Comparison of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolithesis: A Meta-Analysis

REFERENCES

• Issack PS, Cunningham ME, Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Cammisa FP, Jr. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(8):527–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymoyer JW, Selby DK. Segmental instability. Rationale for treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985;10(3):280–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(8):936–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs FM, Urrutia G, Alarcon JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(20):E1335–51. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820c97b1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray CD. Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(6):667–679; discussion 79–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs H, Milligan PR. Chip fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal canal, JBJS. 1944;26(1):125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Steffee AD, Sitkowski DJ. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and plates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:99–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Kim HG. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(2):210–219; discussion 9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller H, Hedlund R. Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis–a prospective randomized study: part 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(13):1711–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai LY, Jia LS, Yuan W, Ni B, Zhu HB. Direct repair of defect in lumbar spondylolysis and mild isthmic spondylolisthesis by bone grafting, with or without facet joint fusion. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(1):78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a prospective controlled study in the Han nationality. Int Orthop. 2009;33(4):1043–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantas FL, Prandini MN, Ferreira MA. Comparison between posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in adult spondylolisthesis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007;65(3B):764–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro AR, Ring D, Scuderi G, Cohen DS, Garfin SR. Predictors of outcome in patients with chronic back pain and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(17):2030–2034; discussion 5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Loubresse CG, Bon T, Deburge A, Lassale B, Benoit M. Posterolateral fusion for radicular pain in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996(323): 194–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audat Z, Moutasem O, Yousef K, Mohammad B. Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine. Singapore Med J. 2012;53(3):183–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia G, Scotti C, Mandelli D, Sala G. Posterior spinal instrumentation: biomechanical study on the role of rods on hardware response to axial load. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 1):S3–S7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL. A biomechanical comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior fusion in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15(1):53–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(14):1536–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rosa G, Conti A, Cacciola F, et al. Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion? J Neurosurg. 2003;99(2 Suppl):143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodke DS, Dick JC, Kunz DN, McCabe R, Zdeblick TA. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(1):26–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, Bae SC, Suk KS. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(12):1351–1357; discussion 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbanti Brodano G, Lolli F, Martikos K, et al. Fueling the debate: Are outcomes better after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or after posterolateral fusion (PLF) in adult patients with low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis? Evid Based Spine Care J. 2010;1(1): 29–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dehoux E, Fourati E, Madi K, Reddy B, Segal P. Posterolateral versus interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis: functional results in 52 cases with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70(6):578–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abed KE. The Surgical Management of Low Grade Single Level Adult Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Posterolateral Fusion vs Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Global Spine Journal. 2016;1.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sharkawi MM, Refai OA, Ali HM, El-Sherif EK. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in treatment of adult spondylolisthesis, AAMJ. 2005;3(2).
   Google Scholar
• Farrokhi MR, Rahmanian A, Masoudi MS. Posterolateral versus posterior interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(8):1567–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aygun H, Cakar A, Huseyinoglu N, Huseyinoglu U, Celik R. Clinical and radiological comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior interbody fusion techniques for multilevel lumbar spinal stabilization in manual workers. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(5):571–580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SH, Chung BJ, Lee HY, Shin SW. A comparison between interspinous ligamentoplasty, posterior interbody fusion, and posterolateral fusion in the treatment of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Joint Diseases & Related Surgery. 2005;53(2):111.
   Google Scholar
• Musluman AM, Yilmaz A, Cansever T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(4):488–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajarajan NS, Balakrishnan V. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis: assessment and clinical outcome. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2015;2(46):8236–8240.
   Google Scholar
• Kuraishi S, Takahashi J, Mukaiyama K, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of L4 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(1):143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk M, Smit TH, Sugihara S, Burger EH, Wuisman PI. The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(7):682–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantigan JW, Neidre A. Achievement of normal sagittal plane alignment using a wedged carbon fiber reinforced polymer fusion cage in treatment of spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2003;3(3): 186–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suratwala SJ, Pinto MR, Gilbert TJ, Winter RB, Wroblewski JM. Functional and radiological outcomes of 360 degrees fusion of three or more motion levels in the lumbar spine for degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(10): E351–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole CD, McCall TD, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009;2(2): 118–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(20):2312–2320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Wang L, Gong H, Zhu D. Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Biomed Eng Online. 2012;11:31.doi:10.1186/1475-925X-11-31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagg O, Fritzell P, Ekselius L, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine S. Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(1): 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kho VK, Chen WC. Posterolateral fusion using laminectomy bone chips in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Int Orthop. 2008;32(1): 115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar