Effects of Message Framing on Public Responses to Using Genetic Engineering to Restore American Chestnut Trees

References

• Allum, N., P. Sturgis, D. Tabourazi, and I. Brunton-Smith. 2008. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science 17 (1):35–54. doi:10.1177/0963662506070159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J., and S. Rains. 2010. A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs 77 (3):281–311. doi:10.1080/03637751003758193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M., and J. Boykoff. 2004. Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change 14 (2):125–36. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, D., J. Long, T. Loraas, J. Mueller-Phillips, and B. Vansant. 2014. Online instrument delivery and participant recruitment services: Emerging opportunities for behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting 26 (1):1–23. doi:10.2308/bria-50651.
   Google Scholar
• Cesario, J., H. Grant, and E. Higgins. 2004. Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (3):388–404. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. 2014. Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (Supplement_4):13614–20. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320645111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, A., S. Yantis, M. Norwood, and D. Montano. 1985. Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (5):1184–98. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. 1993. Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4):51–8. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. 1986. How do attitudes guide behavior? In Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, eds. R. Sorrentino and E. Higgins, 204–43. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., A. R. H. Fischer, M. Brennan, D. Bánáti, R. Lion, R. M. Meertens, G. Rowe, M. Siegrist, W. Verbeke, and C. M. J. L. Vereijken. 2016. Risk/benefit communication about food-A systematic review of the literature. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56 (10):1728–45. doi:10.1080/10408398.2013.801337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L., C. Howard, and R. Shepherd. 1998. The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production. Agriculture and Human Values 15 (1):15–30. doi:10.1023/A:1007465730039.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L., S. Miles, and R. Marsh. 2002. The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis 22 (4):701–11. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. 2006. Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication 56 (suppl_1):S163–S183. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjar, R., and R. Kozak. 2015. Exploring public perceptions of forest adaptation strategies in Western Canada: Implications for policy-makers. Forest Policy and Economics 61:59–69. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjar, R., E. McGuigan, M. Moshofsky, and R. Kozak. 2014. Opinions on strategies for forest adaptation to future climate conditions in Western Canada: Surveys of the general public and leaders of forest-dependent communities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44 (12):1525–33. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0142.
   Google Scholar
• Hallman, W., W. Hebden, H. Aquino, C. Cuite, and J. Lang. 2003. Public perceptions of genetically modified foods: A national study of American knowledge and opinion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. 2000. Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist 55 (11):1217–30. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, L., and J. Krosnick. 2017. Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology 68:327–51. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, P., and I. Arakelyan. 2017a. Exploring public perceptions of solutions to tree diseases in the UK: Implications for policy-makers. Environmental Science & Policy 76:70–7. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, P., and I. Arakelyan. 2017b. Developing publicly acceptable tree health policy: Public perceptions of tree-breeding solutions to ash dieback among interested publics in the UK. Forest Policy and Economics 80:167–77. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. 2012. Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk. In Handbook of risk theory: Epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk, eds. S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, and M. Peterson, 725–59. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D., D. Braman, P. Slovic, J. Gastil, and G. Cohen. 2009. Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2):87–90. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D., H. Jenkins-Smith, and D. Braman. 2011. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14 (2):147–74. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2):263–92. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 8 (2):177–87. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazana, V., L. Tsourgiannis, V. Iakovoglou, C. Stamatiou, A. Alexandrov, S. Araújo, S. Bogdan, G. Bozic, R. Brus, G. Bossinger, et al. 2016. Public attitudes towards the use of transgenic forest trees: A cross-country pilot survey. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 9 (2):344–53. doi:10.3832/ifor1441-008.
   Google Scholar
• Kempken, F., and C. Jung. 2010. Genetic modification of plants: Agriculture, horticulture and forestry. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klerck, D., and J. Sweeney. 2007. The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology and Marketing 24 (2):171–93. doi:10.1002/mar.20157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., G. Gignac, and S. Vaughan. 2013. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change 3 (4):399–404. doi:10.1038/nclimate1720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., W. Siemer, M. Baumer, and D. Decker. 2018. Exploring the role of gain versus loss framing and point of reference in messages to reduce human-bear conflicts. The Social Science Journal 55 (2):182–92. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2017.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J., L. House, C. Valli, S. Jaeger, M. Moore, J. Morrow, and W. Traill. 2004. Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: Evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France. European Review of Agriculture Economics 31 (2):179–204. doi:10.1093/erae/31.2.179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., and J. Meyers-Levy. 1990. The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research 27 (3):361–7. doi:10.2307/3172593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, B., and J. Lusk. 2015. Cognitive biases in the assimilation of scientific information on global warming and genetically modified food. Food Policy 54:35–43. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhetres, J., B. Rutjens, N. Weinstein, and J. Brisson. 2019. Modifying attitudes about modified foods: Increased knowledge leads to more positive attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 64:21–9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. 2009. The influence of source credibility on attitude certainty: Exploring the moderating effects of timing of source identification and individual need for cognition. Psychology and Marketing 26 (4):321–32. doi:10.1002/mar.20275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2016. Genetically engineered crops: Experiences and prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2019. Forest health and biotechnology: Possibilities and considerations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonić, M., U. Radojević, J. Milovanović, M. Perović, and M. Šijačić-Nikolić. 2015. Comparative analysis of students’ attitudes toward implementation of genetically modified trees in Serbia. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 8 (5):714–8. doi:10.3832/ifor1305-007.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson St-Laurent, G., S. Hagerman, and R. Kozak. 2018. What risks matter? Public views about assisted migration and other climate-adaptive reforestation strategies. Climatic Change 151 (3–4):573–87. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2310-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, J., M. Needham, and G. Howe. 2021a. Cognitive and demographic drivers of attitudes toward using genetic engineering to restore American chestnut trees. Forest Policy and Economics 125:102385. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, J., M. Needham, and G. Howe. 2021b. Trust, perceptions of risks and benefits, and normative acceptance of approaches for restoring American chestnut trees. Risk Analysis. doi:10.1111/risa.13766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R., and J. Cacioppo. 1984. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1):69–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R., and J. Cacioppo. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19:123–205. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. 2016. New genetically engineered American chestnut will help restore the decimated, iconic tree. The Conversation, January 19.
   Google Scholar
• Rousu, M., W. Huffman, J. Shogren, and A. Tegene. 2007. Effects and value of verifiable information in a controversial market: Evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified food. Economic Inquiry 45 (3):409–32. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00017.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., Y. Inbar, C. Wirz, D. Brossard, and P. Rozin. 2018. An overview of attitudes toward genetically engineered food. Annual Review of Nutrition 38:459–79. doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-051223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., and D. Rouner. 2002. Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory 12 (2):173–91. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R., N. Connelly, T. Heberlein, D. Decker, and S. Allred. 2019. The end of the (research) world as we know it? Understanding and coping with declining response rates to mail surveys. Society & Natural Resources 32 (10):1139–54. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1587127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teel, T., A. Bright, M. Manfredo, and J. Brooks. 2006. Evidence of biased processing of natural resource-related information: A study of attitudes toward drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Society & Natural Resources 19 (5):447–63. doi:10.1080/08941920600561140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4):1039–61. doi:10.2307/2937956.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. 2019. Survey research and analysis. Urbana, IL: Sagamore/Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., N. Rhodes, and M. Biek. 1995. Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, eds. R. Petty and J. Krosnick, 283–314. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wuepper, D., P. Wree, and G. Ardali. 2019. Does information change German consumers’ attitudes about genetically modified food? European Review of Agricultural Economics 46 (1):53–78. doi:10.1093/erae/jby018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., A. Oakes, A. Newhouse, K. Baier, C. Maynard, and W. Powell. 2013. A threshold level of oxalate oxidase transgene expression reduces Cryphonectria parasitica-induced necrosis in a transgenic American chestnut (Castanea dentata) leaf bioassay. Transgenic Research 22 (5):973–82. doi:10.1007/s11248-013-9708-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuwerink-Jacks, J., and K. Cameron. 2003. Strategies for resisting persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 25 (2):145–61. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar