Preliminary Evaluation of the Viability of Peritoneal Drainage Catheters Implanted in Rats for Extended Durations

REFERENCES

• Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st ed. New York: Elsevier Limited, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary K, Haddadin S, Nistala R, Papageorgio C. Intraperitoneal drug therapy: An advantage. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010;5:82–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner PV, Brabb T, Pekow C, Vasbinder MA. Administration of substances to laboratory animals: Routes of administration and factors to consider. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. JAALAS. 2011;50:600–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feshitan JA, Legband ND, Borden MA, Terry BS. Systemic oxygen delivery by peritoneal perfusion of oxygen microbubbles. Biomaterials. 2014;35:2600–2606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legband ND, Feshitan JA, Borden MA, Terry BS. Evaluation of peritoneal microbubble oxygenation therapy in a rabbit model of hypoxemia. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015;62:1376–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokal R, Khanna R, Krediet RT, Nolph, KD. Textbook of Peritoneal Dialysis [Internet]. 2nd ed. Netherlands: Springer; 2000 [cited 2017 Jul 20]. Available from: http://www.springer.com/la/book/9789401732253.
   Google Scholar
• Kim CY, Kumar A, Sampath L, Sokol K, Modak S. Evaluation of an antimicrobial-impregnated continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter for infection control in rats. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002;39:165–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito F, Serafino MD, Ambrosio C, et al. Chronic peritoneal dialysis in children: the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of peritoneal catheter obstruction. J. Ultrasound. 2016;19:191–196. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathuria P, Moore HL, Mehrotra R, Prowant BF, Khanna R, Twardowski ZJ. Evaluation of healing and external tunnel histology of silver-coated peritoneal catheters in rats. Adv. Perit. Dial. Conf. Perit. Dial. 1996;12:203–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCartan D, Gray R, Harty J, Blake G. Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion in a Northern Ireland district general hospital. Ulster Med. J. 2015;84:166–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross EA, Batich CD, Clapp WL, Sallustio JE, Lee NC. Tissue adhesion to bioactive glass-coated silicone tubing in a rat model of peritoneal dialysis catheters and catheter tunnels. Kidney Int. 2003;63:702–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareie M, Keuning ED, ter Wee PM, Beelen RH, van den Born J. Improvement of a chronic rat model for peritoneal dialysis by using heparin-coated catheters. Adv. Perit. Dial. Conf. Perit. Dial. 2004;20:150–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crabtree JH, Chow K-M. Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Semin. Nephrol. 2017;37:17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Davidson I, Minhajuddin A, Gieser S, Nurenberg M, Saxena R. Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter survival: A nine year single center study in 315 patients. J. Vasc. Access. 2010;11:316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash SR, Janle EM. T-fluted peritoneal dialysis catheter. Adv. Perit. Dial. Conf. Perit. Dial. 1993;9:223–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ash SR, Sutton JM, Mankus RA, et al. Clinical trials of the T-fluted (Ash Advantage) peritoneal dialysis catheter. Adv. Ren. Replace. Ther. 2002;9:133–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orak JK, Rajagopalan PR, Hanevold CD, Hiott KL. Acute peritoneal dialysis utilizing a non-luminal channeled catheter in infants. Adv. Perit. Dial. Conf. Perit. Dial. 1992;8:429–432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litbarg NO, Gudehithlu KP, Sethupathi P, Arruda JA, Dunea G, Singh AK. Activated omentum becomes rich in factors that promote healing and tissue regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;328:487–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Pancholi N, Patel J, et al. Omentum facilitates liver regeneration. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG. 2009;15:1057–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Dulchavsky SA, Saxe J. Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic arterial, portal venous, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow. J. Trauma. 1992;33:279–282; discussion 282–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbrain MLNG, Vidts W, Ravyts M, De Laet I, De Waele J. Acute intestinal distress syndrome: the importance of intra-abdominal pressure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74:657–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papavramidis TS, Kotidis E, Ioannidis K, et al. The effects of chronically increased intra-abdominal pressure on the rabbit diaphragm. Obes. Surg. 2012;22:487–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh QL, Choong C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2013;19:485–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, O'Brien FJ. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2010;4:377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatoum L. Diffusion modeling and device development for peritoneal membrane oxygenation. Thesis, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2016; Available from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mechengdiss/96.
   Google Scholar
• Dell'Aquila R, Chiaramonte S, Rodighiero MP, et al. Rational choice of peritoneal dialysis catheter. Perit. Dial. Int. 2007;27:S119–S125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR. The purse-string suture revisited: A useful technique for the closure of cutaneous surgical wounds. Int. J. Dermatol. 2007;46:341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR. The cuticular purse string suture: A modified purse string suture for the partial closure of round postoperative wounds. Int. J. Dermatol. 2007;46:746–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo J, Custis T, Armstrong AW, et al. Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling DP, Miller IS, Ardhaoui M, Gallagher WM. Effect of surface wettability and topography on the adhesion of osteosarcoma cells on plasma-modified polystyrene. J. Biomater. Appl. 2011;26:327–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today. 2011;14:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondossola E, Holzapfel BM, Alexander S, Filippini S, Hutmacher DW, Friedl P. Examination of the foreign body response to biomaterials by nonlinear intravital microscopy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2016;1:0007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 2008;20:86–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Chen C, Heimbürger O, Waniewski J, Bergström J, Lindholm B. Hyaluronan decreases peritoneal fluid absorption in peritoneal dialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1997;8:1915–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzlan M, Pawlaczyk K, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Korybalska K, Breborowicz A, Oreopoulos DG. Peritoneal surface area and its permeability in rats. Perit. Dial. Int. 1997;17:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen V. Neglected Factors in Pharmacology and Neuroscience Research: Biopharmaceutics, Animal Characteristics, Maintenance, Testing Conditions. 1st ed. New York: Elsevier; 2013.
   Google Scholar