Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 36, 2023 - Issue 4
782
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comments & Rejoinders

Conference of the Parties Meetings as Regularly Scheduled Critical Events for Global Climate Governance: Reflecting on COP 26 and the Glasgow Climate Pact

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 442-450 | Received 06 Jun 2022, Accepted 25 Jan 2023, Published online: 03 Feb 2023

References

  • Allan, J. I. 2019. Dangerous incrementalism of the Paris Agreement. Global Environmental Politics 19 (1):4–11. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00488.
  • Allan, J. I., C. B. Roger, T. N. Hale, S. Bernstein, Y. Tiberghien, and R. Balme. 2021. Making the Paris Agreement: Historical processes and the drivers of institutional design. Political Studies. doi: 10.1177/00323217211049294.
  • Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bäckstrand, K., J. W. Kuyper, B.-O. Linnér, and E. Lövbrand. 2017. Non-state actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics 26 (4):561–79. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485.
  • Blühdorn, I. 2011. The politics of unsustainability: COP15, post-ecologism, and the ecological paradox. Organization & Environment 24 (1):34–53. doi: 10.1177/1086026611402008.
  • Carter, A. V., and J. McKenzie. 2020. Amplifying “keep it in the ground” first-movers: Toward a comparative framework. Society & Natural Resources 33 (11):1339–58. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2020.1772924.
  • Chan, S., T. Hale, A. Deneault, M. Shrivastava, K. Mbeva, V. Chengo, and J. Atela. 2022. Assessing the effectiveness of orchestrated climate action from 5-years of summits. Nature Climate Change 12 (7):628–33. doi: 10.1038/s41558-022-01405-6.
  • Death, C. 2012. A predictable disaster for the climate – But who else won and lost in Durban at COP17? Environmental Politics 21 (6):980–6. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.705067.
  • Feld, S. L. 1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 86 (5):1015–35. doi: 10.1086/227352.
  • Harris, P. G. 2022. COP26: The eternally weak pulse of climate diplomacy, and what needs to change. PLoS Climate 1 (3):e0000019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000019.
  • Green, J. 2022. The climate establishment. Unpublished paper.
  • Keohane, R. 1982. The demand for international regimes. International Organizations 32:325–55.
  • Keohane, R. O., and D. G. Victor. 2011. The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1):7–23. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710004068.
  • Lövbrand, E., M. Hjerpe, and B.-O. Linnér. 2017. Making climate governance global: How UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime. Environmental Politics 26 (4):580–99. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019.
  • Masood, E., and J. Tollefson. 2021. COP26 hasn’t solved the problem: Scientists react to UN climate deal. Nature 599 (7885):355–6. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-03431-4.
  • Masood, E., J. Tollefson, and A. Irwin. 2022. COP 27 climate talks: What succeeded, what failed, and what’s next. Nature 612 (7938):16–7. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-03807-0.
  • McDermott, C., B. Vira, J. Walcott, M. Brockhaus, M. Harris, E. M. Kumeh, and C. de Mendonça Gueiros. 2022. The evolving governance of REDD+. In Forests, climate, biodiversity and people: Assessing a decade of REDD+, eds. J. Parotta, S. Mansourian, C. Wildburger and N. Grima, 21–60. Vienna: IUFRO.
  • Mol, A. P., G. Spaargaren, and D. A. Sonnenfeld. 2013. Ecological modernization theory: Taking stock, moving forward. In Routledge international handbook of social and environmental change, eds. S. Lockie, D. A. Sonnenfeld, and D. Fisher, 31–46. London: Routledge.
  • Monbiot, G. 2015. Grand promises of Paris climate deal undermined by squalid retrenchments. The Guardian, December 12. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2015/dec/12/paris-climate-deal-governments-fossil-fuels.
  • Parker, C. F., C. Karlsson, M. Hjerpe, and B.-O. Linnér. 2012. Fragmented climate change leadership: Making sense of the ambiguous outcome of COP-15. Environmental Politics 21 (2):268–86. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.651903.
  • Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2):251–67. doi: 10.2307/2586011.
  • Putnam, R. D. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027697.
  • REDD+. 2022. Safeguards. https://redd.unfccc.int/fact-sheets/safeguards.html (accessed October 3, 2022).
  • Spaargaren, G., and A. P. J. Mol. 1992. Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society & Natural Resources 5 (4):323–44. doi: 10.1080/08941929209380797.
  • Staggenborg, S. 1993. Critical events and the mobilization of the pro-choice movement. Research in Political Sociology 6:319–45.
  • Stevenson, H. 2021. Reforming global climate governance in an age of bullshit. Globalizations 18 (1):86–102. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1774315.
  • Stoddart, M. C. J., H. Ramos, K. Foster, and T. Ylä-Anttila. 2021. Competing crises? Media coverage and framing of climate change during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Environmental Communication 2021, 1969978. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2021.1969978.
  • Tobin, P., and N. M. Schmidt. 2020. European Union leadership before, during and after the Paris Conference of the Parties. In Climate governance across the globe, eds. R. K. W. Wurzel, M. S. Andersen, and P. Tobin, 142–59. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Toussaint, P. 2018. Voices unheard – Affected communities and the climate negotiations on loss and damage. Third World Thematics 3 (5–6):765–84. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2018.1597640.
  • UNFCCC. 2021. Glasgow Climate Pact (accessed 3 December 2021). https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cop26_auv_2f_cover_decision.pdf.
  • Zelli, F., and H. van Asselt. 2015. Fragmentation. In Research handbook on climate governance, eds. K. Bäckstrand and E. Lövbrand, 121–31. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.