Climate Change and Energy Futures - Theoretical Frameworks, Epistemological Issues, and Methodological Perspectives

References

• Bach, M. 2019. The oil and gas sector: From climate laggard to climate leader? Environmental Politics 28 (1):87–103. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1521911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranzini, A., J. C. Van den Bergh, S. Carattini, R. B. Howarth, E. Padilla, and J. Roca. 2017. Carbon pricing in climate policy: Seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8 (4):e462. doi: 10.1002/wcc.462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N. 2019. Futures research methods and applications in natural resources. Society & Natural Resources 32 (10): 1099–113. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1547852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., M. Betsill, M. Hoffmann, and M. Paterson. 2010. A tale of two copenhagens: Carbon markets and climate governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (1):161–73. doi: 10.1177/0305829810372480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J., and J. C. Stephens. 2018. Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science 35:78–93. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., and M. Gismondi. 2011. Challenging Legitimacy at the Precipice of Energy Calamity. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farla, J., J. Markard, R. Raven, and L. Coenen. 2012. Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 79:991–8. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., K. Westphal, M. Bazilian, and M. Bradshaw. 2019. Model and manage the changing geopolitics of energy. Nature 569 (7754):29–31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01312-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, J. 2015. Networks in Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., and P. Pelzer. 2018. 2050 - An energetic odyssey: Understanding ‘Techniques of Futuring’ in the transition towards renewable energy. Energy Research & Social Science 44:222–31. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. 2010. The comparative politics of carbon taxation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (1):507–29. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffron, R. J., D. McCauley, and B. K. Sovacool. 2015. Resolving society’s energy trilemma through the energy justice metric. Energy Policy 87:168–76. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2018. Just transitions: A humble approach to global energy futures. Energy Research & Social Science 35 :11–4. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K., B. K. Sovacool, and D. McCauley. 2018. Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change. Energy Policy 117:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, A., T. Ylä-Anttila, P. Swarnakar, J. Broadbent, M. Lahsen, and M. C. J. Stoddart. 2018. International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and domestication of global norms: Debates on climate change in Canada, the US, Brazil, and India. Environmental Science & Policy 81:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Billon, P., and B. Kristoffersen. 2020. Just cuts for fossil fuels? Supply-side carbon constraints and energy transition. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52 (6):1072–92. doi: 10.1177/0308518X18816702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., and D. J. Hess. 2019. Incumbent resistance and the solar transition: Changing opportunity structures and framing strategies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 33 :183–95. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeQuesne, T. 2019. Petro-hegemony and the matrix of resistance: What can standing rock’s water protectors teach us about organizing for climate justice in the United States? Environmental Sociology 5 (2):188–206. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2018.1541953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, M. B., J. Markard, and D. Andersen. 2019. Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s Energy Policy Mix. Research Policy 48 :103668. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S., and C. M. L. Wong. 2017. Risk, sustainability and time: Sociological perspectives. Sustainability: Social Science Contributions :187–98.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J. 2020. The life cycle of technological innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153 :119407. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41 (6):955–67. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences 42 (4):323–40. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2016. Let’s get this transition moving! Canadian Public Policy 42 (S1):S10–S7. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2015-028.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., J. C. Stephens, E. J. Wilson, and I. H. Rowlands. 2018. Social dimensions of smart grid: Regional analysis in Canada and the United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82 :1909–12. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M. 2020. Carbon captured: How business and labor control climate politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., L. J. Nilsson, R. Hildingsson, J. Stripple, and P. O. Eikeland. 2011. The missing link: Bringing institutions and politics into energy future studies. Futures 43 (10):1117–28. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriola, T. B. 2013. Criminal resistance?: The politics of kidnapping of oil workers. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Palmater, P. 2015. Indigenous nationhood: Empowering grassroots citizens. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pulver, S. 2007. Making sense of corporate environmentalism: An environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organization & Environment 20 (1):44–83. doi: 10.1177/1086026607300246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, L. 2019. Policy perspective: Building political support for carbon pricing - lessons from cap-and-trade policies. Energy Policy 134 :110986. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D., H. Berton, and J. Meadowcroft. 2016. Framing the Sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada. Research Policy 45 (6):1275–90. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D., B. Haley, and J. Meadowcroft. 2018. Critical choices and the politics of decarbonization pathways: Exploring branching points surrounding low-carbon transitions in Canadian electricity systems. Energy Research & Social Science 37 :22–36. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D., J. Markard, F. W. Geels, and L. Fuenfschilling. 2020. Opinion: Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change-and how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (16):8664–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004093117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., M. Burke, L. Baker, C. K. Kotikalapudi, and H. Wlokas. 2017. New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice. Energy Policy 105 :677–91. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, M. C. J., P. McCurdy, N. Slawinski, and C. G. Collins. 2020. Envisioning energy futures in the North Atlantic Oil Industry: Avoidance, persistence, and transformation as responses to climate change. Energy Research & Social Science 69 :101662. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K. 2018. Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics 27 (1):21–41. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thombs, R. P. 2019. When democracy meets energy transitions: A typology of social power and energy system scale. Energy Research & Social Science 52 :159–68. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2016. What is the future? Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vasi, I. B. 2011. Winds of change: The environmental movement and the global development of the wind energy industry. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widener, P. 2018. Coastal people dispute offshore oil exploration: Toward a study of embedded seascapes, submersible knowledge, sacrifice, and marine justice. Environmental Sociology 4 (4):405–18. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2018.1441590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylä‐Anttila, T., and P. Swarnakar. 2017. Crowding-in: How Indian civil society organizations began mobilizing around climate change. The British Journal of Sociology 68 (2):273–92. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 2016. The Paris Agreement: Destined to succeed or doomed to fail? Politics and Governance 4 (3):124–32. doi: 10.17645/pag.v4i3.635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar