Comparative analysis for five fixations of Pauwels-I by the biomechanical finite-element method

References

• Moussa ME, Esposito CI, Elpers ME, Wright TM, Padgett DE. Hip dislocation increases roughness of oxidized zirconium femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 59 retrievals. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(4):713–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, Haidukewych GJ. Results of internal fixation of Pauwels type-3 vertical femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(8):1654–1659.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pauwels F. Der Schenkelhalsbruch, ein mechanisches problem. Stuttgart: F. Enke 1935; 53–67
   Google Scholar
• Jin YP, Xu G, Wan QQ. Finite element analysis for firmness of 2 internal fixators of femoral neck fracture type Pauwells III. J. Zhejiang Practical Medicine 2010;2(2):123–126.
   Google Scholar
• Parker MJ, Khan RJ, Crawford J, Pryor GA. Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(8):1150–1155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhang C, Luo Y. A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthopaed. (Sicot). 2013;37(12):2465–24737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enocson A, Lapidus L. The vertical hip fracture - a treatment challenge. A cohort study with an up to 9 year follow-up of 137 consecutive hips treated with sliding hip screw and antirotation screw . BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13:171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsami S, Saberi S, Sadighi S, Rouhi G. Comparison of three fixation methods for femoral neck fracture in young adults: experimental and numerical investigations. J Med Biol Eng. 2015;35(5):566–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdero R, Bougherara H, Dubov A, et al. The effect of cortex thickness on intact femur biomechanics: a comparison of finite element analysis with synthetic femurs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010; 224 (7):831–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dragomir-Daescu D, Op Den Buijs J, McEligot S, et al. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 39(2):742–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Zhao M, Yan Y, et al. Finite element analysis of a bone healing model: 1-year follow-up after internal fixation surgery for femoral fracture. Pak J Med Sci. 2014; 30 (2):343–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieding J, Souffrant R, Fritsche A, Mittelmeier W, Bader R. Finite element analysis of osteosynthesis screw fixation in the bone stock: an appropriate method for automatic screw modelling. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(3):e33776–e33786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng MJ, Hu Y, Ju X, Cai DZ. Clinical significance of creative 3D-image fusion across [ct + mr] modalities based on approach of characteristic co-registration. j Med Imaging Hlth Inform. 2016; 6 (1):71–∼e77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobatho MC, Rho JY, Ashman RB. Anatomical variation of human cancellous bone mechanical properties in vitro. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997; 40 (1):157–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramos A, Simoes J. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral fnite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Med Eng Phys. 2006; 28 (9) :916–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senalp AZ, Kayabasi O, Kurtaran H. Static, dynamic and fatigue behavior of newly designed stem shapes for hip prosthesis using finite element analysis. Mater Design. 2007; 28(5) :1577–1583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayabasi O, Ekici B. The effects of static, dynamic and fatigue behavior on three-dimensional shape optimization of hip prosthesis by finite element method. Materials and Design 2007;28(8):2269–2277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi MG, Advani SG, Miller F, Santare MH. Analysis of a femoral hip prosthesis designed to reduce stress shielding. J Biomech. 2000; 33 (12):1655–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluess D, Souffrant R, Mittelmeier W, Wree A, Schmitz K-P, Bader R. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009;95(1):23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blecha LD, Zambelli PY, Ramaniraka NA, Bourban P-E, Månson J-A, Pioletti DP. How plate positioning impacts the biomechanics of the open wedge tibial osteotomy; a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2005;8(5):307–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, Higuchi F, Tagawa Y, Inoue A. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(4):505–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reggiani B, Cristofolini L, Varini E, Viceconti M. Predicting the subject-specific primary stability of cementless implants during pre-operative planning: preliminary validation of subject-specific fnite-element models. J Biomechanics. 2007; 40(11):2552–2558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang GD, Liao WJ, Tao SX. Exploration for material assignment and effectiveness validation of femoral neck FEA. J Tissue Eng. Reach 2009; 52 (3):10263–10268.
   Google Scholar
• Chen WP, Tai CL, Shih CH, Hsieh PH, Leou MC, Lee MS. Selection of fixation devices in proximal femur rotational osteotomy: clinical complications and finite element analysis. Clin Biomech. 2004; 19(3):255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maehara Y, Tsujitani S, Saeki H, et al. Biological mechanism and clinical effect of protein-bound polysaccharide K (KRESTIN(®)): review of development and future perspectives. Surg Today. 2012;42(1):8–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai CL, Chen WP, Chen HH, Lin CY, Lee MS. Biomechanical optimization of different fixation modes for a proximal femoral L-osteotomy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10 (:112–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viceconti M, Muccini R, Bernakiewicz M, Baleani M, Cristofolini L. Large sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J Biomech. 2000; 33 (12):1611–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yih-Shiunn L, Chien-Rae H, Wen-Yun L. Surgical treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Int Orthopaed. (Sico. 2007;31(5):677–682. SICOT)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar