What is Fair in Groundwater Allocation? Distributive and Procedural Fairness Perceptions of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act

References

• American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). 2009. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (9th edition). https://www.aapor.org/Education-Resources/For-Researchers/Poll-Survey-FAQ/Response-Rates-An-Overview.aspx (accessed June 28, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, L., G. Loewenstein, S. Issacharoff, and C. Camerer. 1995. Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. The American Economic Review 85 (5):1337–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C. 2010. Public engagement and the impact of fairness perceptions on decision favorability and acceptance. Science Communication 32 (2):256–80. doi: 10.1177/1075547009358624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. 1998. Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1):75–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Conservation. 2016. Yolo county important farmland data. https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Yolo.aspx (accessed June 27, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Water Resources (CA DWR). 2010. Agricultural land & water use estimates. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Water-Use-And-Efficiency/Land-And-Water-Use/Agricultural-Land-And-Water-Use-Estimates (accessed June 28, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Water Resources (CA DWR). 2019. SGMA groundwater management. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/SGMA-Groundwater-Management (accessed June 27, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A. W., A. D. Hole, E. Ø. Sørensen, and B. Tungodden. 2007. The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. American Economic Review 97 (3):818–27. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.3.818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., and D. Watson. 1995. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment 7 (3):309–19. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, E., T. Moran, M. DuPraw, D. Ceppos, J. Martinez, and W. Blomquist. 2018. Diverse stakeholders create collaborative, multilevel basin governance for groundwater sustainability. California Agriculture 72 (1):44–53. doi: 10.3733/ca.2018a0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., and J. W. Osborne. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 10 (7):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Daigneault, A., S. Greenhalgh, and O. Samarasinghe. 2017. Equitably slicing the pie: Water policy and allocation. Ecological Economics 131:449–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., and K. M. Schmidt. 2001. Theories of fairness and reciprocity—evidence and economic applications. Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Discussion Paper No. 2703. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=264344 (accessed on March 2, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Holland, L. M., and G. J. Doole. 2014. Implications of fairness for the design of nitrate leaching policy for heterogeneous New Zealand dairy farms. Agricultural Water Management 132:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, M., A. Milman, D. Owen, and A. Fisher. 2017. The importance of institutional design for distributed local-level governance of groundwater: The case of California’s sustainable groundwater management act. Water 9 (10):755. doi: 10.3390/w9100755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konow, J. 1996. A positive theory of economic fairness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31 (1):13–35. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00862-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konow, J. 2001. Fair and square: The four sides of distributive justice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46 (2):137–64. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00194-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, A., A. Löschel, C. Vogt, and A. Ziegler. 2010. On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations. European Economic Review 54 (3):359–75. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., and J. Freese. 2001. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lukasiewicz, A., K. Bowmer, G. J. Syme, and P. Davidson. 2013. Assessing government intentions for Australian water reform using a social justice framework. Society and Natural Resources 26 (11):1314–29. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2013.791903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., A. Curtis, E. Sharp, and E. Mendham. 2012. Directions for social research to underpin improved groundwater management. Journal of Hydrology 448-449:223–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narloch, U., U. Pascual, and A. G. Drucker. 2013. How to achieve fairness in payments for ecosystem services? Insights from agrobiodiversity conservation auctions. Land Use Policy 35:107–18. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, M. J., A. Lukasiewicz, and G. J. Syme. 2014. Why justice matters in water governance: Some ideas for a ‘water justice framework. Water Policy 16 (S2):1–18. doi: 10.2166/wp.2014.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niles, M. T., and C. R. Hammond Wagner. 2018. Farmers share their perspectives on California water management and the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. California Agriculture 72 (1):1–43. doi: 10.3733/ca.2017a0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niles, M. T., and C. R. Hammond Wagner. 2019. The carrot or the stick? Drivers of California farmer support for varying groundwater management policies. Environmental Research Communications 1 (4):045001. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ab1778.
   Google Scholar
• Niles, M. T., M. Lubell, and V. R. Haden. 2013. Perceptions and responses to climate policy risks among California farmers. Global Environmental Change 23 (6):1752–60. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3):137–58. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.3.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. 1994. A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (2):381–91. doi: 10.1086/209405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed November 20, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Ringius, L., A. Torvanger, and A. Underdal. 2002. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. International Environmental Agreements 2 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1023/A:1015041613785.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, B., B. Venables, D. M. Bates, K. Hornik, A. Gebhardt, and D. Firth. 2019. MASS: Support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley’s. Cran R. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/ (accessed June 28, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Running, K., M. Burnham, and M. V. D. Bray. 2019. Perceptions of fairness in common-pool resource access: Farmer responses to new agricultural water use restrictions in Idaho. Environmental Sociology 5 (4):405–15. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2019.1643548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Running, K., M. Burnham, C. B. Wardropper, Z. Ma, J. K. Hawes, and M. V. D. Bray. 2019. Farmer adaptation to reduced groundwater availability. Environmental Research Letters 14 (11):115010. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4ccc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, B. R., C. C. Faunt, L. Longuevergne, R. C. Reedy, W. M. Alley, V. L. McGuire, and P. B. McMahon. 2012. Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US high plains and central valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (24):9320–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200311109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. D., and M. H. McDonough. 2001. Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 14 (3):239–49. doi: 10.1080/089419201750111056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. 1997. Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Syme, G. J., and D. M. Fenton. 1993. Perceptions of equity and procedural preferences for water allocation decisions. Society and Natural Resources 6 (4):347–60. doi: 10.1080/08941929309380833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syme, G. J., B. E. Nancarrow, and J. A. McCreddin. 1999. Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. Journal of Environmental Management 57 (1):51–70. doi: 10.1006/jema.1999.0282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szeptycki, L., E. Conrad, W. Blomquist, and J. Martinez. 2017. A flexible framework or rigid doctrine: Assessing the legacy of the 2000 Mojave decision for resolving disputes over groundwater in California. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 37:185.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2017. Organic Integrity database. https://organic.ams.usda.gov/integrity/ (accessed June 27, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, L., A. S. Ward, K. Dalrymple, S. Spak, and R. Lave. 2019. An analysis of conservation practice adoption studies in agricultural human-natural systems. Journal of Environmental Management 236:490–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar