References
- Lees BF, Erickson BK, Huh WK. Cervical cancer screening: evidence behind the guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):438–443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.147.
- Karimi Zarchi M, Binesh F, Kazemi Z, Teimoori S, Soltani HR, Chiti Z. Value of colposcopy in the early diagnosis of cervical cancer in patients with abnormal pap smears at Shahid Sadoughi hospital, Yazd. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(12):3439–3441.
- Wentzensen N, Massad LS, Mayeaux EJ, Jr., et al. Evidence-based consensus recommendations for colposcopy practice for cervical cancer prevention in the United States. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017;21(4):216–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0000000000000322.
- Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Thara S, et al. Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India. Int J Cancer. 2003;106(3):404–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11245.
- Louwers J, Zaal A, Kocken M, et al. Dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy: higher sensitivity for detection of premalignant cervical lesions. BJOG. 2011;118(3):309–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02806.x.
- Tuesley KM, Jordan SJ, Siskind DJ, Kendall BJ, Kisely S. Colorectal, cervical and prostate cancer screening in Australians with severe mental illness: retrospective nation-wide cohort study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019;53(6):550–558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867418814945.
- Schneider V. Criticism of the pap smear as a diagnostic tool in cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(4–5):338–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000477653.
- Huy NVQ, Tam LM, Tram NVQ, et al. The value of visual inspection with acetic acid and Pap smear in cervical cancer screening program in low resource settings – a population-based study. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018;24:18–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2018.02.004.
- Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, Members of LAST Project Work Groups, et al. The lower anogenital squamous terminology standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American pathologists and the American Society for colposcopy and cervical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136(10):1266–1297. doi:https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.LGT200570.
- Fan A, Zhang L, Wang C, Wang Y, Han C, Xue F. Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(5):965–972. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4500-z.
- Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K, et al. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):264–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000220505.18525.85.
- Siegler E, Bornstein J, Israeli Colposcopy Network. Loop electrosurgical excision procedures in Israel. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72(2):85–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000329324.
- Kabaca C, Koleli I, Sariibrahim B, et al. Is cervical punch biopsy enough for the management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014;18(3):240–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182aa08f6.
- Godfrey MAL, Nikolopoulos M, Garner JE, et al. Conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) in women under 30 years of age: A cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:267–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.018.
- Lee MH, Finlayson SJ, Gukova K, Hanley G, Miller D, Sadownik LA. Outcomes of conservative management of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in young women. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2018;22(3):212–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0000000000000399.
- Loopik DL, Doucette S, Bekkers RL, Bentley JR. Regression and progression predictors of CIN2 in women younger than 25 years. J Lower Genit Tract Dis. 2016;20(3):213–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0000000000000215.
- Munro A, Powell RG, P AC, et al. Spontaneous regression of CIN2 in women aged 18-24 years: a retrospective study of a state-wide population in Western Australia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(3):291–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12835.
- Tainio K, Athanasiou A, Tikkinen KAO, et al. Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2018;360:k499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k499.
- Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):321.e321–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.033.
- Najib FS, Hashemi M, Shiravani Z, Poordast T, Sharifi S, Askary E. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical pap smear and colposcopy in detecting premalignant and malignant lesions of cervix. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020;11(3):453–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01118-2.
- Baum ME, Rader JS, Gibb RK, et al. Colposcopic accuracy of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(3):966–970. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.002.
- Ferris DG, Litaker M, ALTS Group. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9(1):29–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00128360-200501000-00007.
- Ferris DG, Litaker MS. Cervical biopsy sampling variability in ALTS. J Lower Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15(2):163–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f2ddf3.
- Müller K, Soergel P, Hillemanns P, Jentschke M. Accuracy of colposcopically guided diagnostic methods for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76(02):182–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-111504.
- Nakamura Y, Matsumoto K, Satoh T, et al. Optimizing biopsy procedures during colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20(3):579–585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0739-6.
- Solomon D, Stoler M, Jeronimo J, Khan M, Castle P, Schiffman M. Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):288–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000270154.69879.09.
- Jung Y, Lee AR, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Park DC, Park EK. Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(4):477–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.477.
- Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.
- Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002.
- Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Philippe E. An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(5):468–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349709047830.
- Cheng X, Feng Y, Wang X, Wan X, Xie X, Lu W. The effectiveness of conization treatment for post-menopausal women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5(1):185–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2012.748.
- Stuebs FA, Schulmeyer CE, Mehlhorn G, et al. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(2):525–532. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4953-8.
- Bonardi R, Cecchini S, Grazzini G, Ciatto S. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the transformation zone and colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(6):1020–1022.
- Chia KV, Fayle RJ, Sobowale OA. Efficacy of large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;33(3):287–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1993.tb02089.x.
- Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M, et al. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(6):1549–1554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2493-1.
- Ghosh I, Mittal S, Banerjee D, et al. Study of accuracy of colposcopy in VIA and HPV detection-based cervical cancer screening program. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(6):570–575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12282.
- Rema PN, Mathew A, Thomas S. Performance of colposcopic scoring by modified International Federation of cervical pathology and colposcopy terminology for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a low-resource setting. South Asian J Cancer. 2019;8(4):218–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_302_18.
- Fan A, Wang C, Zhang L, Yan Y, Han C, Xue F. Diagnostic value of the 2011 International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Terminology in predicting cervical lesions. Oncotarget. 2018;9(10):9166–9176. doi:https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24074.
- Hong DG, Seong WJ, Kim SY, Lee YS, Cho YL. Prediction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions using the modified Reid index. Int J Clin Oncol. 2010;15(1):65–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-009-0012-6.
- Petousis S, Christidis P, Margioula-Siarkou C, Sparangis N, Athanasiadis A, Kalogiannidis I. Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(5):1271–1275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4714-8.
- Wentzensen N, Zuna RE, Sherman ME, et al. Accuracy of cervical specimens obtained for biomarker studies in women with CIN3. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115(3):493–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.001.
- Stoler MH, Vichnin MD, Ferenczy A, FUTURE I, II and III Investigators, et al. The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy: analyses from the placebo arm of the Gardasil clinical trials. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(6):1354–1362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25470.
- Options for managing low grade cervical abnormalities detected at screening: cost effectiveness study. BMJ. 2009;339:b2549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2549.
- Budithi S, Peevor R, Pugh D, et al. Evaluating Colposcopy with Dynamic Spectral Imaging During Routine Practice at Five Colposcopy Clinics in Wales: Clinical Performance. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(3):234–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000487319.
- Coronado PJ, Fasero M. Colposcopy combined with dynamic spectral imaging. A prospective clinical study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;196:11–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.007.
- Founta C, Papagiannakis E, Ratnavelu N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy with dynamic spectral imaging for cytology-negative/high-risk HPV positive (failed test of cure) after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) of the cervix: results of the DySIS colposcopy 1 study. Medicine (Baltimore)). 2018;97(1):e9560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000009560.
- Soutter WP, Diakomanolis E, Lyons D, et al. Dynamic spectral imaging: improving colposcopy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(5):1814–1820. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-1636.
- Tidy JA, Brown BH, Healey TJ, et al. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy. BJOG. 2013;120(4):400–410. discussion 410-401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12096.
- Roensbo MT, Hammer A, Blaakaer J. Can dynamic spectral imaging system colposcopy replace conventional colposcopy in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(7):781–785. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12646.
- Underwood M, Arbyn M, Parry-Smith W, et al. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2012;119(11):1293–1301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03444.x.
- Kim SI, Kim SJ, Suh DH, Kim K, No JH, Kim YB. Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;31(2):e13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e13.
- Tverelv LR, Sørbye SW, Skjeldestad FE. Risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher in follow-up of women with a negative cervical biopsy. J Lower Genit. Tract Dis. 2018;22(3):201–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0000000000000394.
- Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(2):430–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.065.
- Kierkegaard O, Byrjalsen C, Hansen KC, Frandsen KH, Frydenberg M. Association between colposcopic findings and histology in cervical lesions: the significance of the size of the lesion. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;57(1):66–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.1100.
- Nam K, Chung S, Kwak J. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. J Lower Genit Tract Dis. 2010;14(4):346–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181e9635b.
- Giannella L. The clinical problem of colposcopy is represented by false-negatives. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(4):711–712. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3619-z.
- Mayor S. Multiple biopsies improve cervical cancer detection in colposcopy. BMJ. 2015;350:h55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h55.
- Massad LS, Collins YC. Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89(3):424–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00082-9.