Abdominal Hysterectomy with a Uterine Manipulator Minimizes Vaginal Shortening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

References

• Moen M. Hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus: total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43(3):431–440. PMID: 27521877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helstrom L, Lundberg PO, Sörbom D, Bäckström T. Sexuality after hysterectomy: a factor analysis of women’s sexual lives before and after subtotal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:357–362. PMID: 8437786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castallo MA, Wainer AS. Length of the vagina following abdominal hysterectomy, total and subtotal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950;60(2):406–410. PMID: 15432541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter K, Lakomy W. Length of the vagina after abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1953;75(49):1921–1925. PMID: 13147488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polat M, Kahramanoglu I, Senol T, Senturk B, Ozkaya E, Karateke A. Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy on lower urinary tract function, vaginal length, and dyspareunia: a randomized clinical trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2016;26(2):116–121. PMID: 26671303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CR, Giles D. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43(3):463–478. PMID: 27521879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misirlioglu S, Boza A, Urman B, Taskiran C. Clermont-ferrand versus vectec uterine manipulator for total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;28(1):51–56. PMID: 29764264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160. PMID: 19897823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Linde RW. Hysterectomy. Am J Nurs. 1950;50(5):293–295. PMID: 15410798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassallo BJ, Culpepper C, Segal JL, Moen MD, Noone MB. A randomized trial comparing methods of vaginal cuff closure at vaginal hysterectomy and the effect on vaginal length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1805–1808. PMID: 17132483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee HK, Jalaludeen A, Bansal V, et al. Impact of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(3):1287–1295. PMID: 27444831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal P, Bindal N, Yadav R. Risks and Benefits of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and the Effect of Learning Curve on Them. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(5):379–384. PMID: 27486285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):2996–2999. PMID: 10601085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassif J, Wattiez A. Clermont Ferrand uterine manipulator. Surg Technol Int. 2010;20:225–231. PMID: 21082571.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6):1717–1724. PMID: 1615980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katon JG, Gray K, Callegari L, et al. Trends in hysterectomy rates among women veterans in the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):428.e1–428.e11. PMID: 28578175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Haak L, Alleblas C, Nieboer TE, Rhemrev JP, Jansen FW. Efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic surgery: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1003–1011. PMID: 25967852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde CV. Mangeshikar Uterine Manipulator. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(2):134–136. PMID: 27046971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelmonem AM. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):190–192. PMID: 20427116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan Ö, Özer A, Köstü B, Bakacak M, Kıran G, Avcı F. Comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function after abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(1):39–41. PMID: 26475076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiber LD, Dassel M, Pasic R, Ginn D, Jeremy G, Biscette S. Vaginal Length and Sexual Function Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:106–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.287.PMID: 27678576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsson JI, Cohen SL, Gobern JM, et al. Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(4):492–498. PMID: 23680517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill AM, Davis KM, Clark-Donat L, Hammons LM, Azodi M, Silasi DA. The effect of vertical versus horizontal vaginal cuff closure on vaginal length after laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):108–113. PMID: 27702701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tower AM, Clark Donat L, Azodi M, Silasi DA. The effect of vertical versus horizontal vaginal cuff closure on vaginal length after laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.205.PMID: 27679335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi R, Wei W, Jiang P. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma: emphasis on nerve content in removed cardinal ligaments. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(1):192–198. PMID: 26569055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar