Evaluation of the Hemostatic Efficacy of Two Powdered Topical Absorbable Hemostats Using a Porcine Liver Abrasion Model of Mild to Moderate Bleeding

References

• Lewis KM, Spazierer D, Urban MD, Lin L, Redl H, Goppelt A. Comparison of regenerated and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose hemostatic agents. Eur Surg. 2013;45:213–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-013-0222-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson RW, George K, Johns D, Craven L, Zhang G, Shnoda P. Hemostatic efficacy and tissue reaction of oxidized regenerated cellulose hemostats. Cellulose. 2013;20(1):537–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9828-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangler D, Rothenburger S, Nguyen K, Jampani H, Weiss S, Bhende S. In vitro antimicrobial activity of oxidized regenerated cellulose against antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Surg Infect (Larchmt)). 2003;4(3):255–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/109629603322419599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang AY, Rafalko J, MacDonald M, Ming X, Kocharian R. Absorbable hemostatic aggregates. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(12):3675–3686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Elela A, Morsy A, Badawy H, Fathy M. Use of oxidized cellulose hemostats (Surgicel) to support parenchymal closure and achieve hemostasis following partial nephrectomy. Surg Technol Int. 2009;18:75–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aykan S, Temiz MZ, Ulus I, et al. The use of three different hemostatic agents during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A comparison of surgical and early renal functional outcomes. Eurasian J Med. 2019;51(2):160–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda A, Stepanian SV, Lam JS, et al. Use of haemostatic agents and glues during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe of 1347 cases. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):798–803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley DS, Lee DI, Eichel L, Uribe CA, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Fibrin glue-oxidized cellulose sandwich for laparoscopic wedge resection of small renal lesions. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1477–1481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154165.12738.7f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister M, Ah-See K. Safety of the haemostatic agent Surgiflo® in excisions of the submandibular gland: our experience in 17 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52(9):e134–135–e135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang JJ, Hong SJ, Han JP, Ko BM, Lee TH, Lee JS. Efficacy of Surgicel® (Fibrillar) for preventing bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial tumors. J Dig Dis. 2018;19(11):657–663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung YS, Ko BM, Han JP, et al. Effectiveness of Surgicel(R) (Fibrillar) in patients with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1534–1541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4369-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germanos S, Bolanis I, Saedon M, Baratsis S. Control of presacral venous bleeding during rectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2010;200(2):e33–35–e35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC, Machado MC. Laparoscopic resection of uncinate process of the pancreas. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1391–1392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0390-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl RJ, Hochman DJ, Sample C. Laparoscopic management of splenic cysts: marsupialization, cavity lining with surgicel and omentopexy to prevent recurrence. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(5):455–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31811ea2d2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi V, Dy V. Control of port-site bleeding from smaller incisions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery: a new, innovative, and easier technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12(4):224–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200208000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awonuga AO, Merhi ZO, Khulpateea N. Abdominal packing for intractable obstetrical and gynecologic hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;93(2):160–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.12.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güney G, Kaya C, Oto G, Yıldırım S, Özdemir H, Tokmak A. Effects of quercetin and surgicel for preventing adhesions after gynecological surgery: A rat uterine horn model. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(1):179–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma JB, Malhotra M. Successful management of uterine incision hemorrhage in caesarean section with topical oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel Nu Knit): a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274(2):115–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0074-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma JB, Malhotra M, Pundir P. Laparoscopic oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) application for small uterine perforations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(3):271–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00155-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YH, Yang KC, Liu WC, Kao CC, Chen LW, Lin CT. The safety and benefit of using oxidized regenerated cellulose to position free flap pedicle in head and neck reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2019;39(6):521–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshman S, Aqua K, Stefanovic A. A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Fibrin Sealant Grifols as an Adjunct to Hemostasis During Soft Tissue Open Surgery. J Invest Surg. 2018;33(3):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ereth MH, Schaff M, Ericson EF, Wetjen NM, Nuttall GA, Oliver WC Jr. Comparative safety and efficacy of topical hemostatic agents in a rat neurosurgical model. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4 Suppl 2):369–372. discussion 372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel M, Stummer W. The use of local agents: Surgicel and Surgifoam. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S97–S101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0735-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarzi S, MacDougall M, Lulic D, Kasasbeh A, Levy M. Clinical experience with the surgicel family of absorbable hemostats (oxidized regenerated cellulose) in neurosurgical applications: a review. Wounds. 2013;25(6):160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabay M, Boucher BA. An essential primer for understanding the role of topical hemostats, surgical sealants, and adhesives for maintaining hemostasis. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33(9):935–955. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald MH, Wang AY, Clymer JW, Hutchinson RW, Kocharian R. An in vivo comparison of the efficacy of hemostatic powders, using two porcine bleeding models. MDER. 2017;10:273–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S140663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shaikh S, Muddaiah A, Lee RJ, Bhutta MF. Oxidised cellulose powder for haemostasis following sinus surgery: a pilot randomised trial. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128(8):709–713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215114001303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efeoğlu C, Sipahi Çalış A, Karasu Z, Koca H, Boyacıoğlu H. Prospective randomized single-blind study of post-operative bleeding after minor oral surgery in patients with cirrhosis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019;30(2):171–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2018.18078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer CP, Bochicchio G, Shen J, Patel B, Batiller J, Hart JC. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of fibrin pad as an adjunct to control soft tissue bleeding during abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3):385–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, et al. Comparison of two different types of oxidized regenerated cellulose for partial breast defects. J Surg Res. 2017;214:221–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu N, Tanaka Y, Kuroda S, et al. Oxidized regenerated cellulose for a clear thoracoscopic view: a single-centre randomized trial. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;30(3):346–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetiner H, Cavusoglu I, Duzer S, Sakallioglu O, Susaman N, Yildirim Y. Effect of suturation plus surgicel application on post-tonsillectomy bleeding and pain. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(7):e672–e675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genyk Y, Kato T, Pomposelli JJ, et al. Fibrin Sealant Patch (TachoSil) vs Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Patch (Surgicel Original) for the secondary treatment of local bleeding in patients undergoing hepatic resection: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(3):261–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethicon I. SURGICEL Powder - Absorbable hemostatic powder (oxidized regenerated cellulose)/package insert/instructions for use. Puerto Rico: Ethicon, Inc; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Biom'up. HEMOBLAST bellows/package insert/IFU USA. Lyon, France: Biom'up; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Biom'up. HEMOBLAST Bellows/Package Insert/IFU European Economic Area; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Biom'up. HEMOBLAST™ Bellows/Premarket Approval (PMA); 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P170012.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Overview P. SURGICEL® Powder Absorbable Hemostat, Product Specifications; 2019. https://www.ethicon.com/na/epc/code/3013sp?lang=en-default. Accessed January 2, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets R, Gerhards F, Stein JM, et al. A novel hemostatic delivery device for thrombin: biodegradable poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) 50:50 microspheres. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;96(1):177–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla A, Fang JC, Puranam S, Jensen FR, Hammond PT. Hemostatic multilayer coatings. Adv Mater Weinheim. 2012;24(4):492–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang NC, Ardehali A, Bruckner BA, et al. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the performance of a novel combination powder vs hemostatic matrix in cardiothoracic operations. J Card Surg. 2020;35(2):313–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas KS, Saha SP. Comparison of hemostatic agents used in vascular surgery. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(12):1663–1672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2013.848193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burks S, Spotnitz W. Safety and usability of hemostats, sealants, and adhesives. AORN J. 2014;100(2):160–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardehali A, Spotnitz WD, Hoffman RW, the Advanced Powder Investigators Group (APIG), et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a new hemostatic powder using a quantitative surface bleeding severity scale. J Card Surg. 2019;34(1):50–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.13982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slezak P, Keibl C, Redl H, Labahn D, Gulle H. An efficacy comparison of two hemostatic agents in a porcine liver bleeding model: Gelatin/Thrombin flowable matrix versus collagen/thrombin powder. J Invest Surg. 2019:1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1571130.
   Google Scholar
• Bruckner BA, Ngo U, Ramchandani M, Suarez E, Awad S, Reardon M. Application techniques of a novel hemostat in cardiac operations: HEMOBLAST. J Card Surg. 2019;34(9):849–853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfors B, Watson BM, McAndrew T, et al. Mortality, length of stay, and cost implications of procedural bleeding after percutaneous interventions using large-bore catheters. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(7):798–802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin AN, Robinson SB, Bowdy BD, Jing Y, Johnson BH, Wiederkehr DP. Relationship of hospital-associated bleeding with length of stay and total hospitalization costs in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation. J Med Econ. 2016;19(5):490–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2015.1134545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SV, O'Grady K, Pieper KS, et al. A comparison of the clinical impact of bleeding measured by two different classifications among patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(4):809–816. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyke C, Aronson S, Dietrich W, et al. Universal definition of perioperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(5):1458–1463.e1451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams GL, Manson RJ, Turner I, Sindram D, Lawson JH. The balance of thrombosis and hemorrhage in surgery. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2007;21(1):13–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2006.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorn MN. Measurement of blood loss: review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;55(1):20–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spotnitz WD, Zielske D, Centis V, et al. The SPOT GRADE: A New method for reproducibly quantifying surgical wound bleeding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(11):E664–E671. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slezak P. Reply to Del Gaizo et al.'s "The SPOT GRADE: A Clinically validated, quantitative bleeding severity scale. J Invest Surg. 2019:1–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1651431.
   Google Scholar