Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Scenario Elements Across Multiple Energy Scenario Studies

References

• Alcamo, J. 2008. Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, C., D. Sawyer, and N. Melton. 2015. Pathways to deep decarbonization in Canada. Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) and Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relationship (IDDRI). http://deepdecarbonization.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DDPP_CAN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, N., K. Calvin, J. Emmerling, O. Fricko, S. Fujimori, J. Hilaire, J. Eom, V. Krey, E. Kriegler, I. Mouratiadou, et al. 2017. Shared socio-economic pathways of the energy sector – quantifying the narratives. Global Environmental Change 42 (Supplement C):316–30. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N. 2019. Futures research methods and applications in natural resources. Society and Natural Resources 32 (10):1099–113. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1547852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen, P. B., and E. Trutnevyte. 2017. Ensuring diversity of national energy scenarios: Bottom-up energy system model with modeling to generate alternatives. Energy 126 (May):886–98. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.043.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., A. Hines, and T. Collins. 2007. The current state of scenario development: An overview of techniques. Foresight 9 (1):5–25. doi: 10.1108/14636680710727516.
   Google Scholar
• BP. 2019. BP statistical review of world energy 2019. London, UK: BP. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-full-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bradfield, R., G. Wright, G. Burt, G. Cairns, and K. Van Der Heijden. 2005. The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures 37 (8):795–812. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, A., K. H. Biß, H. Shamon, D. Schumann, and H. U. Heinrichs. 2018. Benefits and challenges of participatory methods in qualitative energy scenario development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 127 (February):245–57. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.026.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, I., R. Ghani, R. S. Jarmin, F. Kreuter, and J. Lane. 2016. Big data and social science: A practical guide to methods and tools. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, Jerome C., and Theodore J. Gordon, eds. 2009. Futures Research Methodology Version 3.0. Washington DC: The Millennium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2017. Pan-Canadian framework on clean growth and climate change. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/pan-canadian-framework.html.
   Google Scholar
• Guivarch, C., R. Lempert, and E. Trutnevyte. 2017. Scenario techniques for energy and environmental research: An overview of recent developments to broaden the capacity to deal with complexity and uncertainty. Environmental Modelling & Software 97 (November):201–10. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.017.
   Google Scholar
• Hagberg, A., P. Swart, and D. Schult. 2008. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkX. In Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), ed. Gäel Varoquaux, Travis Vaught, and Jarrod Millman. Pasadena, CA, USA. http://permalink.lanl.gov/object/tr?what=info:lanl-repo/lareport/LA-UR-08-05495.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, I., and O. Kerr. 2017. The Paris agreement: China’s “new normal” role in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy 17 (1):48–58. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1228521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetter, A. J., and K. Kok. 2014. Fuzzy cognitive maps for futures studies—a methodological assessment of concepts and methods. Futures 61 (September):45–57. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Jetter, A. J., and W. Schweinfort. 2011. Building scenarios with fuzzy cognitive maps: An exploratory study of solar energy. Futures 43 (1):52–66. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermagoret, C., H. Levrel, A. Carlier, and A. Ponsero. 2016. Stakeholder perceptions of offshore wind power: A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Society and Natural Resources 29 (8):916–31. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1122134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschützki, D., K. A. Lehmann, L. Peeters, S. Richter, D. Tenfelde-Podehl, and O. Zlotowski. 2005. Centrality indices. In Network analysis: Methodological foundations. Lecture notes in computer science, ed. Ulrik Brandes and Thomas Erlebach, 16–61. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-31955-9_3.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E. A., and V. J. Schweizer. 2014. Objectivity and a comparison of methodological scenario approaches for climate change research. Synthese 191 (10):2049–88. doi: 10.1007/s11229-013-0353-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLevey, J. 2014. Think tanks, funding, and the politics of policy knowledge in Canada. Canadian Revue Canadienne de Sociologie [Review of Sociology] 51 (1):54–75. doi: 10.1111/cars.12033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakicenovic, N., J. Alcamo, G. Davis, B. de Vries, J. Fenhann, S. Gaffin, K. Gregory, A. Griibler, Y.J. Tae, T. Kram, E.L. La Rovere, L. Michaelis, S. Mori, T. Morita, W. Pepper, H. Pitcher, L. Price, K. Riahi, A. Roehrl, H. Hans-Holger Rogner, A. Sankovski, M. Schlesinger, P. Shukla, S. Smith, R. Swart, S. van Rooijen, N. Victor, D. Zhou. 2000. Emissions scenarios: A special report of IPCC Working Group III. Geneva: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Energy Board (NEB). 2016. Canada’s energy future 2016: Energy supply and demand projections to 2040. Ottawa, Canada: National Energy Board, Government of Canada. https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/sttstc/ntrlgs/rprt/archive/ncnvntnlntrlgshrnrvrbsnhrnrvr2011/ncnvntnlntrlgshrnrvrbsnhrnrvr2011-fra.html.
   Google Scholar
• National Energy Board (NEB). 2018. Canada’s energy future 2018: An energy market assessment - energy supply and demand projection to 2040N. Canada: National Energy Board, Government of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho, Y., and O. Saritas. 2009. Incorporating network perspectives in foresight: A methodological proposal. Foresight 11 (6):21–41. doi: 10.1108/14636680911004948.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy, J., and P. Schwartz. 2004. Plotting your scenarios. Global Business Network. http://www.meadowlark.co/plotting_your_scenarios.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A., Jr. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, C., S. Burch, D. Layzell, J. Meadowcroft, N. Mousseau, A. Dale, I. Henriques, et al. 2016. Re-energizing Canada: Pathways to a low-carbon future. Canada: Sustainable Canada Dialoques. http://www.sustainablecanadadialogues.ca/pdf_2017/ReEnergizing_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, T. 2018. General morphological analysis as a basic scientific modelling method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 126 (January):81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.027.
   Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., G. Luderer, R. C. Pietzcker, E. Kriegler, M. Schaeffer, V. Krey, and K. Riahi. 2015. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nature Climate Change 5 (6):519–27. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohat, G., J. Flacke, H. Dao, and M. van Maarseveen. 2018. Co-use of existing scenario sets to extend and quantify the shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 151 (3–4):619–36. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2318-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounsevell, M. D. A., and M. J. Metzger. 2010. Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (4):606–19. doi: 10.1002/wcc.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele, R., N. M. Kearney, J. H. Kurniawan, and V. J. Schweizer. 2018. What scenarios are you missing? Poststructuralism for deconstructing and reconstructing organizational futures. In How Organizations Manage the Future eds. H. Krämer and M. Wenzel, 153–72. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-74506-0_8.
   Google Scholar
• Schleussner, C.-F., J. Rogelj, M. Schaeffer, T. Lissner, R. Licker, E. M. Fischer, R. Knutti, A. Levermann, K. Frieler, and W. Hare. 2016. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris agreement temperature goal. Nature Climate Change 6 (9):827–35. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer, V. J., and E. Kriegler. 2012. Improving environmental change research with systematic techniques for qualitative scenarios. Environmental Research Letters 7 (4):044011. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer, V. J., and B. C. O’Neill. 2014. Systematic construction of global socioeconomic pathways using internally consistent element combinations. Climatic Change 122 (3):431–45. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0908-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciarra, C., G. Chiarotti, F. Laio, and L. Ridolfi. 2018. A change of perspective in network centrality. Scientific Reports 8 (1):15269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33336-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon, M. 2006. Groupthink versus the wisdom of crowds: The social epistemology of deliberation and dissent. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):28–42. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00028.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K. 2016. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research and Social Science 13 (March):202–15. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddart , M. C. J., J. McLevey, V. J. Schweizer, and C. Wong. Climate Change and Energy Futures: Theoretical Frameworks, Epistemological Issues, and Methodological Perspectives. Under review by Society and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Trottier Energy Futures Project (TEFP). 2016. Canada’s challenge and opportunity: Transformation for major reductions in GHG emissions.Vancouver, Canada: Trottier Energy Futures Project.
   Google Scholar
• Trutnevyte, E., J. Barton, Á. O’Grady, D. Ogunkunle, D. Pudjianto, and E. Robertson. 2014. Linking a Storyline with Multiple Models: A Cross-Scale Study of the UK Power System Transition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89 (November):26–42. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.018.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer-Jehle, W. 2006. Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73 (4):334–61. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, A., and R. Kupers. 2014. The essence of scenarios: Learning from the shell experience. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar