Does Suture Material Affect Uterine Scar Healing After Cesarean Section? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

REFERENCES

• Mistry K, Fingar KR, Elixhauser A. Variation in the Rate of Cesarean Section Across U.S. Hospitals, 2013: Statistical Brief #211. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville.
   Google Scholar
• Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. Zeeb H, ed. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2009 [www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2009/en/index.html]. Last accessed 11 May 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Health Statıstıcs Yearbook. 2015. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Nomenclature Of Territorial Units For Statistics and Provinces.
   Google Scholar
• Betran A, Torloni M, Zhang J, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Bjog. 2016;123(5):667–670. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13526. PMID:26681211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007- 08. Lancet. 2010;375:490–499. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5. PMID:20071021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335(7628):1025. doi:10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55. PMID:17977819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JP, Gulmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health. BMC Med. 2010;8:71. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-71. PMID:21067593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:172–175. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris H. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14:16–20. doi:10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethicon Inc. Wound Closure Manual. 2005. Available at: http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/surgery/Education/facilities/measey/Wound_Closure_Manual.pdf. ( accessed December 12, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie D. The history of sutures. Med Hist. 1973;17:158–168. doi:10.1017/S0025727300018469. PMID:4578411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenberg JA, Clark RM. Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2:146–158. PMID:19826572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tower AM1, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(5):562–572. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranov A, Gunnarsson G, Salvesen KÅ, Isberg PE, Vikhareva O. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(4):499–505. doi:10.1002/uog.14833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikhareva Osser O, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:90–97. doi:10.1002/uog.6395. PMID:19499514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging manifestations of cesarean scar defect in reproductive-aged women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:893–902. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020. PMID:27393285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T, et al. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:429–434. doi:10.1080/00016340500430436. PMID:16612704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bij de Vaate AJ, Brolmann HA, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JA. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:93–99. doi:10.1002/uog.8864. PMID:21031351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Lee CL, Kay N. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:370.e1–370.e4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.038. PMID:19318145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, et al. Why do niches develop in caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2695–2702. PMID:26409016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasmin S, Sadaf J, Fatima N. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011;21:522–526. PMID:21914406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG. 2010;117:1366–1376. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x. PMID:20840692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):234–248. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60441-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CC, Williams DF. Effects of physical configuration and chemical structure of suture materials on bacterial adhesion. A possible link to wound infection. Am J Surg. 1984;147:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvig KA, Biagotti GR, Leknes KN, Wikesjö UM. Oral tissue reactions to suture materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998;18:474–487. PMID:10093524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaf U, Breuninger H. Resorbable suture material in the human skin: tissue reaction and modified suture technic. Hautarzt. 1988;39:23–27. PMID:3128494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar