Place-Based Identities of Landowners: Implications for Wildlife Conservation

References

• Balukas, J. A., K. P. Bell, and D. M. Bauer. 2019. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 232:751–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, J. C., and A. J. Martin. 1988. Identity and private forest management. Society & Natural Resources 1 (1):365–76. doi: 10.1080/08941928809380666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, L. A., W. P. Kuvlesky, and M. Morrison. 2005. Invited paper: North American grassland birds: An unfolding conservation crisis? Journal of Wildlife Management 69 (1):1–13. doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0001:NAGBAU > 2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., and R. M. Kramer. 1986. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (3):543–9. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., and D. C. Reitzes. 1991. An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly 54 (3):239–51. doi: 10.2307/2786653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., and J. E. Stets. 2009. Identity theory. Oxford, England, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charrad, M., N. Ghazzali, V. Boiteau, A. Niknafs, and M. M. Charrad. 2014. Package ‘NbClust. Journal of Statistical Software 61 (6):1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v061.i06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, S. S., D. T. Cobb, P. T. Bromley, and C. E. Sorenson. 2004. Landowner attitudes regarding wildlife management on private land in North Carolina. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32 (1):209–19. doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[209:LARWMO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayer, A. A., S. B. Allred, and R. C. Stedman. 2014. Comparative analysis and assessment of forest landowner typologies. Society & Natural Resources 27 (11):1200–12. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.933931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Drechsler, M., F. Wätzold, K. Johst, and J. F. Shogren. 2010. An agglomeration payment for cost-effective biodiversity conservation in spatially structured landscapes. Resource and Energy Economics 32 (2):261–75. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. 1964. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6 (3):241–52. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A., J. Miles, and Z. Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ferranto, S., L. Huntsinger, C. Getz, M. Lahiff, W. Stewart, G. Nakamura, and M. Kelly. 2013. Management without borders? A survey of landowner practices and attitudes toward cross-boundary cooperation. Society & Natural Resources 26 (9):1082–100. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2013.779343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhlendorf, S., D. Engle, K. Jay, and H. Robert. 2009. Pyric herbivory: Rewilding landscapes through the recoupling of fire and grazing. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 23 (3):588–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01139.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhlendorf, S. D., W. C. Harrell, D. M. Engle, R. G. Hamilton, C. A. Davis, and D. M. Leslie. 2006. Should heterogeneity be the basis for conservation? Grassland bird response to fire and grazing. Ecological Applications: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America 16 (5):1706–16. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1706:SHBTBF]2.0.CO;2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhlendorf, S. D., T. J. Hovick, R. D. Elmore, A. M. Tanner, D. M. Engle, and C. A. Davis. 2017. A hierarchical perspective to woody plant encroachment for conservation of prairie-chickens. Rangeland Ecology & Management 70 (1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2016.08.010.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, N., P. Klepeis, and L. Chisholm. 2010. Stewardship among lifestyle oriented rural landowners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (3):317–34. doi: 10.1080/09640561003612890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, E., and K. J. Williams. 2010. Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (3):298–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., J. H. Haggerty, and P. A. Byorth. 2007. Ranch ownership change and new approaches to water resource management in Southwestern Montana: Implications for fisheries1. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43 (4):990–1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00081.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., and W. R. Travis. 2005. Ranchland ownership dynamics in the Rocky Mountain West. Rangeland Ecology & Management 58 (2):191–8. doi: 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58<191:RODITR>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, G.,. S. Bryce, J. Omernik, and A. Rogers. 2007. Ecoregions of Texas. Corvallis, OR: Texas Department of Environmental Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, T. M., A. Curtis, E. Mendham, and E. Toman. 2017. Examining the agricultural producer identity: Utilising the collective occupational identity construct to create a typology and profile of rural landholders in Victoria. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (4):628–46. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1165189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C., and E. T. Game. 2016. Conservation planning: Informed decisions for a healthier planet. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gruver, J. B., A. L. Metcalf, A. B. Muth, J. C. Finley, and A. E. Luloff. 2017. Making decisions about forestland succession: Perspectives from Pennsylvania’s Private Forest Landowners. Society & Natural Resources 30 (1):47–62. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1180728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, B., M. C. Hidalgo, M. E. Salazar-Laplace, and S. Hess. 2007. Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (4):310–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., and S. A. Reid. 2006. Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory 16 (1):7–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, K. F., C. P. Ramsdell, and M. G. Sorice. 2017. A life course approach to understanding social drivers of rangeland conversion. Ecology and Society 22 (1):19. doi: 10.5751/ES-08990-220119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Renewable Natural Resources (IRNR). 2014. Texas Land Trends. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Jansujwicz, J. S., A. J. K. Calhoun, J. E. Leahy, and R. J. Lilieholm. 2013. Using mixed methods to develop a frame-based private landowner typology. Society & Natural Resources 26 (8):945–61. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.729294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendra, A., and R. B. Hull. 2005. Motivations and behaviors of New Forest Owners in Virginia. Forest Science 51:142–54. doi: 10.1093/FORESTSCIENCE/51.2.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, L. R., G. E. Garrard, S. A. Bekessy, M. Mills, A. R. Camilleri, F. Fidler, K. S. Fielding, A. Gordon, E. A. Gregg, A. M. Kusmanoff, et al. 2019. Messaging matters: A systematic review of the conservation messaging literature. Biological Conservation 236:92–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, U. P., D. W. Wolfe, K. B. Hays, and J. R. Conner. 2017. Conservation credits: Evolution of a market-oriented approach to recovery of species of concern on private land. Rangeland Ecology & Management 70 (3):264–72. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2016.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, P. H., and U. P. Kreuter. 2012. Examining the direct and indirect effects of environmental change and place attachment on land management decisions in the Hill Country of Texas, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning 104 (3–4):320–8. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langpap, C. 2004. Conservation incentives programs for endangered species: An analysis of landowner participation. Land Economics 80 (3):375–88. doi: 10.2307/3654727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. 1949. A sand county almanac: With other essays on conservation from Round River. Oxford, England, U.K.: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lind-Riehl, J., S. Jeltema, M. Morrison, G. Shirkey, A. L. Mayer, M. Rouleau, and R. Winkler. 2015. Family legacies and community networks shape private forest management in the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan (USA). Land Use Policy 45:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokocz, E., R. L. Ryan, and A. J. Sadler. 2011. Motivations for land protection and stewardship: Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning 99 (2):65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, I., D. Laband, L. Teeter, and B. Butler. 2009. Motivations and land-use intentions of nonindustrial private forest landowners: Comparing inheritors to noninheritors. Forest Science 55:423–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, I., L. Teeter, and B. Butler. 2008. Characterizing family forest owners: A cluster analysis approach. Forest Science 54:176–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, B. P., and J. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach, OR: MJM Software Design.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, J., L. W. Morton, and A. D. Cast. 2013. Reconstructing the good farmer identity: Shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1):57–69. doi: 10.1007/s10460-012-9381-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, J. M., L. W. Morton, J. G. Arbuckle, Jr., and A. D. Cast. 2015. Farmer identities and responses to the social–biophysical environment. Journal of Rural Studies 39:145–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. 2010. Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (1):11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, R., A. Hamilton-Webb, R. Little, and D. Maye. 2018. The ‘good farmer’: Farmer identities and the control of exotic livestock disease in England. Sociologia Ruralis 58 (1):3–19. doi: 10.1111/soru.12127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noss, R. F., and J. M. Scott. 1995. Endangered ecosystems of the United States: A preliminary assessment of loss and degradation (Vol. 28). Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.
   Google Scholar
• Olenick, K. L., U. P. Kreuter, and J. R. Conner. 2005. Texas landowner perceptions regarding eco-system services and cost-share land management programs. Ecological Economics 53 (2):247–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini, S. 2013. Explaining land management decisions to understand local landscape functions and change. Some insights from Tuscany. Local Environment 18 (8):934–49. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.748726.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, L. G., and E. Sharp. 2008. Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 49 (3):210–7. doi: 10.1037/a0012755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrzelka, P.,. S. Malin, and B. Gentry. 2012. Absentee landowners and conservation programs: Mind the gap. Land Use Policy 29 (1):220–3. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J., L. S. Kristensen, and A. G. Busck. 2013. The farmer and landscape management: Different roles, different policy approaches. Geography Compass 7 (4):300–14. doi:10.1111/gec3.12040.
   Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J., and L. S. Kristensen. 2011. The farmer as a landscape manager: Management roles and change patterns in a Danish region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 111 (2):107–16. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2011.10669527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokopy, L. S., K. Floress, J. G. Arbuckle, S. P. Church, F. R. Eanes, Y. Gao, B. M. Gramig, P. Ranjan, and A. S. Singh. 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74 (5):520–34. doi: 10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzitis, G. 1999. Amenities increasingly draw people to the Rural West. Rural America/Rural Development Perspectives 14 (2221-2019-2682):9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. 2002. Knowledge, information, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures, 67–82. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. M., F. W. Davis, R. G. McGhie, R. G. Wright, C. Groves, and J. Estes. 2001. Nature reserves: Do they capture the full range of America’s. Biological Diversity? Ecological Applications 11 (4):999–1007. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0999:NRDTCT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeins, F. E., D. D. Diamond, and C. W. Hanselka. 1992. Coastal prairie. Ecosystems of the World 8:269–90.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. B., S. Kark, C. J. Schneider, R. K. Wayne, and C. Moritz. 2001. Biodiversity hotspots and beyond: The need for preserving environmental transitions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16 (8):431. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02201-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorice, M. G., U. P. Kreuter, B. P. Wilcox, and W. E. Fox. 2014. Changing landowners, changing ecosystem? Land-ownership motivations as drivers of land management practices. Journal of Environmental Management 133:144–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorice, M. G., J. R. Conner, U. P. Kreuter, and R. N. Wilkins. 2012a. Centrality of the ranching lifestyle and attitudes toward a voluntary incentive program to protect endangered species. Rangeland Ecology & Management 65 (2):144–52. doi: 10.2111/REM-D-10-00144.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorice, M. G., U. P. Kreuter, B. P. Wilcox, and W. E. Fox. 2012b. Classifying land-ownership motivations in central, Texas, USA: A first step in understanding drivers of large-scale land cover change. Journal of Arid Environments 80:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., and P. J. Burke. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (3):224. doi: 10.2307/2695870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E. 2018. Identity theory. In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories.ed. Burke, P.J., 2nd ed., 81–111. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Surendra, G. C., S. Mehmood, and J. Schelhas. 2009. Segmenting landowners based on their information-seeking behavior: A look at landowner education on the Red Oak Borer. Journal of Forestry 107:313–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, K. M., D. G. Brown, G. D. Deane, and R. N. Kornak. 2013. Land transitions in the American plains: Multilevel modeling of drivers of grassland conversion (1950 to 2000). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 168:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.01.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidwell, M. V. 2005. A social identity model of prosocial behaviors within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 15 (4):449–67. doi: 10.1002/nml.82.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD). 2010. Wildlife management activities and practices: Comprehensive Wildlife management and planning guidelines for the gulf coast prairie and marshes ecoregion. Austin, TX: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
   Google Scholar
• The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 2002. The Gulf Coast prairies and marshes ecoregional conservation plan. San Antonio, TX: Gulf Coast Prairies and Marshes Ecoregional Planning Team.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich-Schad, J. D., N. Babin, Z. Ma, and L. S. Prokopy. 2016. Out-of-state, out of mind? Non-operating farmland owners and conservation decision making. Land Use Policy 54:602–13. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Attwater’s prairie-chicken recovery plan: Second Revision. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., and K. C. Kobrin. 2001. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education 32 (4):16–21. doi: 10.1080/00958960109598658.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. K., F. S. Guthery, R. D. Applegate, and M. J. Peterson. 2004. The northern bobwhite decline: Scaling our management for the twenty-first century. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32 (3):861–9. doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032<0861:TNBDSO>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• With, K. A., A. W. King, and W. E. Jensen. 2008. Remaining large grasslands may not be sufficient to prevent grassland bird declines. Biological Conservation 141 (12):3152–67. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C. K., and M. C. Wimberly. 2013. Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (10):4134–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215404110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar