References
- Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):548–558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3769.
- Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Bardsley TR, Greene T, Varner MW, Silver RM. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort. Am J Perinatol. 2013;31(09):799–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1361833.
- Diaz SD, Jones JE, Seryakov M, Mann WJ. Uterine rupture and dehiscence: ten-year review and case-control study. South Med J. 2002;95(4):431–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-200295040-00012.
- Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(5):562–572. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008.
- Saravelos SH, Jayaprakasan K, Ojha K, Li TC. Assessment of the uterus with three-dimensional ultrasound in women undergoing ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):188–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw040.
- Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging manifestations of cesarean scar defect in reproductive-aged women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):893–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020.
- Erickson SS, Van Voorhis BJ. Intermenstrual bleeding secondary to cesarean scar diverticuli: report of three cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 2):802–805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00314-7.
- Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, et al. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(7):695–700. quiz 701-692. doi:https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.695.
- Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18(1):13–16. quiz 17–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13.
- Van Horenbeeck A, Temmerman M, Dhont M. Cesarean scar dehiscence and irregular uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 2):1137–1139.
- Bij de Vaate AJM, Brölmann HAM, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JAF. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(1):93–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8864.
- van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(2):236–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12542.
- Bij de Vaate AJM, van der Voet LF, Naji O, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(4):372–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13199.
- Baranov A, Gunnarsson G, Salvesen KA, Isberg PE, Vikhareva O. Assessment of cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(4):499–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14833.
- Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):974–980. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.024.
- van der Voet LF, Vervoort AJ, Veersema S, BijdeVaate AJ, Brölmann HAM, Huirne JAF. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(2):145–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12537.
- Matteson KA, Raker CA, Clark MA, Frick KD. Abnormal uterine bleeding, health status, and usual source of medical care: analyses using the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. J Women’s Health (2002). 2013;22(11):959–965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2013.4288.
- Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, Lin YP, Pan YJ, Horng SG. Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):218–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.10.016.
- Gubbini G, Centini G, Nascetti D, et al. Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(2):234–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.011.
- Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C, et al. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(3):289–292.
- Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brolmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Why do niches develop in caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Human Reprod (Oxford, England). 2015;30(12):2695–2702.
- Florio P, Gubbini G, Marra E, et al. A retrospective case-control study comparing hysteroscopic resection versus hormonal modulation in treating menstrual disorders due to isthmocele. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(6):434–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2010.495431.
- Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Lee CL, Kay N. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):370.e1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.038.
- Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernández C, Mackenna A, Zegers F, Fernández E. Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(1):25–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.023.
- Vervoort AJMW, Van der Voet LF, Witmer M, et al. The HysNiche trial: hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0260-8.
- Chen Y, Chang Y, Yao S. Transvaginal management of cesarean scar section diverticulum: a novel surgical treatment. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:1395–1399. doi:https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890642.
- Feng Y-L, Li M-X, Liang X-Q, Li X-M. Hysteroscopic treatment of postcesarean scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(4):498–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.010.
- Nirgianakis K, Oehler R, Mueller M. The Rendez-vous technique for treatment of caesarean scar defects: a novel combined endoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):770–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4226-6.
- Urman B, Arslan T, Aksu S, Taskiran C. Laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect “isthmocele”. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):857–858. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.012.
- Vervoort A, van der Voet LF, Hehenkamp W, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in women with postmenstrual spotting: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(3):326–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14733.
- Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Zimmer M. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3.
- Laganà AS, Pacheco LA, Tinelli A, Haimovich S, Carugno J, Ghezzi F. Optimal timing and recommended route of delivery after hysteroscopic management of isthmocele? A consensus statement from the global congress on hysteroscopy scientific committee. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(4):558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.018.
- Schepker N, Garcia-Rocha GJ, von Versen-Hoynck F, Hillemanns P, Schippert C. Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(6):1417–1423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3582-0.
- Donnez O, Donnez J, Orellana R, Dolmans M-M. Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):289–296.e2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.033.