References
- Liu Q, Li P, Sun Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function recovery. J Invest Surg. 2020;33(4):381–386.
- Bogani G, Multinu F, Dowdy SC, et al. Incorporating robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer staging: analysis of morbidity and costs. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141(2):218–24.
- Senturk MB, Doğan O. Sacrospinous ligament fixation under local anesthesia in elderly patients at high risk of general anesthesia. J Invest Surg. 2018;7:1–7.
- Bogani G, Borghi C, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, et al. Minimally invasive surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(4):552–62.
- Bogani G, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(5):857–62.
- Jiang W, Liang M, Han D, et al. A modification of laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy to reduce postoperative bladder dysfunction: a retrospective study. J Invest Surg. 2018;5:1–9. doi:10.1080/08941939.2017.1412542.
- Bogani G, Rossetti DO, Ditto A, et al. Nerve-sparing approach improves outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(3):402–10.
- Bogani G, Raspagliesi F. Minimally invasive nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a Win–Win Scenario. J Invest Surg. 2018:1–2. doi:10.1080/08941939.2017.1413149. [Epub ahead of print].
- Ramirez PT, Frumovitz, M, Pareja, R, et al. "Phase III randomized trial of laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy vs. abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: LACC trial" SGO 2018. Late-Breaking Abstract 1.
- Melamed, A, Chen, L, Keating, NL, del Carmen, MG, Wright, JD, Rauh-Hain, JA. "Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive staging surgery in women with early-stage cervical cancer" SGO 2018. Late-Breaking Abstract 2.