The Role of Suture Fixation on Mesh Contraction after Abdominal Hernia Repair

REFERENCES

• Schuster R, Curet M J, Alami R S, et al. Concurrent gastric bypass and repair of abdominal wall hernias. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 1205–1208
   Google Scholar
• DuBay D A, Wang X, Adamson B, et al. Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties: a mechanism for decreased hernia recurrences in comparison with suture repair. Surgery 2006; 140: 14–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud Uslu H Y, Erkek A B, Cakmak A, et al. Incisional hernia treatment with polypropylene graft: results of 10 years. Hernia. 2006; 10: 380–384
   Google Scholar
• Nicolo E. Inguinal hernia repair with spermatex, the first 100 cases. Int Surg 2005; 90: 35–39
   Google Scholar
• Conze J, Kingsnorth A, Flamant J B, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1488–1493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G, et al. Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 61–64
   Google Scholar
• Strzelczyk J M, Szymanski D, Nowicki M E, et al. Randomized clinical trial of postoperative hernia prophylaxis in open bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 1347–1350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellon S M, Lopez-Hervas P, Rodriguez M, et al. Abdominal wall closure: a new prophylactic mesh concept. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 490–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, et al. Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8: 672–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, et al. Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49: 1131–1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Cetinkaya F, et al. The inflammatory response to open tension-free inguinal hernioplasty versus conventional repairs. Am J Surg 1998; 175: 179–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conze J, Rosch R, Klinge U, et al. Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence pore size and surface area. Hernia. 2004; 8: 365–372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson T N, Clarke J H, Schoen J, et al. Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 1556–1560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiVita G, D'Agostino P, Patti R, et al. Acute inflammatory response after inguinal and incisional hernia repair with implantation of polypropylene mesh of different size. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005; 390: 306–311
   Google Scholar
• Conze J, Krones C J, Schumpelick V, et al. Incisional hernia: challenge of re-operations after mesh repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2007; 392: 453–457
   Google Scholar
• Delikoukos S, Tzovaras G, Liakou P, et al. Late onset deep mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2007; 11: 15–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greca F H, de Paula J B, Biondo-Simoes M LP, et al. The influence of differing pore size on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Hernia. 2001; 5: 59–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zieren J, Castenholz E, Jacobi C A, et al. Is mesh fixation necessary in abdominal hernia repair. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1999; 384: 71–75
   Google Scholar
• Kivirikko K I, Laitinen O, Prockop D J. Modifications of specific assay for hydrxyproline in urine. Anal Biochem. 1967; 19: 249–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger J W, Halm J A, Wijsmuller A R, et al. Evaluation of a new prosthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 1320–1325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schug-Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, et al. A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 402–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb W S, Kercher K W, Heniford B T. The argument of lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2005; 2: 63–69
   Google Scholar
• Cobb W S, Burns T M, Peindl R D, et al. Textile analysis of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 2006; 136: 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amid P K. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997; 1: 15–21
   Google Scholar
• Harrell A G, Novitsky Y W, Peindl R D, et al. Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intrabdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model. Am Surg. 2006; 72: 808–813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, et al. Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 1998; 164: 965–969
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheidbach H, Tannapfel A, Schmidt U, et al. Influence of titanium coating on the biocompatibility of a heavy weight polypropylene mesh. An animal experimental model. Eur Surg Res. 2004; 36: 313–317
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S G, Hair A, Baxter G M, et al. Does contraction of mesh following tension-free hernioplasty effect testicular or femoral vessel blood flow. Hernia. 2001; 5: 13–15
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Fugate K, McClusky D, et al. Relationship between tissue ingrowths and mesh contraction. World J Surg. 2005; 29: 1038–1043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar