REFERENCES
- Slezak P, Keibl C, Redl H, et al. An efficacy comparison of two hemostatic agents in a porcine liver bleeding model: gelatin/thrombin flowable matrix versus collagen/thrombin powder. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 2019;1–11. [ahead of print].
- Lewis KM, Li Q, Jones DS, et al. Development and validation of an intraoperative bleeding severity scale for use in clinical studies of hemostatic agents. Surgery. 2017;161:771–781.
- Spotnitz WD, Zielske D, Centis V, et al. The SPOT GRADE: A new method for reproducibly quantifying surgical wound bleeding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:E664–E671.
- https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02502019
- Ardehali A, Spotnitz WD, Hoffman RW, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a new hemostatic powder using a quantitative surface bleeding severity scale. J Card Surg. 2019;32:50–62.
- Delilkan AE. Comparison of subjective estimates by surgeons and anaesthetists of operative blood loss. Br Med J. 1972;2:619–621.
- Schorn MN. Measurement of blood loss: review of the literature. J Midwifery Women Health. 2010;55:20–27.
- Guinn NR, Broomer BW, White W, et al. Comparison of visually estimated blood loss with direct hemoglobin measurement in multilevel spine surgery. Transfusion. 2013;53:2790–2794.
- Adkins AR, Lee D, Woody DJ Jr., et al. Accuracy of blood loss estimations among anesthesia providers. AANA J. 2014;82:300–306.
- Dildy GA, 3rd, Paine AR, George NC, et al. Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:601–606.