REFERENCES
- Howes EL, Sooy JW, Harvey SC. The healing of wounds as determined by tensile strength. J Am Med Assoc. 1929;92:42–45.
- Sandbloom P. The tensile strength of healing wounds: An experimental study. Acta Chir Scand. 1944;90 (Suppl. 89):1–108.
- Herrmann JB, Woodward MD, Pulaski J. Healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964;119:269 –275.
- Van Winkle W. The tensile strength of wounds and factors that influence it. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;129:819 – 842.
- Fellows NM, Burge J, Hatch CS, Price PB. Suture strength and healing strength of end-to-end intestinal anastomoses. Surg Forum. 1951;2:111–117.
- Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;126:747 –753.
- Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE. Specifc activity of hydroxyproline-tritium in the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;126:1061 –1065.
- Ballantyne GH. Intestinal suturing: Review of the exper- imental foundations for traditional doctrines. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26:836–843.
- Madsen ET. An experimental and clinical evaluation of surgical suture materials. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953;97:73–80.
- Madsen ET. An experimental and clinical evaluation of surgical suture materials: II. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953;97:439–444.
- Madsen ET. An experimental and clinical evaluation of surgical suture materials: III. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958;106:216 –224.
- Ballantyne GH, Burke BJ, Rogers G, Lambert EG, Boccia J. Accelerated wound healing with stapled enteric suture lines. An experimental study comparing traditional sewing techniques and a stapling device. Ann Surg. 1985;20:360–364.A. Hardy TG, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anas- tomosis: An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:484–490.
- O’neill P, Healey JE, Clark RL, Gallager HS. Non-suture intestinal anastomosis. Am J Surg. 1962;104:761 – 767.
- Hjortrup A, Nordkild P, Kiaergaard J, Sjntoft E, Olesen HP. Fibrin adhesive versus sutured anastomosis: A compara- tive intraindividual study in the small intestine of pigs. Br J Surg. 1986;73:760 –761.
- Toriumi DM, Raslan WF, Friedman M, Tardy MU. Histotox- icity of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:546 –550.
- Ellis Daf, Shaikh A. The ideal tissue adhesive in fa- cial plastic and reconstructive surgery. J Otolaryngol. 1990;19:68–72.
- Cameron JL, Woodward SC, Pulaski EJ, Sleeman HK, Brandes G, Kulkarni RK, Leonard F. The degradation of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. I. Surgery. 1965;58:424 – 430.
- Watson DP. Use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for closing facial lacerations in children. Br Med J. 1989;299:1014.
- O’shera C. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and facial lacerations. Br Med J. 299:1217–1218.
- Papatheofani s FJ. Surgical repair of rabbit tibia osteotomy using isobutyl-cyanoacrylate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108:236 –237.
- Powell ES, Trail IA, Noble J. Non suture repair of tendon. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11:215 –218.
- Shuber J. Transcervical sterilization with use of methyl- 2-cyanoacrylate and a newer delivery system (the femcepte-device). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:887 – 889.
- McCuen BW, Hida T, Sheta SM: Transvitreal cyanoacry- late retinopexy in managemen t of complicated retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104:127 –132.
- Izzidien AY, Samarrai AI, Jessen K, Haque KR. Endoscopic obliteration of a recurrent tracheoesophagea l fstula. J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22:993.
- Eng J, Sabanatha n S. Tissue adhesive in bronchial closure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:683 –685.
- Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Etiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1973;60:461–464.
- Hesp F, Hendriks T, Lubbers EC, Deboer HHM. Wound healing in the intestinal wall: A comparison between experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses. Dis Col Rectum. 1984;27:99–104.