Social Networks and Climate Change Policy Preferences: Structural Location and Policy Actor Support for Fossil Fuel Production

References

• Adler, E., and P. M. Haas. 1992. Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization 46 (1):367–90. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, P. S., and K. D. Everett. 1993. The structure of social protest, 1961–1983. Social Networks 15 (2):171–200. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(93)90004-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and J. C. Johnson. 2018. Analyzing social networks. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Breiger, R. L., S. A. Boorman, and P. Arabie. 1975. An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12 (3):328–83. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(75)90028-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., J. Sonnett, I. Botetzagias, M. Carson, A. Carvalho, Y. Chien, C. Edling, D. Fisher, G. Giouzepas, R. Haluza-DeLay, et al. 2016. Conflicting climate change frames in a global field of media discourse. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 2:237802311667066. doi: 10.1177/2378023116670660.
   Google Scholar
• Burck, J., F. Marten, C. Bals, N. Höhne, C. Frisch, N. Clement, and K. Szu-Chi. 2017. The Climate Change Performance Index: Results 2018. Bonn: Germanwatch, Climate Action Network International and NewClimate Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 1987. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92 (6):1287–335. doi: 10.1086/228667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 1980. Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology 6 (1):79–141. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.000455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callison, C., and D. B. Tindall. 2017. Climate change communication in Canada. In The Oxford encyclopedia of climate change communication. Online Edition, eds. M. C. Nisbet, S. S. Ho, E. Markowitz, S. O’Neill, M. S. Schäfer, and J. Thaker. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K. 2017. Canada’s carbon-capital elite: A tangled web of corporate power. Canadian Journal of Sociology 42 (3):225–60. doi: 10.29173/cjs28258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K. 2018. Who owns Canada’s fossil-fuel sector?: Mapping the Network of Ownership. Vancouver: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W., N. Graham, M. K. Lang, Z. Yunker, and K. D. McCartney. 2018. The corporate elite and the architecture of climate change denial: A network analysis of carbon Capital's Reach into Civil Society. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 55 (3):425–50. doi: 10.1111/cars.12211.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., and M. Gismondi. 2011. Challenging legitimacy at the precipice of energy calamity. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M. 2015. The cement of civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, B. H. 1988. The relational basis of attitudes. In Social structures: A network approach, eds. B. Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz, 99–121. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etemadi, M., H. A. Gorji, H. M. Kangarani, and K. Ashtarian. 2017. Power structure among the actors of financial support to the poor to access health services: Social network analysis approach. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 195:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferligoj, A., P. Doreian, and V. Batagelj. 2006. Positions and roles. In The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, eds. J. Scott and P. J. Carrington, 434–58. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., J. Waggle, and P. Leifeld. 2013. Where does political polarization come from? Locating polarization within the U.S. climate change debate. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1):70–92. doi: 10.1177/0002764212463360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartrell, C. D. 1987. Network approaches to social evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 13:49–66. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartrell, C. D. 1985. Relational and distributional models of collective justice sentiments. Social Forces 64 (1):64–83. doi: 10.2307/2578972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Published online at: https://faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/nettext/
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, A. 2014. Enough of that already: Sufficiency-based challenges to high-carbon consumption in Canada. Environmental Politics 23 (1):97–114. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.818301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoberg, G. 2013. The battle over oil sands access to tidewater: A political risk analysis of pipeline alternatives. Canadian Public Policy 39 (3):371–92. doi: 10.3138/CPP.39.3.371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huot, M., and J. Grant. 2012. Clearing the air on oilsands emissions. Calgary, Alberta: Pembina Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, K. 2011. Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal 39 (3):435–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., and M. Fischer. 2014. Drivers of collaboration to mitigate climate change: An illustration of Swiss climate policy over 15 years. Global Environmental Change 24:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasny, L., J. Waggle, and D. R. Fisher. 2015. An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks. Nature Climate Change 5 (8):782–6. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., D. Nohrstedt, C. M. Weible, and P. A. Sabatier. 2014. The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Theories of the policy process, eds. P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible, 183–224. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D. 1990. Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., and S. Yang. 2008. Social network analysis. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kolleck, N. 2016. Uncovering influence through social network analysis: The role of schools in Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education Policy 31 (3):308–29. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1119315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., S. Adam, and M. Jochum. 2006. Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (3):341–61. doi: 10.1080/13501760500528803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, A., T. Ylä‐Anttila, and J. Broadbent. 2017. Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States. Public Administration 95 (3):713–29. doi: 10.1111/padm.12321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., and D. Knoke. 1987. The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, J. E., and D. H. Anderson. 2010. ‘Cooperation gets it done’: Social capital in natural resources management along the Kaskaskia River. Society & Natural Resources 23 (3):224–39. doi: 10.1080/08941920802378897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liggio, J., S.-M. Li, R. M. Staebler, K. Hayden, A. Darlington, R. L. Mittermeier, J. O'Brien, R. McLaren, M. Wolde, D. Worthy, et al. 2019. Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods. Nature Communications 10 (1):1863 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09714-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lockie, S. 2007. Deliberation and actor-networks: The ‘practical’ implications of social theory for the assessment of large dams and other interventions. Society & Natural Resources 20 (9):785–99. doi: 10.1080/08941920701460317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., J. Scholz, R. Berardo, and G. Robins. 2012. Testing policy theory with statistical models of networks. Policy Studies Journal 40 (3):351–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00457.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil, R., and M. Paterson. 2018. Trudeau’s Canada and the challenge of decarbonisation. Environmental Politics 27 (2):379–84. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1414747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandarano, L. A. 2009. Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning. Society & Natural Resources 22 (3):245–60. doi: 10.1080/08941920801922182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matti, S., and A. Sandström. 2011. The rationale determining advocacy coalitions: Examining coordination networks and corresponding beliefs. Policy Studies Journal 39 (3):385–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00414.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., and P. Ekins. 2015. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 517 (7533):187–90. doi: 10.1038/nature14016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLevey, J. 2014. Think tanks, funding, and the politics of policy knowledge in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 51 (1):54–75. doi: 10.1111/cars.12033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A. 2010. Foundations of factor analysis. 2nd ed. London, UK: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ocelík, P., K. Svobodová, M. Hendrychová, L. Lehotský, J. Everingham, S. Ali, J. Badera, and A. Lechner. 2019. A contested transition toward a coal-free future: Advocacy coalitions and coal policy in the Czech Republic. Energy Research & Social Science 58:101283. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2009. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prell, C. 2012. Social network analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prell, C., K. Hubacek, and M. Reed. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 22 (6):501–18. doi: 10.1080/08941920802199202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiell, L, and S. Loney. 2007. Global Warming Damages and Canada's Oil Sands. Canadian Public Policy 33 (4):419–40. doi: 10.3138/cpp.33.4.419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sick, D. 2008. Social contexts and consequences of institutional change in common-pool resource management. Society & Natural Resources 21 (2):94–105. doi: 10.1080/08941920701681524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J., M. Jaccard, and N. Rivers. 2007. Hot air: Meeting Canada’s climate change challenge. Toronto, ON: Douglas Gibson Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., and J. Moody. 2013. Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: Nodes missing at random. Social Networks 35 (4):652–68. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., G. G. van de Bunt, and C. E. G. Steglich. 2010. Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks 32 (1):44–60. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, D., and E. L. Kick. 1979. Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955-1970: A multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions. American Journal of Sociology 84 (5):1096–126. doi: 10.1086/226902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotirov, M., and M. Memmler. 2012. The advocacy coalition framework in natural resource policy studies: Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics 16:51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, M. C., R. Haluza-DeLay, and D. B. Tindall. 2016. Canadian news media coverage of climate change: Historical trajectories, dominant frames, and international comparisons. Society & Natural Resources 29 (2):218–32. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1054569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, M. C. J., and D. B. Tindall. 2015. Canadian news media and the cultural dynamics of multilevel climate governance. Environmental Politics 24 (3):401–22. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1008249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindall, D. B., H. W. Harshaw, and S. R. J. Sheppard. 2010. Understanding the social bases of satisfaction with public participation in forest management decision making in British Columbia. The Forestry Chronicle 86 (6):709–22. doi: 10.5558/tfc86709-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindall, D. B., and G. Piggot. 2015. Influence of social ties to environmentalists on public climate change perceptions. Nature Climate Change 5 (6):546–9. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., and P. Cairney. Practical lessons from policy theories. Policy & Politics 46 (2):183–97. doi: 10.1332/030557318X15230059147191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 2016. The advocacy coalition framework: An approach for the comparative analysis of contentious policy issues. In Contemporary approaches to public policy, eds. B. G. Peters and P. Zittoun, 15–34. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., P. A. Sabatier, and K. McQueen. 2009. Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal 37 (1):121–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. 1988. Structural analysis: From metaphor and method to theory and substance. In Social structures: A network approach, eds. B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz, 19–61. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. C., S. A. Boorman, and R. L. Breiger. 1976. Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology 81 (4):730–80. doi: 10.1086/226141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S. E. 2009. A social innovation framework for water demand management policy: Practitioners’ capabilities, capacity, collaboration, and commitment. Society & Natural Resources 22 (5):474–83. doi: 10.1080/08941920801901343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T., A. Gronow, M. C. J. Stoddart, J. Broadbent, V. Schneider, and D. B. Tindall. 2018. Climate change policy networks: Why and how to compare them across countries. Energy Research & Social Science 45:258–65. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, N., and A. Coutinho. 2013. Government, anti-reflexivity, and the construction of public ignorance about climate change: Australia and Canada compared. Global Environmental Politics 13 (2):89–108. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar