The Impact of Social Norms on Intended Individual and Collective Civic Actions Related to Wolf Reintroduction

References

• Abrahamse, W., and L. Steg. 2013. Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change 23 (6):1773–85. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, R., and J. Goggin. 2005. What do we mean by ‘civic engagement’? Journal of Transformative Education 3 (3):236–53. doi:10.1177/1541344605276792.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA21965086.
   Google Scholar
• Amel, E., C. M. Manning, B. Scott, and S. Koger. 2017. Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356 (6335):275–9. doi:10.1126/science.aal1931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year (2013–2017). 2017. Citizen voting age population special tabulation (ACS 2017-5 year estimate) [data file]. https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/explore.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., and G. Möser. 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (1):14–25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall, J., W. Casola, N. Peterson, L. Larson, W. Carr, E. Seekamp, K. Stevenson, and B. Jackson. 2021. Cultural cognition and ideological framing influence communication about zoonotic disease in the era of COVID-19. Frontiers in Communication 6:23–35. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.645692.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 30 (3):582–92. doi:10.1111/cobi.12681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., C. Galais, and M. Coulombe. 2018. The effect of social pressure from family and friends on turnout. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36 (9):2824–41. doi:10.1177/0265407518802463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R., C. Fariss, J. Jones, A. D. I. Kramer, C. Marlow, J. Settle, and J. Fowler. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489 (7415):295–8. doi:10.1038/nature11421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, A., and M. Manfredo. 1996. A conceptual model of attitudes toward natural resource issues: A case study of wolf reintroduction. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1 (1):1–21. doi:10.1080/10871209609359048.
   Google Scholar
• Bruskotter, J. 2013. The predator pendulum revisited: Social conflict over wolves and their management in the Western United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37 (3):674–79. doi:10.1002/wsb.293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson and K. P. Huyvaert. (2010). AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Casola, W. R., J. Rushing, S. Futch, V. Vayer, D. Lawson, M. J. Cavalieri, L. Larson, and M. N. Peterson. 2020. How do YouTube videos impact tolerance of wolves? Human Dimensions of Wildlife 25 (6):531–43. doi:10.1080/10871209.2020.1773582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champine, V., M. Jones, S. Lischka, J. Vaske, and R. Niemiec. 2022. Understanding individual and diffusion behaviors related to native plant gardening. Journal of Environmental Psychology 81:101798. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R., C. A. Kallgren, and R. R. Reno. 1991. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24: 201–34. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R., and M. Trost. 1998. Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In The handbook of social psychology, edited by D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, 151–92. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. 2004. The effect of social conformity on collective voting behavior. Political Analysis 12 (1):76–96. doi:10.1093/pan/mpg015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorado Secretary of State. 2020. Colorado Election Results: 2020 general election. State Offices & Questions. https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CO/105975/web.264614/#/summary?category=C_2Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, K., G. Grolleau, and L. Ibanez. 2017. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics 140:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieldhouse, E., and D. Cutts. 2020. Do as I say or do as I do? How social relationships shape the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms of voting. British Journal of Political Science 51 (4):1516–28. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieldhouse, E., D. Cutts, and J. Bailey. 2020. Who cares if you vote? Partisan pressure and social norms of voting. Political Behavior 44 (3):1297–316. doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09661-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Montgomery, IL: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franchini, M., M. Corazzin, S. Bovolenta, and S. Filacorda. 2021. The return of large carnivores and extensive farming systems: A review of stakeholders’ perception at an EU level. Animals 11 (6):1735. doi:10.3390/ani11061735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsche, I., M. Barth, P. Jugert, T. Masson, and G. Reese. 2018. A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review 125 (2):245–69. doi:10.1037/rev0000090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, M., and S. Johnson. 2022. Why do young people engage in some civic actions and not others? Exploring the roles of individual and collective civic efficacy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 33 (2):356–73. doi:10.1002/casp.2661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, B., A. Landon, C. Miller, and B. Williams. 2021. Trust and emotions predict support for large carnivore recovery in the absence of real threats. Society & Natural Resources 34 (10):1318–37. doi:10.1080/08941920.2021.1953202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, N., and J. Swim. 2016. Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology 47:79–90. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N., R. Cialdini, and V. Griskevicius. 2008. A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (3):472–82. doi:10.1086/586910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. 2019, August. Eastern Washington Wolf Pack Eliminated. https://www.drovers.com/article/eastern-washington-wolf-pack-eliminated.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., and R. Niemiec. 2020. Social-psychological correlates of personal-sphere and diffusion behavior for wildscape gardening. Journal of Environmental Management 276:111271. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knackmuhs, E., J. Farmer, and D. Knapp. 2018. The relationship between narratives, wildlife value orientations, attitudes, and policy preferences. Society & Natural Resources 32 (3):303–21. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1517916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon, A., C. Miller, and B. Williams. 2018. Assessing Illinois residents’ support for natural recolonization of apex predators. Environmental Management 63 (2):260–9. doi:10.1007/s00267-018-1129-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lischka, S., T. Teel, H. Johnson, and K. Crooks. 2019. Understanding and managing human tolerance for a large carnivore in a residential system. Biological Conservation 238:108189. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokhorst, A. M., H. Staats, J. van Dijk, E. van Dijk, and G. de Snoo. 2011. What’s in it for me? Motivational differences between farmers’ subsidised and non-subsidised conservation practices. Applied Psychology 60 (3):337–53. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00438.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, F., and B. McQuinn. 2014. Conservation’s blind spot: The case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation 178:97–106. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M., R. Berl, T. Teel, and J. Bruskotter. 2021. Bringing social values to wildlife conservation decisions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19 (6):355–62. doi:10.1002/fee.2356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M., T. Teel, M. Gavin, and D. Fulton. 2014. Considerations in representing human individuals in socio-ecological models. In Understanding society and natural resources: Forging new strands of integration across the social sciences, edited by M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, A. Rechkemmer, and E. A. Duke, 137–58. New York: SpringerOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Marchini, S., and D. Macdonald. 2012. Predicting Ranchers’ intention to kill Jaguars: Case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal. Biological Conservation 147 (1):213–21. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., J. Knoll, and C. Von Sikorski. 2017. The ‘spiral of silence’ revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression. Communication Research 45 (1):3–33. doi:10.1177/0093650217745429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadow, R., R. Reading, M. Phillips, M. Mehringer, and B. J. Miller. 2005. The influence of persuasive arguments on public attitudes toward a proposed wolf restoration in the southern rockies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33 (1):154–63. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[154:TIOPAO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, T. 2020. Wolves in Washington state: Managing final steps to recovery and post-recovery. Washington Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nie, M. 2001. The sociopolitical dimensions of wolf management and restoration in the United States. Human Ecology Review 8 (1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, R., N. Ardoin, F. K. Brewer, S. Kung, and K. Lopez. 2018. Increased neighbor interaction and fear of social sanctions: Associations with resident action to control the invasive little fire ant. Society & Natural Resources 31 (10):1149–68. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1456594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, R., R. E. W. Berl, M. Gonzalez, T. Teel, C. Camara, M. Collins, J. Salerno, K. Crooks, C. Schultz, S. Breck, et al. 2020a. Public perspectives and media reporting of wolf reintroduction in Colorado. PeerJ 8 (May):e9074. doi:10.7717/peerj.9074.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niemiec, R., R. E. W. Berl, M. Gonzalez, T. Teel, J. Salerno, S. Breck, C. Camara, M. Collins, C. Schultz, D. Hoag, et al. 2022. Rapid changes in public perception toward a conservation initiative. Conservation Science and Practice 4 (4):e12632. doi:10.1111/csp2.12632.
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, R., V. Champine, J. Vaske, and A. Mertens. 2020. Does the impact of norms vary by type of norm and type of conservation behavior? A meta-analysis. Society & Natural Resources 33 (8):1024–40. doi:10.1080/08941920.2020.1729912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, R., S. Sekar, M. Gonzalez, and A. Mertens. 2020b. The influence of message framing on public beliefs and behaviors related to species reintroduction. Biological Conservation 248:108522. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate, J., M. Manfredo, A. Bright, and G. Tischbein. 1996. Coloradan’s attitudes toward reintroducing the gray wolf into Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24 (3):421–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R., and K. Real. 2005. How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research 32 (3):389–414. doi:10.1177/0093650205275385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheaffer, R. L., W. Mendenhall, and L. Ott. 1996. Elementary survey sampling. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• St John, F., G. Edwards-Jones, and J. Jones. 2010. Conservation and human behaviour: Lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research 37 (8):658–67. doi:10.1071/WR10032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. 2017. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education 48 (6):1273–96. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teel, T., A. Bright, and M. Manfredo. Regional results from the pilot phase of the research project entitled “Wildlife Values in the West”. Project Report (55). Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeden, L., K. Slagle, M. Crowther, C. Dickman, and T. Newsome. 2020. Linking social identity, risk perception, and behavioral psychology to understand predator management by livestock producers. Restoration Ecology 28 (4):902–10. doi:10.1111/rec.13154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. 2019. Survey research and analysis. 2nd ed. Colorado: Venture Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmann, K., J. Vaske, M. Manfredo, and H. Zinn. 1998. Standards for lethal response to problem urban wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 3 (4):29–48. doi:10.1080/10871209809359137.
   Google Scholar