Breaking the Treadmill? Climate Change Policy Networks and the Prospects for Low Carbon Futures in Australia and Finland

References

• Ansell, C., S. Reckhow, and A. Kelly. 2009. How to reform a reform coalition: Outreach, agenda expansion, and brokerage in urban school reform. Policy Studies Journal 37 (4):717–43. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, H. A. 2016. The nexus of the coal industry and the state in Australia: Historical dimensions and contemporary challenges. Energy Policy 99:194–202. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, V. D., J. L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10):P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., and M. Di Gregorio. 2014. National REDD + policy networks: From cooperation to conflict. Ecology and Society 19 (4):14. doi:10.5751/ES-06643-190414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2000. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18 (6):727–48. doi:10.1068/c9905j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer, S. J., P. Leifeld, S. D. McClurg, and M. Rolfe. 2017. Navigating the range of statistical tools for inferential network analysis. American Journal of Political Science 61 (1):237–51. doi:10.1111/ajps.12263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K. 2013. Pricing carbon: The politics of climate policy in Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4 (6):603–13. doi:10.1002/wcc.239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEE. 2018. Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Canberra: Department of Environment and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and A. M. McCright. 2015. Challenging climate change: The denial countermovement. In Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives, eds. R. E. Dunlap and R. J. Brulle, 300–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environmental Agency). 2018. Greenhouse gas emissions per capita. København: EEA.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31 (8-9):1257–74. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germanwatch. 2019. Climate Change Performance Index 2019. https://germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/CCPI2019_Results_WEB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A., N. D. Pellow, and A. Schnaiberg. 2004. Interrogating the treadmill of production. Organization & Environment 17 (3):296–316. doi:10.1177/1086026604268747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronow, A., and T. Ylä-Anttila. 2019. Cooptation of ENGOs or treadmill of production? Advocacy coalitions and climate change policy in Finland. Policy Studies Journal 47 (4):860–81. doi:10.1111/psj.12185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronow, A., T. Ylä-Anttila, M. Carson, and C. Edling. 2019. Divergent neighbors: corporatism and climate policy networks in Finland and Sweden. Environmental Politics 28 (6):1061–83. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1625149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., and P. Sciarini. 2015. Unpacking reputational power: Intended and unintended determinants of the assessment of actors’ power. Social Networks 42:60–71. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnegan, J. 2019. Institutions, climate change, and the foundations of long-term policymaking. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 353.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, K., and L. M. Sundstrom. 2010. Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén, M. 2011. The evolution of climate policies: The role of learning and evaluations. Journal of Cleaner Production 19 (16):1798–811. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, M., Tangney, P., Reis, K. Grant-Smith D. Heazle, M. Bosomworth, K., and Burton, P.. 2015. Towards networked governance: Improving interagency communication and collaboration for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (5):757–76. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.891974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, M. 2017. Wind beneath their contempt: Why Australian policymakers oppose solar and wind energy. Energy Research & Social Science 28:11–6. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K. 2011. Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal 39 (3):435–59. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., and F. Varone. 2012. Treating policy brokers seriously: Evidence from the climate policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2):319–46. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., M. Fischer, and P. Cairney. 2017. Drivers for policy agreement in nascent subsystems: an application of the advocacy coalition framework to fracking policy in Switzerland and the UK. Policy Studies Journal 45 (3):442–63. doi:10.1111/psj.12173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R., and J. W. Meyer. 2011. Multiple levels of analysis and the limitations of methodological individualisms. Sociological Theory 29 (1):54–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01387.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., D. Nohrstedt, C. Weible, and P. Sabatier. 2014. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Ongoing Research. In Theories of the policy process, eds. P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible, 183–223. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kankare, M. 2019. Etelä-Pohjanmaalla alkaa valtava tuulivoimabuumi. Kauppalehti, 3 May, 2019. https://www.kauppalehti.fi/uutiset/etela-pohjanmaalla-alkaa-valtava-tuulivoimabuumi-kokonaisinvestointi-nousee-yli-500-miljoonaan-euroon/a2d9e8e9-bc44-4281-a244-ad0f19198417.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. 2015. The global politics of climate change: Challenge for political science. PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (1):19–26. doi:10.1017/S1049096514001541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkkänen, A. 2010. Ilmastonmuutoksen hallinnan politiikka. Kansainvälisen ilmastokysymyksen haltuunotto Suomessa. [The politics of climate change governance. The handling of the international climate question in Finland]. PhD diss., University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., F. W. Geels, F. Kern, J. Markard, E. Onsongo, A. Wieczorek, F. Alkemade, F. Avelino, A. Bergek, F. Boons, et al. 2019. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31:1–32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., S. Adam, and M. Jochum. 2006. Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (3):341–61. doi:10.1080/13501760500528803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, A., T. Ylä-Anttila, and J. Broadbent. 2017. Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States. Public Administration 95 (3):713–29. doi:10.1111/padm.12321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., and M. Paterson. 2013. Drivers of national climate policy. Climate Policy 13 (5):547–71. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.811333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. 2013. Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: A Discourse Network Analysis of German Pension Politics. Policy Studies Journal 41 (1):169–98. doi:10.1111/psj.12007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., and V. Schneider. 2012. Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):731–44. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00580.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. 2nd ed. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., M. Suter, and K. Ingold. 2016. Socio-technical transitions and policy change – Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18:215–37. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., N. Kelsey, E. Biber, and J. Zysman. 2015. Climate change. Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science (New York, N.Y.) 349 (6253):1170–1. doi:10.1126/science.aab1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., T. Sterner, and G. Wagner. 2017. Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy 2 (12):918–22. doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschitz, H., and M. Stolze. 2009. Organic farming policy networks in Europe: Context, actors and variation. Food Policy. 34 (3):258–64. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., and H. Teune. 1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological Change. In Human choice and climate change – Resources and technology (Vol. 2), eds. S. Rayner and E. L. Malone, 327–99. Columbus: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruostetsaari, I. 2010. Changing regulation and governance of Finnish energy policy making: New rules but old elites?. Review of Policy Research 27 (3):273–97. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00442.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. 1998. The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1):98–130. doi:10.1080/13501768880000051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, T. S., Sewerin S. 2017. Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nature Energy 2 (6):17084. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A. 1980. Environment: from surplus to scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A., and K. A. Gould. 1994. Environment and society: The enduring conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T. 2010. Political opportunities and storylines in Finnish climate policy negotiations. Environmental Politics 19 (2):196–216. doi:10.1080/09644010903574475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2019. Detailed GHG data from UNFCCC. Online Dataset. https://di.unfccc.int/detailed_data_by_party.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28 (12):817–30. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, P., and T. Ylä-Anttila. 2018. Who got their way? Advocacy coalitions and the Irish climate change law. Environmental Politics 27 (5):872–91. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, P., and T. Ylä-Anttila. 2020. Can policy forums overcome echo chamber effects by enabling policy learning? Evidence from the Irish climate change policy network. Journal of Public Policy 40 (2):194–211. doi:10.1017/S0143814X18000314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., K. Ingold, D. Nohrstedt, A. D. Henry, and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 2019. Sharpening advocacy coalitions. Policy Studies Journal. doi:10.1111/psj.12360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2004. Interrogating the treadmill of production: Some questions I still want to know about and am not afraid to ask. Organization & Environment 17 (3):317–22. doi:10.1177/1086026604267937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T., A. Gronow, M. C. Stoddart, J. Broadbent, V. Schneider, and D. B. Tindall. 2018. Climate change policy networks: Why and how to compare them across countries. Energy Research & Social Science 45:258–65. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S.-J., D. Ku, and J.-Y. Han. 2014. Climate policy networks in South Korea: Alliances and conflicts. Climate Policy 14 (2):283–301. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.831240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar