Isolated Capsulorhexis Flap Technique in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery to Protect the Corneal Endothelial Cells

REFERENCES

• Rao GN, Aquavella JV, Goldberg SH, Berk SL. Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Relationship to preoperative corneal endothelial status. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:1135–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacifico RL. Ultrasonic energy in phacoemulsification: Mechanical cutting and cavitation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:338–341.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80587-1]. PMID:8064612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:1079–1084.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80121-0]. PMID:8915805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zeng M, Liu X, Luo L, Yuan Z, Xia Y, et al. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:287–292.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.044]. PMID:17276271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can I, Takmaz T, Cakici F, Ozgul M. Comparison of Nagahara phaco-chop and stop-and-chop phacoemulsification nucleotomy techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:663–668.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.06.006]. PMID:15050265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravalico G, Tognetto D, Baccara F, Lovisato A. Corneal endothelial protection by different viscoelastics during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:433–439.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80190-3]. PMID:9159690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abouzeid H, Ferrini W. Femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery: a review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:597–603.[https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12416]. PMID:24835818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir-Asgari S, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Using continuous intraoperative optical coherence tomography to classify swirling lens fragments during cataract surgery and to predict their impact on corneal endothelial cell damage. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1029–1036.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.04.029]. PMID:27492102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshinoff SA. Dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:167–173.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(99)80121-7]. PMID:9951659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest P, Rhem M, McDermott M, Lavery K, Sensoli A. Phacoemulsification conditions resulting in thermal wound injury. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1829–1839.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00908-7]. PMID:11709258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubowitz A, Assia EI, Rosner M, Topaz M. Antioxidant protection against corneal damage by free radicals during phacoemulsification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1866–1870.[https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0892]. PMID:12714617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron MD, Poyer JF, Aust SD. Identification of free radicals produced during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:463–470.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00643-X]. PMID:11255062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuschel A, Bogatsch H, Barth T, Wiedemann R. Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1855–1861.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.060] PMID:21029892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosrirukvongs P, Slade SG, Berkeley RG. Corneal endothelial changes after divide and conquer versus chip and flip phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:1006–1012.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80072-7]. PMID:9379369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milla E, Verges C, Cipres M. Corneal endothelium evaluation after phacoemulsification with continuous anterior chamber infusion. Cornea. 2005;24:278–282.[https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000138851.49203.c4]. PMID:15778598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EC, Byun YS, Kim MS. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1799–1805.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.024]. PMID:21839609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell RG, Kerr NM, Howie AR, Mustaffa Kamal MA, Allen PL, Vote BJ. Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1777–1783.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.031]. PMID:25217072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell RG, Kerr NM, Vote BJ. Toward zero effective phacoemulsification time using femtosecond laser pretreatment. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:942–948.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.045]. PMID:23465860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takacs AI, Kovacs I, Mihaltz K, Filkorn T, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ. Central corneal volume and endothelial cell count following femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery compared to conventional phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:387–391.[https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20120508-02]. PMID:22589291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Yu Y, Song X, Zhu Y, Wang W, Yao K. Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nuclear cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:486–491.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.010]. PMID:28532933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Cha D, Song YB, Choi JY, Han YK. Effects of senofilcon A mechanical protector on corneal endothelial cells during phacoemulsification in rabbit eyes: Pilot study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:394–399.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.006]. PMID:28410724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar