Misalignment Between Citizen Science Project Leaders and Their Organizations Increases the Challenges They Face Achieving Project Outcomes

References

• Adiguzel, Z., and I. Kucukoglu. 2019. Examining of the effects of employees on work stress, role conflict and job insecurity on organizational culture. International Journal of Economics and Management 1 (4):37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Akimoto, H. 2003. Global air quality and pollution. Science (New York, NY) 302 (5651):1716–19. doi:10.1126/science.1092666.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., E. Williams, M. Long, E. Carter, and J. Volckens. 2020. Organizationally based citizen science: Considerations for implementation. Journal of Science Communication 19 (03):A01. doi:10.22323/2.19030201.
   Google Scholar
• Anhalt-Depies, C., J. L. Stenglein, B. Zuckerberg, P. A. Townsend, and A. R. Rissman. 2019. Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science. Biological Conservation 238 (October):108195. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108195.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, H. L., T. B. Phillips, and L. Robinson. 2018. Conservation outcomes of citizen science. In Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy, eds. S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, and A. Bonn, 254–68. UCL Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, B. J. 1986. Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology 12 (1):67–92. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. 2020. Sensitizing concepts. In Sage research methods foundations. SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781526421036.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Capdevila, A. S. L., A. Kokimova, S. S. Ray, T. Avellán, J. Kim, and S. Kirschke. 2020. Success factors for citizen science projects in water quality monitoring. The Science of the Total Environment 728:137843. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Vol. 10. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and D. L. Miller. 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice 39 (3):124–30. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, I. 2022. Changing behaviour, changing investment, changing operations”: Using citizen science to inform the management of an urban river. Area 54 (3):490–500. doi:10.1111/area.12597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., V. Del Bianco, K. Peterman, A. Grover, T. Phillips, and R. Becker-Klein. 2022. Diverse and important ways evaluation can support and advance citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 7 (1):30. doi:10.5334/cstp.482.
   Google Scholar
• Dedoose Version 9.0.17. 2021. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. L., B. Zuckerberg, and D. N. Bonter. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41 (1):149–72. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, R. R., H. K. Ramapriyan, G. Peng, and Y. Wei. 2021. Perspectives on citizen science data quality. Frontiers in Climate 3:615032. doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.615032.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, R., and V. Strezov. 2015. An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. Plos One 10 (11):e0143687. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, Y., H. A. Ben-David, R. B. Tiegs, N. Avital, and U. Yeverechyahu. 1998. The interactive effect of role conflict and role ambiguity on job performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 71 (1):19–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1998.tb00659.x.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, H., A. Dyke, R. Pateman, S. West, and G. Everett. 2016. Understanding motivations for citizen science. UK Environmental Observation Framework. https://www.ukeof.org.uk/resources/citizen-science-resources/MotivationsforCSREPORTFINALMay2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Golumbic, Y. N., D. Orr, A. Baram-Tsabari, and B. Fishbain. 2017. Between vision and reality: A case study of scientists’ views on citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2 (1):6. doi:10.5334/cstp.53.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, P. J., J. S. I. Ingram, and M. Brklacich. 2005. Climate change and food security. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 360 (1463):2139–48. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., D. Fraisl, B. Greshake Tzovaras, S. Hecker, M. Gold, G. Hager, L. Ceccaroni, B. Kieslinger, U. Wehn, S. Woods, et al. 2021. Contours of citizen science: A vignette study. Royal Society Open Science 8 (8):202108. doi:10.1098/rsos.202108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., Z. Liu, J. Wu, X. Pan, Z. Fang, J. Li, and B. A. Bryan. 2021. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nature Communications 12 (1):4667. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. 2017. Designing citizen science projects. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Committee on Public Participation in Science. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_189605.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, I. R., S. Mousavi, and P. Hughes. 2022. New development: Citizen science—discovering (new) solutions to wicked problems. Public Money & Management 42 (2):133–6. doi:10.1080/09540962.2021.1967630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., and T. M. Probst. 2015. Do your employees (collectively) trust you? The importance of trust climate beyond individual trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management 31 (4):526–35. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, R., S. A. Gray, D. V. Howe, W. R. Brooks, and J. G. Ehrenfeld. 2011. Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 25 (6):1148–54. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, P. W., V. Galaz, M. Dyer, N. Matthews, C. Folke, M. Nyström, and S. E. Cornell. 2019. Anthropocene risk. Nature Sustainability 2 (8):667–73. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0327-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. N. 2014. Qualitative research method - phenomenology. Asian Social Science 10 (21):298–310. doi:10.5539/ass.v10n21p298.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, J. R., B. R. Smith, and T. A. Sprinkle. 2017. Is it the job or the support? Examining structural and relational predictors of job satisfaction and turnover intention for nonprofit employees. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 46 (3):652–71. doi:10.1177/0899764016685859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmala, M., A. Wiggins, A. Swanson, and B. Simmons. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14 (10):551–60. doi:10.1002/fee.1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Hunter, D. E., G. J. Newman, and M. M. Balgopal. 2020. Citizen scientist or citizen technician: A case study of communication on one citizen science platform. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5 (1):17. doi:10.5334/cstp.261.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Hunter, D. E., G. J. Newman, and M. M. Balgopal. 2023. What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 21 (5):244–50. doi:10.1002/fee.2635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., T. Dietz, S. R. Carpenter, M. Alberti, C. Folke, E. Moran, A. N. Pell, P. Deadman, T. Kratz, J. Lubchenco, et al. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science (New York, NY) 317 (5844):1513–6. doi:10.1126/science.1144004.
   Google Scholar
• Lorke, J., Y. N. Golumbic, C. Ramjan, and O. Atias. 2019. Training needs and recommendations for citizen science participants, facilitators, and designers. CA15212. Cost. European Cooperation in Science and Technology. https://nhm.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10141/622589/CA15212_Report_Training_needs_and_recommendations_for_CS.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Lottig, N. R., T. Wagner, E. Norton Henry, K. Spence Cheruvelil, K. E. Webster, J. A. Downing, and C. A. Stow. 2014. Long-term citizen-collected data reveal geographical patterns and temporal trends in lake water clarity. PLoS ONE 9 (4):e95769. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, M., H. Peter, H. Arp, M. B. Tekman, and A. Jahnke. 2021. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science (New York, NY) 373 (6550):61–5. doi:10.1126/science.abg5433.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, A. J., S. Friel, A. Nyong, and C. Corvalan. 2008. Global environmental change and health: Impacts, inequalities, and the health sector. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 336 (7637):191–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.39392.473727.AD.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalak, A. M. 2016. Study role of climate change in extreme threats to water quality. Nature 535 (7612):349–50. doi:10.1038/535349a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderifar, M., H. Goli, and F. Ghaljaie. 2017. Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education 14 (3):1–4. doi:10.5812/sdme.67670.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., and H. Joffe. 2020. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19 (January):160940691989922. doi:10.1177/1609406919899220.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, T. H., and M. D. Morecroft. 2014. Interactions between climate change and land use change on biodiversity: attribution problems, risks, and opportunities. WIREs Climate Change 5 (3):317–35. doi:10.1002/wcc.271.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C., S. Scott, and A. Geddes. 2019. Snowball sampling. In SAGE research methods foundations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781526421036831710.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, M., T. Diekötter, and K. Kremer. 2019. Participant outcomes of biodiversity citizen science projects: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 11 (10):2780. doi:10.3390/su11102780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, M. J. O., D. S. Chapman, L. J. Sheppard, and H. E. Roy. 2014. Choosing and using citizen science: A guide to when and how to use citizen science to monitor biodiversity and the environment. Wallingford: Center for Ecology and Hydrology. https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/sepa_choosingandusingcitizenscience_interactive_4web_final_amended-blue1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Polkowska, D. 2014. Why the scientific pipeline is still leaking? Women scientists and their work–life balance in Poland. International Studies in Sociology of Education 24 (1):24–43. doi:10.1080/09620214.2014.895133.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, J. R., R. J. House, and S. I. Lirtzman. 1970. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 15 (2):150. doi:10.2307/2391486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santori, C., R. J. Keith, C. M. Whittington, M. B. Thompson, J. U. Van Dyke, and R. J. Spencer. 2021. Changes in participant behaviour and attitudes are associated with knowledge and skills gained by using a turtle conservation citizen science app. People and Nature 3 (1):66–76. doi:10.1002/pan3.10184.
   Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., and P. Stephan. 2013. Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science 24 (3):889–909. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter, D., W. Cramer, R. Leemans, I. C. Prentice, M. B. Araújo, N. W. Arnell, A. Bondeau, H. Bugmann, T. R. Carter, C. A. Gracia, et al. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science (New York, NY) 310 (5752):1333–7. doi:10.1126/science.1115233.
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, J. L., H. L. Ballard, C. C. Wilderman, T. Phillips, A. Wiggins, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, M. Minarchek, B. C. Lewenstein, M. E. Krasny, et al. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: A framework for intentional design. Ecology and Society 17 (2):29–29. doi:10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibieta, L., and I. Tahir. 2023. What has happened to college teacher pay in England? The Institute for Fiscal Studies. doi:10.1920/re.ifs.2023.0254.
   Google Scholar
• Sluss, D. M., and B. E. Ashforth. 2007. Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review 32 (1):9–32. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23463672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylinski, C. D., K. Peterman, T. Phillips, J. Linhart, and R. Becker-Klein. 2020. Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: A snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 10 (1):77–92. doi:10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey, A. H., and M. C. Domroese. 2013. Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors? Human Ecology Review 20 (1):15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubre, T. C., and J. M. Collins. 2000. Jackson and Schuler (1985) revisited: A meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict, and job performance. Journal of Management 26 (1):155–69. doi:10.1177/014920630002600104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, C., K. Bentein, and A. Panaccio. 2017. Affective commitment to organizations and supervisors and turnover: A role theory perspective. Journal of Management 43 (7):2090–117. doi:10.1177/0149206314559779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth’ s ecosystems. Science 277 (5325):494–9. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S., A. Dyke, and R. Pateman. 2021. Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 6 (1):14. doi:10.5334/cstp.370.
   Google Scholar
• Winship, C., and M. Mandel. 1983. Roles and positions: A critique and extension of the blockmodeling approach. Sociological Methodology 14:314. doi:10.2307/270911.
   Google Scholar
• Zurcher, L. A. 1983. Social roles: Conformity, conflict and creativity (sociological observations). 1st ed. SAGE Publications Inc. doi:10.2307/2069136.
   Google Scholar