Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Relation to Kauri Dieback: When Place Attachment Is Not Enough

References

• Auckland Council. 2017. Kauri dieback report 2017 – The kauri dieback programme. https://www.kauriprotection.co.nz/media/1516/7-auckland-council-waitakere-ranges-report-v2-final-aug17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ballew, M. T., A. R. Pearson, M. H. Goldberg, S. A. Rosenthal, and A. Leiserowitz. 2020. Does socioeconomic status moderate the political divide on climate change? The roles of education, income, and individualism. Global Environmental Change 60:102024. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, D., and D. A. Schwartz. 2016. Miley, CNN and The Onion. When fake news becomes realer than real. Journalism Practice 10 (1):1–17. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2015.1006933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., and J. W. Brehm. 1981. Psychological reactance. A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., and B. L. Ley. 2013. Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication 35 (1):115–37. doi: 10.1177/1075547012441691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. J., G. N. Wallace, and D. R. Williams. 2007. Is this a one-night stand or the start of something meaningful? Developing relationships to place in National Park Backcountry. Science and Stewardship to Protect and Sustain Wilderness Values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium, Fort Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Byerly, H., A. Balmford, P. J. Ferraro, C. Hammond Wagner, E. Palchak, S. Polasky, T. H. Ricketts, A. J. Schwartz, and B. Fisher. 2018. Nudging pro-environmental behavior: Evidence and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16 (3):159–68. doi: 10.1002/fee.1777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, H.-W. 2020. When do values promote pro-environmental behaviors? Multilevel evidence on the self-expression hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 71:101361. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., M. J. Benus, and J. Hernandez. 2019. Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. Science Education 103 (5):1235–76. doi: 10.1002/sce.21527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., A. Berthold, and M. Siegrist. 2022. Knowledge, perceived potential and trust as determinants of low- and high-impact pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology 79:101741. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, G. T., and P. L. Winter. 2003. Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species. Environment and Behavior 35 (2):286–307. doi: 10.1177/0013916502250139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daryanto, A., and Z. Song. 2021. A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Business Research 123:208–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation. 2021. Kauri. Native Plants. Nature. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/native-plants/kauri/ (accessed August 15, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Dorow, M., and R. Arlinghaus. 2012. The relationship between personal commitment to angling and the opinions and attitudes of German anglers towards the conservation and management of the European Eel Anguilla anguilla. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32 (3):466–79. doi: 10.1080/02755947.2012.680006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, B. C., S. Coulombe, S. Whitney, M. Riemer, and D. Labbé. 2018. Beyond exposure to outdoor nature: Exploration of the benefits of a green building’s indoor environment on wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology 9:1583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open 4 (1):2158244014522633. doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiar, K., J. Pearce, R. Dowling, and E. Goh. 2022. Pro-environmental behaviours in protected areas: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Tourism Management Perspectives 41:100943. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, J., F. G. Kaiser, and M. Wilson. 2004. Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences 37 (8):1597–1613. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, S. M., M. Geiger, and O. Wilhelm. 2019. Environment-specific vs. general knowledge and their role in pro-environmental behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology 10:718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, C., and K. Roelich. 2021. Psychological barriers to pro-environmental behaviour change: A review of meat consumption behaviours. Sustainability 13 (21):11582. doi: 10.3390/su132111582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., and D. T. Ogden. 2009. To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26 (6):376–391. doi: 10.1108/07363760910988201.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, B., A. M. Martín, C. Ruiz, and M. d C. Hidalgo. 2010. The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (3):281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hueneke, H., and R. Baker. 2009. Tourist behaviour, local values, and interpretation at Uluru: ‘The sacred deed at Australia’s mighty heart’. GeoJournal 74 (5):477–490. doi: 10.1007/s10708-008-9249-2.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, K., and N. Berigan. 2013. Trust, culture, and cooperation: A social dilemma analysis of pro-environmental behaviors. The Sociological Quarterly 54 (3):424–449. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaaronen, R. O. 2017. Affording sustainability: Adopting a theory of affordances as a guiding heuristic for environmental policy. Frontiers in Psychology 8:1974–1974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., D. Golding, and S. Tuler. 1992. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues 48 (4):161–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8 (3):239–260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, S., N. Waipara, A. Black, M. Mark-Shadbolt, and W. Wood. 2018. Indigenous biosecurity: Māori responses to kauri dieback and myrtle rust in Aotearoa New Zealand. In The human dimensions of forest and tree health: Global perspectives, eds. Julie Urquhart, Mariella Marzano, and Clive Potter, 109–37. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., J. W. Whiting, and G. T. Green. 2011. Exploring the influence of outdoor recreation participation on pro-environmental behaviour in a demographically diverse population. Local Environment 16 (1):67–86. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2010.548373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-K., M.-S. Kim, T. Katz-Gerro, and Y. Kim. 2019. Personal values, perceived consumer effectiveness and demographic effects on green purchasing behavior of Korean consumers. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 18 (2):349–358. doi: 10.30638/eemj.2019.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, N., S. Rosenthal, P. Sörqvist, and S. Barthel. 2021. Internal and external factors’ influence on recycling: Insights from a laboratory experiment with observed behavior. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (3090):699410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linder, N., T. Lindahl, and S. Borgström. 2018. Using behavioural insights to promote food waste recycling in urban households—Evidence from a longitudinal field experiment. Frontiers in Psychology 9:352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater, W. L., M. J. Farnworth, Y. Heezik, K. J. Stafford, and E. A. MacDonald. 2019. Prioritizing cat-owner behaviors for a campaign to reduce wildlife depredation. Conservation Science and Practice 1 (5):e29. doi: 10.1111/csp2.29.
   Google Scholar
• MacBride-Stewart, S. 2019. Discourses of wellbeing and environmental impact of trail runners in protected areas in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Geoforum 107:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, C. M. L., and M. T. Schmitt. 2019. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 65:101323. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. 2018. Thousands snubbing Waitakere Ranges rahui despite reminders by park rangers. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/thousands-snubbing-waitakere-ranges-rahui-despite-reminders-by-park-rangers/52WXOVGBXA6D24T452U45L4JWY/
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, R. M., N. M. Ardoin, C. B. Wharton, and F. K. Brewer. 2017. Civic and natural place attachment as correlates of resident invasive species control behavior in Hawaii. Biological Conservation 209:415–422. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovenden, K. 2020. Kauri dieback track user study 2020. Auckland: Auckland Council. https://knowledgeauckland.org.nz/media/1951/tr2020-020-kauri-dieback-track-user-study-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Please, P. M., D. W. Hine, P. Skoien, K. L. Phillips, and I. Jamieson. 2018. Prioritizing community behaviors to improve wild dog management in peri-urban areas. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 23 (1):39–53. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2017.1385877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinbeck, G., D. Lach, and S. Chan. 2011. Exploring stakeholders’ attitudes and beliefs regarding behaviors that prevent the spread of invasive species. Environmental Education Research 17 (3):341–352. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2010.542451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon, H., G. L. D. Smith, and B. Weiler. 2013a. Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach. Tourism Management 36:552–566. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon, H., L. D. G. Smith, and B. Weiler. 2013b. Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian National Park. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21 (3):434–457. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2012.708042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A. 2019. Increasing anger over Waitakere-track closures. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/increasing-anger-over-waitakere-track-closures
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. 2011. Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology 25 (6):1080–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01766.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D., T. L. Milfont, and H. Hilton. 2019. The interplay between intrinsic motivation, financial incentives and nudges in sustainable consumption. In A research agenda for economic psychology, eds. Katharina Gangl and Erich Kirchler, 87–103. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Segev, S. 2015. Modelling household conservation behaviour among ethnic consumers: The path from values to behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39 (3):193–202. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. 2021. Trust and risk perception: A critical review of the literature. Risk Analysis 41 (3):480–490. doi: 10.1111/risa.13325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. 2018. Titirangi South.
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., and C. Vlek. 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29 (3):309–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, N. M., S. S. M. Townsend, and A. G. Dittmann. 2019. Social-class disparities in higher education and professional workplaces: The role of cultural mismatch. Current Directions in Psychological Science 28 (1):67–73. doi: 10.1177/0963721418806506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3):407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, G. A., and A. E. Beveridge. 2010. A review of New Zealand kauri (Agathis australis (D.Don) Lindl.): Its ecology, history, growth and potential for management for timber. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 40: 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tokalau, T. 2020. Waitākere Ranges tracks closed to stop kauri dieback spread vandalised. https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/118882211/waitkere-ranges-tracks-closed-to-stop-kauri-dieback-spread-vandalised
   Google Scholar
• Truelove, H. B., and C. Parks. 2012. Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32 (3):246–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, J., C. Potter, J. Barnett, J. Fellenor, J. Mumford, C. P. Quine, and H. Bayliss. 2017. Awareness, concern and willingness to adopt biosecure behaviours: Public perceptions of invasive tree pests and pathogens in the UK. Biological Invasions 19 (9):2567–2582. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1467-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M. 2009. Averting the tragedy of the commons: Using social psychological science to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (3):169–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01630.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waight, C. F., and A. J. Bath. 2014. Recreation specialization among ATV users and its relationship to environmental attitudes and management preferences on the Island of Newfoundland. Leisure Sciences 36 (2):161–182. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2013.862887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waipara, N., S. Hill, L. Hill, E. Hough, and I. Horner. 2013. Surveillance methods to determine tree health distribution of kauri dieback disease and associated pathogens. New Zealand Plant Protection 66:235–241. doi: 10.30843/nzpp.2013.66.5671.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, L. 2017. Govt gets tough to save kauri. Nelson Mail, December 22.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, S. 2015. Factors influencing forest visitor responses to biosecurity control measures. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Science University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Wynveen, C. J., and S. G. Sutton. 2015. Engaging the public in climate change-related pro-environmental behaviors to protect coral reefs: The role of public trust in the management agency. Marine Policy 53:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynveen, C. J., G. T. Kyle, and S. G. Sutton. 2010. Place meanings ascribed to marine settings: The case of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Leisure Sciences 32 (3):270–287. doi: 10.1080/01490401003712705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., X. Xiao, R. Cao, C. Zheng, Y. Guo, W. Gong, and Z. Wei. 2020. How important is community participation to eco-environmental conservation in protected areas? From the perspective of predicting locals’ pro-environmental behaviours. The Science of the Total Environment 739:139889. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar