Locating Power in Ostrom’s Design Principles: Watershed Management in India and the United States

References

• Agrawal, A. 2002. Common resource and institutional sustainability. In The drama of the commons, eds. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber, 41–85. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akram, S., G. Emerson, and D. Marsh. 2015. (Re)conceptualising the third face of power: insights from Bourdieu and Foucault. Journal of Political Power 8 (3):345–62. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2015.1095845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. 1999. The power of feminist theory: Domination, resistance, solidarity. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F, and J. M. Wittmayer. 2016. Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5):628–49. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, J. A., A. J. Barnett, I. Perez-Ibarra, U. Brady, E. Ratajczyk, N. Rollins, C. Rubiños, H. C. Shin, D. J. Yu, R. Aggarwal, et al. 2016. Explaining success and failure in the commons: The configural nature of Ostrom's institutional design principles. International Journal of the Commons 10 (2):417–39. doi:10.18352/ijc.634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisbois, M. C., M. Morris, and R. de Loë. 2019. Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance – An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes. World Development 120:159–68. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabbell, E. J. 1980. Black invisibility and racism in Appalachia: An informal survey. Appalachian Journal 8 (1):48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. 2002. Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European Journal of Development Research 14 (2):11–30. doi:10.1080/714000425.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, F. 2010. Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: Proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences 43 (2):129–56. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J., and I. Ray. 2009. Equity reexamined: A study of community-based rainwater harvesting in Rajasthan. World Development 37 (2):435–44. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S. Villamayor-Tomas. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15 (4):38. doi:10.5751/ES-03704-150438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. K. 1961. Who governs? Power and democracy in an American city, 1st ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, V. M., and N. A. Steins. 1999. A framework for analysing contextual factors in common pool resource research. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 1 (3):205–21. doi:10.1080/714038536.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, G., A. Bennett, R. Gruby, L. Acton, and M. Nenadovic. 2014. Studying power with the social-ecological system framework. In Understanding society and natural resources, eds. M. Manfredo, J. Vaske, A. Rechkemmer, and E. Duke. 1st ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2):219–45. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, 1st ed. New York: Pantheon..
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 2019. Power and powerlessness in an Appalachian Valley – Revisited. The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (3):440–56. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1584192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 1980. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., L. Gillam, E. Barnard, P. Stewart, H. Walker, and D. Rosenthal. 2016. “We’re checking them out”: Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants’ accounts of deciding to be involved in research. International Journal for Equity in Health 15 (1):8. doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0301-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson, S. 1999. Civil rights and civic health: African American women's public health work in early twentieth-century Atlanta. National Women Studies Association Journal 11 (3):93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Kadirbeyoglu, Z., and G. Özertan. 2015. Power in the governance of common-pool resources: A comparative analysis of irrigation management decentralization in Turkey. Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (3):157–71. doi:10.1002/eet.1673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashwan, P. 2016. Integrating power in institutional analysis: A micro-foundation perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics 28 (1):5–26. doi:10.1177/0951629815586877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, V. 2019. The Indian Dalit man killed for eating in front of upper-caste men. BBC, May 19. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48,265,387
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., and S. Sen. 2013. Community responses to government defunding of watershed projects: A comparative study in India and the USA. Environmental Management 51 (3):571–85. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-0008-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. 2002. Does “participation” in common pool resource management help the poor? A social cost–benefit analysis of joint forest management in Jharkhand. World Development 30 (5):763–82. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00004-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., and B. C. Taylor. 2011. Qualitative communication research methods. 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Lukacs, H., N. M. Ardoin, and E. Grubert. 2016. Beyond formal groups: Neighboring acts and watershed protection in Appalachia. International Journal of the Commons 10 (2):878–901. doi:10.18352/ijc.578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A radical view. 2nd ed. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., and S. M. Gass. 2015. Second language research: Methodology and design. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D. 2011. Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1):51–78. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 2005. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. 2015. Going back: ‘Stalking’, talking and researcher responsibilities in qualitative longitudinal research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (3):293–305. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1017902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H., W. N. Adger, K. Brown, M. C. Lemos, D. Huitema, J. Phelps, L. Evans, P. Cohen, A. M. Song, and R. Turner. 2019. The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 57:101934. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudliar, P. 2020. Polycentric to monocentric governance: Power dynamics in Lake Victoria's fisheries. Environmental Policy and Governance. Advanced Online Publication. doi.org/10.1002/eet.1917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudliar, P., and T. M. Koontz. 2018. The muting and unmuting of caste across inter-linked action arenas: Inequality and collective action in a community-based watershed group. International Journal of the Commons 12 (1):225–48. doi.org/10.18352/ijc.807 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J. 2011. Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42 (2):153–62. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3):137–58. doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, J., D. Busquets, and S. Macbeth. 2014. Distributive justice for self-organised common-pool resource management. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 9 (3):1–39. doi:10.1145/2629567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, A., and T. Itoh. 2001. Design principles in long-enduring institutions of Japanese irrigation common-pool resources. Agricultural Water Management 48 (2):89–102. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00125-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, F. P. 2014. The promise of common pool resource theory and the reality of commons projects. International Journal of the Commons 8 (2):636–56. doi:10.18352/ijc.477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2005. Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development 6 (2):151–66. doi:10.1080/14649880500120491.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, K. 2016. Recasting the white stereotype of Southern Appalachia: Contribution to culture and community by black Appalachian women. MA Thesis, East Tennessee University. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3156.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, B. E. 2017. What’s missing from Ostrom? Combining design principles with the theory of sociocultural viability. Environmental Politics 26 (6):994–1014. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1364150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springate-Baginski, O., and P. M. Blaikie. 2007. Forests, people and power: The Political ecology of reform in South Asia. 1st ed. London: Earthscan
   Google Scholar
• Steins, N. A., and V. M. Edwards. 1999. Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources. Agriculture and Human Values 16 (3):241–55. doi:10.1023/A:1007591401621.
   Google Scholar
• Varughese, G, and E. Ostrom. 2001. The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: Some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development 29 (5):747–65. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00012-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, H. A., and D. Willer. 2014. Legitimizing collective action and countervailing power. Social Forces 92 (3):1217–39. doi:10.1093/sf/sot116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, L., and E. K. Weatherhead. 2014. An integrated approach to analyzing (adaptive) co-management using the ‘Politicized’ IAD Framework. Ecology and Society 19 (1):10. doi:10.5751/ES-06177-190110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, I. 2020. Caste: The origins of our discontents. 1st ed. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G., and S. Nandigama. 2018. Managing political space: Authority, marginalised people’s agency and governance in West Bengal. International Development Planning Review 40 (1):1–26. doi:10.3828/idpr.2018.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2015. Qualitative research from start to finish. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar