uses. Land Use Policy 51:76–84. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.026.
  • Price, K., and D. S. Leigh. 2006. Comparative water quality of lightly- and moderately-impacted streams in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 120 (1–3):269–300. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9060-1.
  • Smoky Mountain News. 2013. Land trust for the little Tennessee helps gain protection for another town watershed. February 20. http://www.smokymountainnews.com/outdoors/item/9885-land-trust-for-little-tennesseehelps-gain-protection-for-another-town-watershed
  • Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative. 1996. The Southern Appalachian assessment: Summary report. http://www.samab.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/06/SAA_summary_report.pdf (accessed July 18, 2018).
  • Spectorsky, A. C. 1955. The exurbanites. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
  • Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects – Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3):387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
  • Sternlieb, F., R. P. Bixler, H. Huber-Stearns, and C. Huayhuaca. 2013. A question of fit: Reflections on boundaries, organizations and social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management 130:117–25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.053.
  • Taylor, L. 2011. No boundaries: Exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal 76 (4):323–39. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9300-y.
  • Vercoe, R. A., M. Welch-Devine, D. Hardy, J. A. Demoss, S. N. Bonney, K. Allen, P. Brosius, D. Charles, B. Crawford, S. Heisel, et al. 2014. Acknowledging trade-offs and understanding complexity: Exurbanization issues in Macon County, North Carolina. Ecology and Society 19 (1):11. doi:10.5751/ES-05970-190123.
  • Vieites, D. R., M. Min, and D. B. Wake. 2007. Rapid diversification and dispersal during periods of global warming by Plethodontid salamanders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (50):19903–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705056104.
  • Westerink, J., R. Jongeneel, N. Polman, K. Prager, J. Franks, P. Dupraz, and E. Mettepenningen. 2017. Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management. Land Use Policy 69:176–92. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.002.
  • Wu, W., J. S. Clark, and J. M. Vose. 2014. Response of hydrology to climate change in the southern Appalachian Mountains using Bayesian inference. Hydrological Processes 28 (4):1616–26. doi:10.1002/hyp.9677.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.