http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-2321
REFERENCES
- Karakus S, Akkar OB, Yildiz C, Yenicesu GI, Cetin M, Cetin A. Comparison of effectiveness of laminaria versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical preparation before operative hysteroscopy in women of reproductive age: a prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):46–52.
- Al-Fozan H, Firwana B, Al Kadri H, Hassan S, Tulandi T. Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(4):CD005998.
- Lin YH, Hwang JL, Seow KM, Huang LW, Chen HJ, Hsieh BC. Laminaria tent vs misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy: randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(6):708–12.
- Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol and osmotic dilator in achieving cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg. 2006;3(3):186–9.
- Darwish AM, Ahmad AM, Mohammad AM. Cervical priming prior to operative hysteroscopy: a randomized comparison of laminaria versus misoprostol. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2391–4.
- Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032–44.
- Phillips DR, Nathanson HG, Milim SJ, Haselkorn JS. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on the force needed for cervical dilatation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):507–11.
- Patabendige M, Jayawardane A. Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey. BMC Res Notes 2017;10(1):155.
- Ande AB, Ezeanochie CM, Olagbuji NB. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(4):967–71.
- Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O’Neill MJ, McCleery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG. 2009;116(11):1443–52.
- Tulandi T, Béique F, Kimia M. Pulmonary edema: a complication of local injection of vasopressin at laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(3):478–80.
- Martin JD, Shenk LG. Intraoperative myocardial infarction after paracervical vasopressin infiltration. Anesth Analg. 1994;79(6):1201–2.
- Nezhat F, Admon D, Nezhat CH, Dicorpo JE, Nezhat C. Life-threatening hypotension after vasopressin injection during operative laparoscopy, followed by uneventful repeat laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;2(1):83–6.
- Azar D, Thomford NR, Pace WG, Sirinek KR. Intra-arterial vasopressin administration complicated by adverse cardiodynamic effects. Rev Surg. 1977; 34(2):140–4.
- Corliss RJ, McKenna DH, Sialer S, O’Brien GS, Rowe GG. Systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of vasopressin. Am J Med Sci. 1968;256(5):293–9.
- Filipovic N, Nikolic D, Saveljic I, et al. Computer simulation of cervical tissue response to a hydraulic dilator device. Theor Biol Med Model. 2013;10(1):64.
- Batukan C, Ozgun MT, Ozcelik B, Aygen E, Sahin Y, Turkyilmaz C. Cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of vaginal and oral misoprostol. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):966–73.
- Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y. A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(4):990–4.