Effects of Lumbar Fusion Surgery with ISOBAR Devices Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery on Pain and Disability in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

REFERENCES

• Farshad-Amacker NA, Hughes AP, Aichmair A, Herzog RJ, Farshad M. Determinants of evolution of endplate and disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: a multifactorial perspective. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(9):1863–8. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3382-z. PMID:24898310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1413–23. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1513721. PMID:27074066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian J, Bao Z, Li X, Zou J, Yang H. Short-term therapeutic efficacy of the ISOBAR TTL dynamic internal fixation system for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc diseases. Pain Physician. 2016;19(6):E853–61. PMID:27454275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang YJ, Zhao SJ, Zhang Q, Nong LM, Xu NW. Comparison of lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems versus fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2017;83(1):180–93. PMID:29322911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scemama C, Magrino B, Gillet P, Guigui P. Risk of adjacent-segment disease requiring surgery after short lumbar fusion: results of the French spine surgery society series. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(1):46–51. doi:10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15700. PMID:26967992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Hong Y, Liu H, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiographic results between ISOBAR posterior dynamic stabilization and posterior lumbar inter-body fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a four-year retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;136:100–6. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.06.003. PMID:26093226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander KY, Siegfried CM, Chew B, et al. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic fusion systems in the lumbar spine: implications for stabilization with improved arthrodesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(7):E325–30. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827588b1. PMID:23059703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu MS, Su SF. Nursing care of lumbar spinal fusion surgery using a semi-rigid device (ISOBAR). Hu Li Za Zhi. 2016;63(2):120–6. doi:10.6224/JN.63.2.120. PMID:27026564. [in Chinese].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao J, Zhao W, Zhang X, et al. MRI analysis of the ISOBAR TTL internal fixation system for the dynamic fixation of intervertebral discs: a comparison with rigid internal fixation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:43. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-9-43. PMID:24898377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Li F, Yu S, et al. Two-year follow-up results of the ISOBAR TTL Semi-Rigid rod system for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(3):394–9. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.02.043. PMID:23266080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao MJ, Zhong ZM, Zeng JH. Effectiveness of ISOBAR TTL system in treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013;28(3):25–7. doi:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2013.03.008. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• He ZQ, Zhou WP, Wu LL, Guo HL, Wu ME, Yi SH. Clinical effectiveness of ISOBAR dynamic device combined with lumbar fusion surgery in the treatment of lumbar spine degenerative disease. Hainan Med J. 2015;26(15):2293–5. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2015.15.0826. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Yavin D, Casha S, Wiebe S, et al. Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(5):701–5. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw162. PMID:28327997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson WR, Gee JE, Billys JB, Castellvi AE. Hybrid dynamic stabilization with posterior spinal fusion in the lumbar spine. SAS J. 2011;5(2):36–43. doi:10.1016/j.esas.2011.01.003. PMID:25802666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu L, France A, Xie Y, Fang K, Gan Y, Zhang P. Functional and radiological outcomes of semi-rigid dynamic lumbar stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion after 2 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(5):605–10. doi:10.1007/s00402-014-1961-4. PMID:24563148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Li ZH, Zhu XD, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion versus dynamic stabilization system for degenerative lumbar disease. J Spinal Surg. 2011;9(4):226–31. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2011.04.010. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Li ZH, Wang SY, Fu Q, Ma H, Tang H, Chang CL. Application of ISOBAR dynamic stabilization system in treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Chin J Bone Joint Injury. 2011;26(11):973–6. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane.org [Internet]; c. 2006. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions, version 4.2.6. London: United Kingdom. 2006 Sept [cited 2016 May 12]. http://training.cochrane.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. PMID:8721797.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiavetta NM, Martins AR, Henriques IC, Fregni F. Differences in methodological quality between positive and negative published clinical trials. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(10):2389–403. doi:10.1111/jan.12380. PMID:24660826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919. PMID:27733354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature: essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. Washington (DC): American Medical Association; 2015:544.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann I, Santesso N, Akl EA, et al. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;72:45–55. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.017. PMID:26772609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juang CM. A guide to interpreting meta-analysis papers from clinicians. Taiwan Med J. 2011;54(2):74–82. [ in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZM, Jin DD, Cheng JT. Comparative study of dynamic fixation with rigid fixation in the management of degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008;46(5):346–9. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0529-5815.2008.05.008. PMID:18785529. [in Chinese].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao XQ, Jiang H, Cheng YQ, Jiang JM, Qu DD, Chen JT. Over two-year results of ISOBAR TTL fixation system from the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Orthop J China. 2017;25(3):199–203. doi:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2017.03.02. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Mok FP, Samartzis D, Karppinen J, Fong DY, Luk KD, Cheung KM. Modic changes of the lumbar spine: prevalence, risk factors, and association with disc degeneration and low back pain in a large-scale population-based cohort. Spine J. 2016;16(1):32–41. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.060. PMID:26456851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen YF, Ju LX, Min SX, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical effects of ISOBAR TTL semi-rigid dynamic stabilization system versus rigid fixation in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Orthop J China. 2011;19(5):373–7. doi:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2011.05.06. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZM, Liu ZZ, Jin DD. Lumbar dynamic device for preventing adjacent segment degeneration after rigid lumbar fixation. J Spinal Surg. 2010;8(6):321–4. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2010.06.001. [ in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Liu M, Kan WS, Li P, He DW. ISOBAR non-fusion internal fixation system in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: an analysis of preliminary outcome. Acad J Second Mil Med Univ. 2011;31(4):455–7. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1008.2011.00455. [ in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Wang HM, Li HQ, Shi RM, Zhou Q, Hou TY, Liu LH. Evaluation of discectomy combined with Isobar dynamic stabilization for lumbar disc protrusion. J Third Mil Med Univ. 2013;35(10):1022–6. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Bao ZH, Yang HL, Zhange ZM, Ji YM, Mei H. Discectomy and Isobar placement for single-level lumbar disc herniation complicated with segmental instability, a three-year follow-up study. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord. 2014;24(12):1085–9. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2014.12.06. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Xu HT, Fu Q. Efficacy of posterior ISOBAR non-fusion device in the treatment of lumbar spinal degenerative diseases. Orthop J China. 2013;21(11):1149–52. doi:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2013.11.19. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Yan YM, Li SP. Treatment of single-segment intervertebral fusion with ISOBAR dynamic fixation on adjacent segment for degenerative lumbar disease. Chin J Clin Basic Orthop Res. 2014;6(2):89–94. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-666X.2014.02.005. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Liu YB, Fu Q. Posterior ISOBAR non-fusion internal fixation system in repair of lumbar disc herniation: more advantages in restoring range of motion of lumbar spine. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2015;19(13):2051–56. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.13.016. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar