Normative Basis for Climate-Related Civic Engagement by Residents of Lake Superior’s North Shore region

References

• Abrahamse, W., L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25 (3):273–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamse, W., L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter. 2007. The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (4):265–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84 (5):888–918. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amel, E., C. Manning, B. Scott, and S. Koger. 2017. Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356 (6335):275–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., and M. Conner. 2001. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 40 (4):471–99. doi: 10.1348/014466601164939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S. 2003. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., and G. Möser. 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (1):14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., J. Rees, and S. Seebauer. 2015. Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology 43:155–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Duluth, Minnesota. 2018. Sustainability. https://duluthmn.gov/sustain/ (accessed December 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• City of Grand Marais, Minnesota. 2019. Climate action plan. https://www.ci.grand-marais.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7B33D7F42E-203A-42E0-8979-44AF7108C86C%7D/uploads/CAP_Final.pdf (accessed December 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., and L. Steg. 2009. Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology 149 (4):425–49. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.4.425-449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Guttry, C., M. Doring, and B. Ratter. 2016. Challenging the current climate change-migration nexus: exploring migrants’ perceptions of climate change in the hosting country. Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin 147 (2):109–18. doi: 10.12854/erde-147-8.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., A. Dan, and R. Shwom. 2007. Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences*. Rural Sociology 72 (2):185–214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, J. 2019. Going green in Cook County. WTIP North Shore Community Radio. https://www.wtip.org/going-green-cook-county (accessed December 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3):382–8. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., S. Fujii, A. Gärling, and C. Jakobsson. 2003. Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00081-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, N., J. K. Swim, and L. Glenna. 2019. Spread the green word: A social community perspective into environmentally sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior 51 (5):561–89. doi: 10.1177/0013916518812925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. 2011. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist 66 (4):290–302. doi: 10.1037/a0023566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Great Lakes Commission des Gran Lacs. 2017. Great Lakes Restoration at work in Minnesota. https://www.glc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/GLC-Minnesota-GLRI-Fact-Sheet-2017-Final-20170309.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hansla, A., A. Gamble, A. Juliusson, and T. Gärling. 2008. The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28 (1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson-Easey, S., S. Williams, A. Hansen, K. Fogarty, and P. Bi. 2015. Speaking of climate change: A discursive analysis of lay understandings. Science Communication 37 (2):217–39. doi: 10.1177/1075547014568418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, P., H. Staats, and H. A. M. Wilke. 2007. Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 29 (4):323–34. doi: 10.1080/01973530701665058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, J. M., H. R. Hungerford, and A. N. Tomera. 1987. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education 18 (2):1–8. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. 2016. Multiple latent variables: Confirmatory factor analysis (David A. Kenny). http://davidakenny.net/cm/mfactor.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2016. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, G. W., K. Hayhoe, L. B. Johnson, J. J. Magnuson, S. Polasky, S. K. Robinson, B. J. Shuter, M. M. Wander, D. J. Wuebbles, D. R. Zak, et al. 2003. Confronting climate change in the Great Lakes region: Impacts on our communities and ecosystems. Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/confronting-climate-change-great-lakes
   Google Scholar
• Klöckner, C. A. 2013. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change 23 (5):1028–38. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake Superior North One Watershed One Plan. n.d. https://www.co.lake.mn.us/document_center/SWCD_Doc_Center/One%20Watershed%20One%20Plan%20Lake%20Superior%20North%201.pdf (accessed November 11, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lake Superior South Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary. n.d. MN Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-ws4-41b.pdf (accessed November 11, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., R. C. Stedman, C. B. Cooper, and D. J. Decker. 2015. Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 43:112–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., E. Maibach, S. Rosenthal, and J. Kotcher. 2021. Climate change in the American mind, September 2021. Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., S. Nicholson-Cole, and L. Whitmarsh. 2007. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17 (3–4):445–59. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama, G. 1998. Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H. O. Portner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Pean, R. Pikcock, et al. 2018. Global warming of 1.5-degree celcius. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 degree C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Lake Superior—North. (n.d.). https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/watersheds/lake-superior-north (accessed July 11, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Lake Superior—South. (n.d.). https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/watersheds/lake-superior-south (accessed July 11, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota State Climatology Office. n.d. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate_change_info/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, R. M., V. Champine, J. J. Vaske, and A. Mertens. 2020. Does the impact of norms vary by type of norm and type of conservation behavior? A meta-analysis. Society & Natural Resources 33 (8):1024–40. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2020.1729912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noe, R., B. Keeler, T. Twine, K. Brauman, T. Mayer, and M. Rogers. 2019. Climate change projections for improved management of infrastructure, industry, and water resources in Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/209130.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2014. Deficit reduction declines as policy priority. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/legacy-pdf/01-27-14-Policy-Priorities-Release-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2017. After seismic political shift, modest changes in public’s policy agenda. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/01/24/after-seismic-political-shift-modest-changes-in-publics-policy-agenda/.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhananga, A. K., E. Green, J. Shepard, and M. A. Davenport. 2021. The influence of community attachment and environmental concern on climate-related civic engagement in Lake Superior’s north shore region. Journal of Coastal Conservation 25 (1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11852-021-00816-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhananga, A. K., and M. A. Davenport. 2017. Community attachment, beliefs, and residents’ civic engagement in stormwater management. Landscape and Urban Planning 168:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhananga, A. K., M. A. Davenport, and V. Perry. 2017. The influence of beliefs and norms on landowners’ civic engagement in water resource protection. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 72 (6):639–49. doi: 10.2489/jswc.72.6.639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhananga, A. K., M. A. Davenport, and B. Olson. 2015. Landowner motivations for civic engagement in water resource protection. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 51 (6):1600–12. doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, S. C., K. E. Kunkel, and J. T. Schoof. 2009. Did precipitation regimes change during the twentieth century? In Understanding climate change: Climate variability, predictability and change in the Midwestern United States, 100–12. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, S. C., D. Scavia, C. Downer, M. Gaden, L. Iverson, R. Nordstrom, J. Patz, and G. P. Robertson. 2014. Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://nca2014.globalchange.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, J. H., and S. Bamberg. 2014. Climate protection needs societal change: Determinants of intention to participate in collective climate action. European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (5):466–73. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, C., D. Karoly, M. Vicarelli, P. Neofotis, Q. Wu, G. Casassa, A. Menzel, T. L. Root, N. Estrella, B. Seguin, et al. 2008. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453 (7193):353–7. doi: 10.1038/nature06937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, L. 2019. Americans as concerned as ever about global warming. Gallup News. http://news.gallup.com/poll/248027/americans-concerned-ever-global-warming.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sarzynski, A. 2015. Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities. Urban Climate 14:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. 2011. Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior 45 (1):1–26. doi: 10.1177/0013916511421196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldt, J., L. Rickard, and J. Yang. 2018. Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology 55:147–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., J. M. Nolan, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicius. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 18 (5):429–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., and R. G. Lomax. 2004. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 1977. Normative influences on altruism. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60358-5.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A. S., A. Zwickle, J. T. Bruskotter, and R. Wilson. 2017. The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environmental Science & Policy 73:93–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. 1986. Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology 16:159–86. doi: 10.2307/270922.
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., and J. De Groot. 2010. Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology 49 (4):725–43. doi: 10.1348/014466609X477745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., L. Dreijerink, and W. Abrahamse. 2005. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25 (4):415–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. 2007. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences 42 (5):893–8. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3):407–24. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, and J. S. Black. 1985. Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment 8 (3–4):204–22. doi: 10.1007/BF01263074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. 2015 data profiles. https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/2015/
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, S., E. Maibach, and A. Leiserowitz. 2015. Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10 (6):758–63. doi: 10.1177/1745691615598516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar