Comparison of Intraoperative Endplate Injury between Mini-Open Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Analysis of Risk Factors: A Retrospective Study

References

• Burgstaller JM, Steurer J, Gravestock I, et al. Long-term results after surgical or nonsurgical treatment in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(15):1–8. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleege C, Rickert M, Rauschmann M. [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages]. Orthopade. 2015;44(2):114–123. doi:10.1007/s00132-014-3065-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uysal M, Ozalay M, Derincek A, Kochai A, Turker M. Effect of plif and tlif on sagittal spinopelvic balance of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018;52(4):272–276. doi:10.1016/j.aott.2018.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asil K, Yaldiz C. Retrospective comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of plif and tlif techniques in patients who underwent lumbar spinal posterior stabilization. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(17):e3235. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000003235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limthongkul W, Tanasansomboon T, Yingsakmongkol W, Tanaviriyachai T, Radcliff K, Singhatanadgige W. Indirect decompression effect to central canal and ligamentum flavum after extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(17):E1077–E1084. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: Techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including plif, tlif, mi-tlif, olif/atp, llif and alif. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2–18. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (xlif): A novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6(4):435–443. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods KR, Billys JB, Hynes RA. Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at l1-l5 (olif25) and at l5-s1 (olif51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J. 2017;17(4):545–553. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Huang RC, Sama AA. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: A preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24(4):242–250. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181ecf995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tohmeh AG, Khorsand D, Watson B, Zielinski X. Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: Effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(26):E1582–1591. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WJ, Lee JW, Kim SM, et al. Precautions for combined anterior and posterior long-level fusion for adult spinal deformity: Perioperative surgical complications related to the anterior procedure (oblique lumbar interbody fusion). Asian Spine J. 2019;13(5):823–831. doi:10.31616/asj.2018.0304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satake K, Kanemura T, Yamaguchi H, Segi N, Ouchida J. Predisposing factors for intraoperative endplate injury of extreme lateral interbody fusion. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(5):907–914. doi:10.4184/asj.2016.10.5.907.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atarod M. An evaluation of occupant dynamics during moderate-to-high speed side impacts. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021;235(5):546–565. doi:10.1177/0954411921994937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Ha KY, Kim KT, et al. Risk factors for intraoperative endplate injury during minimally-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20149. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99751-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(17):1873–1878. doi:10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel BC, Hoshide R, Taylor W. An algorithm to predict success of indirect decompression using the extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure. Cureus. 2015;7(9):e317. doi:10.7759/cureus.317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gum JL, Reddy D, Glassman S. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif). JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2016;6(2):e22. doi:10.2106/JBJS.ST.15.00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch RF, Luna IY, Brooks DM, Joshua G, O’Brien JR. Clinical and radiographic analysis of expandable versus static lateral lumbar interbody fusion devices with two-year follow-up. J Spine Surg. 2018;4(1):62–71. doi:10.21037/jss.2018.03.16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li YM, Frisch RF, Huang Z, et al. Comparative effectiveness of expandable versus static interbody spacers via mis llif: A 2-year radiographic and clinical outcomes study. Global Spine J. 2020;10(8):998–1005. doi:10.1177/2192568219886278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano I, Jones C, Salzmann SN, et al. Endplate volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography as a novel predictive measure of severe cage subsidence after standalone lateral lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J. 2020b;29(5):1131–1140. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06348-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Faramand A, Alan N, et al. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: A 10-year experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(5):525–529. doi:10.3171/2018.3.SPINE171147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiyama A, Sakai D, Katoh H, Nomura S, Sato M, Watanabe M. Comparative study of cage subsidence in single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Med. 2022;11(5):1374. doi:10.3390/jcm11051374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi Z, Mummaneni PV, Wang M, et al. The association between lower hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(2):E8. doi:10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C, Okano I, Salzmann SN, et al. Endplate volumetric bone mineral density is a predictor for cage subsidence following lateral lumbar interbody fusion: A risk factor analysis. Spine J. 2021;21(10):1729–1737. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Ding W, Yang D, et al. Modic changes (MCS) associated with endplate sclerosis can prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) stand-alone. World Neurosurg. 2020;138:e160–e168. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano I, Jones C, Rentenberger C, et al. The association between endplate changes and risk for early severe cage subsidence among standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020a;45(23):E1580–E1587. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikeit A, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Orr TE. The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(6):556–561. doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0556-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le TV, Baaj AA, Dakwar E, et al. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(14):1268–1273. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458b2f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Coutinho E, Pimenta L. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(1):110–118. doi:10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malham GM, Parker RM, Blecher CM, Seex KA. Assessment and classification of subsidence after lateral interbody fusion using serial computed tomography. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(5):589–597. doi:10.3171/2015.1.SPINE14566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li ZJ, Wang Y, Xu GJ, Tian P. Is peek cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):379. doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1234-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SJ, Lee CS, Chung SS, Kang SS, Park HJ, Kim SH. The ideal cage position for achieving both indirect neural decompression and segmental angle restoration in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (llif). Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(6):E784–E790. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiyama A, Katoh H, Sakai D, Sato M, Tanaka M, Watanabe M. Cluster analysis to predict factors associated with sufficient indirect decompression immediately after single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;83:112–118. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiga Y, Orita S, Inage K, et al. Evaluation of the location of intervertebral cages during oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery to achieve sagittal correction. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017;1(4):197–202. doi:10.22603/ssrr.1.2017-0001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park D, Mummaneni PV, Mehra R, et al. Predictors of the need for laminectomy after indirect decompression via initial anterior or lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;24:1–7. doi:10.3171/2019.11.SPINE19314.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro-Ramirez R, Lang G, Moriguchi Y, et al. Are locked facets a contraindication for extreme lateral interbody fusion? World Neurosurg. 2017;100:607–618. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie H, Ouyang Z, Zhang H. Radiographic analysis of pedicle screw retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-segment spondylolisthesis in adults: A retrospective study and technical note. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(9):2219–2229. doi:10.1111/os.13441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar