Regeneration of Uterine Horn Using Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Grafts in Rabbits

REFERENCES

• Speroff L. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility, 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan KJ. Kistner’s Gynecology & Women’s Health, 7th ed. St. Louis, MO; Mosby; 1999:325–372.
   Google Scholar
• Westrom L. Incidence, prevalence, and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138(7 Pt 2):880–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen EH. Projections of impaired fecundity among women in the United States: 1995 to 2020. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(2):205–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra A, Stephen EH. Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982–1995. Family Plan Perspect. 1998;30(1):34–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephen EH, Chandra A. Updated projections of infertility in the United States: 1995–2025. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(1):30–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckett W, Bentick B. The epidemiology of infertility in a rural population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(3):233–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull MG, Cahill DJ. Female infertility. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998;27(4):851–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavletic AJ, et al. Infertility following pelvic inflamma-tory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1999;7(3):145–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urbach DR, Cohen MM. Is perforation of the appendix a risk factor for tubal infertility and ectopic pregnancy? An appraisal of the evidence. Can J Surg. 1999;42(2):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler AM, Hulka J, Peretz A. Reversibility of female sterilization. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(4):499–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubuisson JB, et al. Sterilization reversal: Fertility results. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(5):1145–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh TG, Kondaveeti U, Darling MR. The management of female infertility by tubal microsurgical reconstruction: A ten year review. Irish J Med Sci. 1995;164(3):212–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauwerky JF, et al. Hydrosalpinx formation and its regeneration after microsurgical reconstruction—A functional and morphological study on rabbits. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(11):2090–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauwerky JF, Klose RP, Forssmann WG. [Healing of tubal anastomoses—Microsurgery vs. fibrin gluing: Morphologic aspects]. Zentralbl Gynaekol. 1994;116(3):173–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gauwerky JF, Klose RP, Forssmann WG. Fibrin glue for anastomosis of the fallopian tube—Morphology. Hum Re-prod. 1993;8(12):2108–2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauwerky JF, et al. Fibrin glue for reanastomosis of the fallopian tube in the rabbit: Adhesions and fertility. Hum Reprod. 1992;7(9):1274–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauwerky JF, Vetter H, Bastert G. [Functional aspects of healing in microsurgical tubal anastomosis—Experimental studies of the rabbit fallopian tube]. Zentralbl Gynaekol. 1992;114(9):450–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gauwerky JF. [Endoscopic sterilization reversal]. Zentralbl Gynaekol. 1991;113(15–16):865–868.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gauwerky JF, Reinecke M, Forssmann WG, [Fibrin glue anastomoses of the uterine tube using various experimental conditions]. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1989;245(1–4):419–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gauwerky JF, Kubli F, Forssmann WG. Morphology and fertility after re-anastomosis of the rabbit fallopian tube with fibrin glue. Hum Reprod. 1988;3(3):327–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, et al. Small intestinal submucosa as a large diameter vascular graft in the dog. J Surg Res. 1989;47(1):74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, et al. Small intestional submucosa: A rapidly resorbed bioscaffold for augmentation cystoplasty in a dog model. Tissue Eng. 1998;4(4):379–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kropp BP, et al. Rabbit urethral regeneration using small intestinal submucosa onlay grafts. Urology. 1998;52(1):138–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook Biotech, Inc. Cook Biotech Incorporated Home Page, http://www.cookgroup.com. 2001, Cook Biotech, Inc., West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Lantz GC, et al. Small intestinal submucosa as a vascular graft: A review. J Invest Surg. 1993;6(3):297–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cormack D. Essential histology. In: Winters R, ed. Introduction to Histology, rev ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:281–283.
   Google Scholar
• Voytik-Harbin SL, et al. Identification of extractable growth factors from small intestinal submucosa. J Cell Biochem. 1997;67(4):478–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson TB, et al. Galalpha(1,3)Gal epitope in porcine small intestinal submucosa. Tissue Eng. 2000;6(3):233–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavcnik D, et al. The square stent-based large vessel occluder: An experimental pilot study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;11(9):1227–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak S, et al. Resorbable bioscaffold for esophageal repair in a dog model. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(7):1097–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajitani M, et al. Use of a new elastin patch and glue for repair of a major duodenal injury. ASAIO J. 2000;46(4):409–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portis AJ, et al. Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty with different biodegradable grafts in an animal model. J Urol. 2000;164(4):1405–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie H, et al. Use of reconstructed small intestine submucosa for urinary tract replacement. ASAIO J. 2000;46(3):268–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvano CJ, et al. Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty using the novel biomaterial Surgisis: Small-intestinal submucosa. J Endourol. 2000;14(2):213–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portis AJ, et al. Laparoscopic midsagittal hemicystectomy and replacement of bladder wall with small intestinal submucosa and reimplantation of ureter into graft. J Endourol. 2000;14(2):203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng EY, Kropp BP. Urologic tissue engineering with small-intestinal submucosa: Potential clinical applications. World J Urol. 2000;18(1):26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp BP, Cheng EY. Bioengineering organs using small intestinal submucosa scaffolds: In vivo tissue-engineering technology. J Endourol. 2000;14(1):59–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak S, et al. Endothelial cell adherence to small intestinal submucosa: An acellular bioscaffold. Biomaterials. 1999;20(23–24):2257–2263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suckow MA, et al. Enhanced bone regeneration using porcine small intestinal submucosa. J Invest Surg. 1999;12(5):277–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin GA. Repair of a full thickness corneoscleral defect in a German shepherd dog using porcine small intestinal submucosa. J Small Anim Pract. 1999;40(7):340–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalhav AL, et al. Laparoscopic replacement of urinary tract segments using biodegradable materials in a large-animal model. J Endourol. 1999;13(4):241–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP, Clarke RB. Use of small intestinal submucosal implants for regeneration of large fascial defects: An experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;46(2):203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SS, et al. Small intestinal submucosa as a small-caliber venous graft: A novel model for hepatocyte transplantation on synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds with direct access to the portal venous system. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(1):124–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb MA, et al. Porcine small intestinal submucosa as a dural substitute. Surg Neurol. 1999;51(1):99–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kropp BP, Small-intestinal submucosa for bladder augmentation: A review of preclinical studies. World J Urol. 1998;16(4):262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, et al. Small intestinal submucosa: A substrate for in vitro cell growth. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1998;9(8):863–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb MA, et al. Histology after dural grafting with small intestinal submucosa. Surg Neurol. 1996;46(4):389–393; discussion 393–394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kropp BP, et al. Regenerative urinary bladder augmentation using small intestinal submucosa: Urodynamic and histopathologic assessment in long-term canine bladder augmentations. J Urol. 1996;155(6):2098–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KM, et al. Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res. 1996;60(1):107–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaught JD, et al. Detrusor regeneration in the rat using porcine small intestinal submucosal grafts: Functional innervation and receptor expression. J. Urol. 1996;155(1):374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiles MC, et al. Mechanical properties of xenogeneic small-intestinal submucosa when used as an aortic graft in the dog. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29(7):883–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, et al. The use of xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa as a biomaterial for Achilles tendon repair in a dog model. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29(8):977–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp BP, et al. Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a bladder wall substitute. Urology. 1995;46(3):396–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandusky GE, Lantz GC, Badylak SF. Healing comparison of small intestine submucosa and ePTFE grafts in the canine carotid artery. J Surg Res. 1995;58(4):415–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevel CD, et al. Experimental evaluation of small intestinal submucosa as a microvascular graft material. Micro-surgery. 1994;15(8):586–591; discussion 592–593.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp PM, et al. Biocompatibility of small-intestinal submucosa in urinary tract as augmentation cystoplasty graft and injectable suspension. J Endourol. 1994;8(2):125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, et al. Comparison of the resistance to infection of intestinal submucosa arterial autografts versus polytetrafluoroethylene arterial prostheses in a dog model. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19(3):465–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiles MC, et al. Porosity of porcine small-intestinal submucosa for use as a vascular graft. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27(2):139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloeckner DC, et al. Mechanical evaluation and design of a multilayered collagenous repair biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52(2):365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeder R, et al. Compliance, elastic modulus, and burst pressure of small-intestine submucosa (SIS), small-diameter vascular grafts. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47(1):65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks MS, Gloeckner DC, Quantification of the fiber architecture and biaxial mechanical behavior of porcine intestinal submucosa. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;46(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitson BA, et al. Multilaminate resorbable biomedical device under biaxial loading. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43(3):277–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene CH, et al. An alternative to synthetic aortic grafts using jejunum. J Invest Surg. 2000;13(1):333–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White M. The development and application of a burst pressure devise to measure the integrity of small intestinal submucosal vascular grafts. In: Biomedical Sciences. 2000; Philadelphia: Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine: 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ballestas LY, Marshall SE. See one, do one, teach one: Motivating the preclinical medical student [editorial]. J Invest Surg. 1999;12(6):301–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies HG, Pau KY, Yang SP. Coiltal and estrogen signals: A contrast in the preovulatory neuroendocrine networks of rabbits and rhesus monkeys. Biol Reprod. 1997;56(2):310–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo A, Kast A. Two decades of control Himalayan rabbit reproductive parameters and spontaneous abnormalities in Japan. Lab Anim. 1995;29(1):78–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borkowski RK, Karas AZ. Sedation and anesthesia of pet rabbits. Clin Techniques Small Anim Pract. 1999; 14(1)44–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore K. Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1992:180–181.
   Google Scholar