Climate Policy and Industry Elite Perceptions of Risk and Uncertainty: A Cross-National Study

References

• Anderson, K., and A. Bows. 2011. Beyond 'dangerous' climate change: Emission scenarios for a new world. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 369 (1934):20–44. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barigazzi, J., and J. Randerson. 2018. What is Europe’s migration fight about?. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-migration-crisis-fight-explained/ (accessed December 14, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Betsill, M., and M. J. Hoffmann. 2011. The contours of “cap and trade”: The evolution of emissions trading systems for greenhouse gases. Review of Policy Research 28 (1):83–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00480.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2011. Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R., and A. McCright. 2015. Challenging climate change: The denial countermovement. In Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives, eds. R. Dunlap and R. Brulle. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1):80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 (7):739–55. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnaut, R. 2008. The Garnaut climate change review: Final report. Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilis, J. 2015. Global warming ‘hiatus’ challenged by NOAA research. New York Times. 4 June.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2010. Ignorance and surprise: Science, society and ecological design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2016. Risk as zombie category: Ulrich Beck’s unfinished project of the ‘Non-Knowledge’ society. Security Dialogue 47 (5):386–402. doi: 10.1177/0967010616645020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2017. UK climate change risk assessment 2017. London, UK: HM Government
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, eds. Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, and L. A. Meyer. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, C. C., O. Renn, E. A. Rosa, and T. Webler. 2001. Risk, uncertainty, and rational action. New York: Earthscan Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. B., and P. Slovic. 1998. Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment. Journal of Risk Research 1 (4):261–79. doi: 10.1080/136698798377042.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty, and profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H., S. Gupta, V. Bosetti, R. Cooke, V. Dutt, M. Ha-Duong, H. Held, J. Llanes-Regueiro, A. Patt, E. Shittu, and E. Weber. 2014. Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies. In Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, eds. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J. C. Minx. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyselá, E., E. Tvinnereim, and E. Ivarsflaten. 2019. Attitudes to public spending on environmental risk reduction: The role of temporal and spatial distance. Environmental Sociology 5 (4):362–73. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2019.1643528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S., and Measham, T. (2012). Social perspectives on risk and uncertainty: Reconciling the spectacular and the mundane. In Risk and Social Theory in Environmental Management, eds. T. Measham and S. Lockie. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R., and F. Bouder. 2017. Evidence-based uncertainty analysis: What should we now do in Europe? Journal of Risk Research :1–20. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1316763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, A., and P. Hannam. 2016. No 'science for science sake': Emails show CSIRO plans to cut climate research. Syndey Morning Herald, 4 April.
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, R., and S. Böhm. 2014. Ten reasons why carbon markets will not bring about radical emissions reduction. Carbon Management 5 (4):325–37. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2014.990679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrow, C., and S. Pulver. 2015. Organizations and markets. In Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives, eds. R. Dunlap and R. Brulle. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. C., A. Cath, M. Hage, E. Kunseler, and J. P. van der Sluijs. 2011. Post-normal science in practice at the netherlands environmental assessment agency. Science, Technology, & Human Values 36 (3):362–88. doi: 10.1177/0162243910385797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. 2007. Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Readfearn, G. 2014. Australia named worst-performing industrial country on climate change. The Guardian, 9 December.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2008. Concepts of risk: An interdisciplinary review. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 17 (1):50–66. doi: 10.14512/gaia.17.1.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and A. Klinke. 2012. Complexity uncertainty and ambiguity in inclusive risk governance. In Risk and social theory in environmental management, eds. S. Lockie and T. Measham, 59–76. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, E. A., O. Renn, and A. M. McCright. 2014. The risk society revisited: Social theory and governance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., and K. Williams. 2008. Elites: Remembered in capitalism and forgotten by social sciences. The Sociological Review 56 (1_suppl):1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00759.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., L. Baker, M. Martiskainen, and A. Hook. 2019. Processes of elite power and low-carbon pathways: Experimentation, financialisation, and dispossession. Global Environmental Change 59:101985. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2007. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• van Asselt, M. B. A. 2000. Perspectives on uncertainty and risk. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Sluijs, J. P. 2012. Uncertainty and dissent in climate risk assessment: A post-normal perspective. Nature and Culture 7 (2):174–95. doi: 10.3167/nc.2012.070204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volz, K., and G. Gigerenzer. 2012. Cognitive processes in decisions under risk are not the same as in decisions under uncertainty. Frontiers in Neuroscience 6:1–6. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, J. K., and G. Mythen. 2016. Risk communication: Against the gods or against all odds? Problems and prospects of accounting for black swans. Journal of Risk Research 19 (10):1220–30. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2016.1262002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C. M. L. 2018. Energy, risk and governance: The case of nuclear energy in India. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. M. L., and S. Lockie. 2018. Sociology, risk and the environment: A material-semiotic approach. Journal of Risk Research 21 (9):1077–92. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1422783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1992. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1 (3):281–304. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. 2006. Recent developments in sociology of risk and uncertainty. Historical Social Research 31:275–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. 2008. Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar